Attachment letter

This document pretains to SAT-AMD-20031118-00332 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATAMD2003111800332_413255

                                                                    Tosocrescmamer           rare


                                                                     OFcom
                                                                     ornce or communicmnons

20 December 2004

Mariene H Dortch                                                     en
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission
445 Twoin Stroet SW                                                  reve. commout
Washington DG 20554                                                  ououe. cenatim
usa
+1 200 19 0107                                                       wevintoimmonn

Re:—   ATG Rulemaking 1B Dockat No 01—188
       Applcations of Moble Satelte Ventures Subsidiny LLC              (Receven & novecred
       File No SAT—MOD—200st116—c0383
       Fie No SAT—AVD—20031110—00802                                        bec 2 0 2004
       Fie No SEs—M00—20031t1s.01870
                                                                         Foo — MAILROOM
Dear Mrs Dortch
I am urting to express Ofcont‘sconcern aboutissues related to tforesaan aperation of
Ancilary Terrastial Component (ATC)in e t—band, which are currenty under conideraton
by the FGC. Ofcom is consemed., frsty that the recent Order and Authorisaton for MV to
deploy ATC in I—band allowrs signticant increases n thlavel of ntorterence that may be
recaived by the Inmarsat system, and secondy about proposals for even more dramatc
eliwations tothe astablished ATC lin MSV‘s pending Pottion for Reconsideration.

Ofeom has been following the ATC procsecings wi greatintrnet,since thay reise many
important and difeut issuss. Ofcom agress with the prinisle of alowing fexbity in e use
of spectrum uhere possile, and also agroes wih the oventding requirement to enaure that
such fexibity daes not disrupt the operation of oter existng and planned services.
With regard to L—band, Ofcom is acutely aware, tvough is operatorInmarsat,that spectrum
for MSS is in shor supply. We tharefare agree wih tFCC‘s promise in the February 2008
ATC Orderthat ATG is a secondary servic that should not mpact on tho availabity of
spectrum for MSS. Unfortinataly his promise has been compromised n the recent MSV
ATG lcence grantby the decisiont alow the MSV ATC system to cause more intelerence
10 Inmarsat services than was foreseon in the 2003 ATG Order.

The ATC Ordar was adaptad aftr at ieast wo yoars of debate and i is clear from the Order
that tFGC spent consideraile effrt in balancing the domands ofthe ATC proponents with
the requirement to protect ho expactations of MSS user and oatL—band. As mantioned
aieady, Ofcom feais that the FCC was successfu in achioving is balance, and we are

                                                                     Tegtone + « ons mt 1o
                                                       l tec         |ficai cummoniions
                                                                     wecdomand

We would be pleased to discuss thase matirs win you in more coran


en—cec— z00e 10041 rvom                                                  To: soaresessonser        mere




      reasonably contant trat i the prescriptions ofthe ATC Order are adhered to,Inmarsats
      satelite systom wil not be unduly affected.
       However, he recent MSV ATC lcence grant upsets this dalcate balance by allwing
       signifeant increases in the amount ofintrference that may be caused to MSS batt in the
       upink and n the dowriink, Even if some aspects of the FCC inteference analysis may be
       conservative, we won‘t know is wih certainty untreal ATC oparatons have staried. We
       also noto hat Inmarsat has pointad out areas where the FCC analysis underostimatos the
       ameunt f Inteference that wil be caused to MSS.
       it would bo a mitake to alow relaxations o the carefly crfted ATC rulos at is time. it wl
       be easierto alow such relations n the futir,i experience shows that this is posslble
       wihout causing harm to nmarsat sarvices, than it would be to scale back ATC oporations
      that are found to cause excessve interference. This approach would also bo more in Inc
      wth the secondary nature of ATC.
      Consequenty, we requestthe CC to reconsider the dacision to alow MBV relaxations of
      the ATC protection limis. We also take this opportunty o express our very sttong concem
      wih the furtor relaxations proposed by MSV in ts Pattio for Reconsideration or the 2008
       ATC Ordar. Thase relaxations go much furher than thase granted in the MSV ATC loanon
       and our contem with trese MSV proposals is amplifed in equal measure.
       We woult be pleased to discus those matters wih you in mare dotal.

       Yours sincoraly




                                                                                             202



Document Created: 2005-01-12 12:18:39
Document Modified: 2005-01-12 12:18:39

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC