AtContact 1-27 Ex Pa

Ex PARTE PRESENTATION NOTIFICATION LETTER submitted by ATCONTACT COMMUNICATIONS, LLC

Ex Parte Notice - 1-27

2010-01-27

This document pretains to SAT-AMD-20060626-00068 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATAMD2006062600068_797217

Pantelis Michalopoulos                                                            1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
202.429.6494                                                                       Washington, DC 20036-1795
pmichalo@steptoe.com                                                                         Tel 202.429.3000
                                                                                             Fax 202.429.3902
                                                                                                   steptoe.com




January 27, 2010

Via ELECTRONIC FILING

Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554

Re:     Ex Parte Filing – Petition for Reconsideration by AtContact Communications, LLC, of
        International Bureau Order DA 09-1850, Call Signs S2346, S2680, S2681, S2682, and S2683

Dear Ms. Dortch:

        On January 26, 2010, the undersigned counsel for AtContact Communications, LLC
("AtContact") met with Austin Schlick, General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel; Priya Aiyar,
Legal Advisor for Wireline Competition and International Issues, Office of Chairman Julius
Genachowski; Roderick Porter, Deputy Chief, International Bureau; and Fern Jarmulnek, Deputy Chief,
Satellite Division, International Bureau, regarding AtContact’s pending Petition for Reconsideration of
the International Bureau's Order nullifying AtContact's satellite space station licenses.

        AtContact summarized the contents of that petition. In addition, AtContact pointed to three
pertinent factors worth emphasizing in this proceeding. They are: the policy importance of endowing
remote Alaska and other areas with broadband service; the recognition of the hurricane-strength
financial crisis that has thwarted many capital-intensive projects (but not AtContact’s); and the fact that
cancellation of AtContact’s license is not necessary to satisfy the anti-warehousing policies informing
the Commission’s milestone rules, as AtContact stands in nobody’s way. These factors all militate for
resolving uncertain questions in favor of leniency and giving AtContact another chance. AtContact will
soon make a more comprehensive submission elaborating on these questions.

      Pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206(b), this notice is being filed electronically with a copy emailed to
the Commission officials that participated in the meeting.


Marlene H. Dortch
January 27, 2010
Page 2


                        Respectfully submitted,

                               /s/

                        Pantelis Michalopoulos
                        Counsel for AtContact Communications, LLC


cc:   Priya Aiyar
      Fern Jarmulnek
      Roderick Porter
      Austin Schlick



Document Created: 2010-01-27 19:11:37
Document Modified: 2010-01-27 19:11:37

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC