Attachment ex parte

ex parte

Ex PARTE PRESENTATION NOTIFICATION LETTER submitted by EchoStar ; MSV

ex parte

2005-03-25

This document pretains to SAT-AMD-20040928-00192 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATAMD2004092800192_426542

                                   STEPTOE &JOHNSON«w
                                           attorniys at taw                       gy pagTE OR LATE FILED
 Panees Mictalopootos                                                                     110 Comecteut Arerve. NW
 roamen                                                                                    Washingn. DC 200361705
 Piimppnecom                                                                                       Taroama000
                                                                                                        es
                                                                                                     Fac2024203002




                                                    RECEIVED
March 25, 2008                                            wae 3 6 2s                         ORlGlNAL
                                                 setent onmuricatos Coril isien
                                                         aitenotSeaniay
Via HAND DELIVERY                                                                      Received
Marlene H. Dortch                                                                      ApR 0 5 2005
enCommunications Commission
Federal                                                                                 Pocymere
                                                                                             Branch
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554
Re:—    EchoStar Satellite L.L.C.
        SAT—LOA—20030827—00179, SAT—AMD—2002 1 126—00343, Call Sign $2492
        Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC
        SAT—LOA—20001214—00171, SAT—AMD—20040209—00014, Call Sign $2358

Dear Ms. Dortch,
               On March 17, 2005, representatives of EchoStar Satellte L.L.C. (*EchoStar") and
Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC (*MSV") met with Thomas Tyez, Fem Jarmulnek, Robert
Nelson and Cassandra Thomas of the International Bureau, o discuss the above referenced applications.

                 During that meeting, MSV requested thatits amended application to operate mobile
satellite service (°MSS") feeder links using the allotted extended Ku—band frequencies be treated and
granted on two tracks —— first, as a replacement satellite application with respect to the L~ and Ku—band
frequencies on which MSV is already authorized to operate and, second, as a new satelite application
with respect to the additional Ku— frequencies that t requested (subject to bond and milestone
requirements)
                EchoStar re—emphasizes that it takes no position on this "two track" reatment of MSV‘s
application, subject to an important condition that: the grant of MSV‘s request to use the allotted
extended Ku—band frequencies for MSS feeder links and the parallel grant of EchoStar‘s request to use
the same frequencies for Fixed—Satellte Service are possible subject to coordination. Because ofthe
limited use that MSV plans to make ofthis spectrum and the limited number of feeder link stations that
MSV plans to deploy, EchoStar believes that the two proposals can be coordinated. MSV too has
                                                                           No. of         Copioe reoid_Z
                                                                           ust asobe               eh—ms

wasiinoton        +     new vork    +    rhornix      +     tos anories           +.    tonpon       +     srussris


           i                                                                      STEPTOE &JOHNSON«
Marlene H. Dortch
March 24, 2005
Page 2

acknowledged at least the possibility of such coordination. Before the Commission proceeds on the two
tracks requested by MSV, MSV should confirm that this is itsposition, and that, subject to coordination,
it does not object to grant of EchoStar‘s application for thallotted extended Ku—band frequencies at the
101° W.L.orbital location.
                The reason is simple: ifgrant of MSV‘s feeder link proposal were deemed to preclude
other users ofthe allotted extended Ku—band spectrum at 101° W.L., the two tracks requested by MSV
would raise an intolerably high risk that this spectrum will be warchoused. Once MSV‘s request for
additional frequencies is decoupled from itsreplacement satellte application, the business consequences
to MSV of noncompliance with the FCC‘s milestone requirements for thallotted extended Ku—band
frequencies would be significantly lessened. For example, in the event that MSV is unable to obtain
funding for a satellite that utlizes the additional frequencies, it would be able to give up its authorization
for the additional frequencies with litl risk toits existing L~Ku—band MSS operations. Therefore, in
keeping with the Commission‘s spectrum policies, the Bureau should not entertain MSV‘s two track
request unless grant ofits feeder link proposal does not preclude EchoStar‘s proposed use of the allotted
extended Ku—band spectrum at 101° W.L.
                Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions about the above.
                                                        Yours sincerely,
                                                            WW:&W A :
                                                       Pantelis Michalopoutos
                                                       Counselfor EchoStar Satellite LL C.

Copy to:
Thomas Tyez, Intemational Bureau
Fem Jarmulnck, International Bureau
Robert Nelson,Intemational Burcau
Cassandra Thomas, Intemational Bureau

Lon Levin, Vice President, Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC
Bruce Jacobs and David Konzcal, Shaw Pittman LLP



Document Created: 2005-04-05 11:07:45
Document Modified: 2005-04-05 11:07:45

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC