Attachment amendment satamd1999

This document pretains to SAT-AMD-19990930-00094 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATAMD1999093000094_1161636

READ INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY APPROVED BY OMB 3060—0589 BEFORE PROCEEDING FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSI Amends SAT—LOA-1QQ7092500123 —— ipibssess 358210 PAGE No. _SE? 191—SAT—P/LA—97 YER . iclly as It appears on your card) (3) TOTAL AMOUNT PAID (dollars and cents) Haig Capital, LLC * 1280 .00 (4) STREET ADDRESS LINE NO. 1 18 Corporate Woods Blvd., 3rd Floor (5) STREET ADDRESS LINE NO. 2 (6) ony ¢) sae (@) 2P coor Albany NY 12211 © DATTME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (10) GOUNTRY GOBE (if not n USA) (518) 462—2632 SECTION B — AFPL|CANT INFORMATION (11) APPLDCANT NAME (if paying by credit card, enter name exacily as it appears on your card) CAI Satellite Communications, Inc. (12) STREET ADDRESS LINE NO 1 c/o Brian Robinson, Arter & Hadden, LLP (13) STREETADDRESS LINE NO.2 ; 1801 K Street, N.W., Suite 400—K (14) CY I (15) STATE (16) ZIP CODE Washington DC 20006 (17) DAYTME TELEPHONE NUMBER (include area code) (18) COUNTRY CODE (if not in U.SA.) (202) 7757126 nfllsEB\ncEmflMOREBOXESIARENEEDED“{U:S.E*C' A : SECTION C — PAYMENT INFORMATION cau. sicwomer in (2010PAYMENT TYPE GoE (PTG) (21A) QUaNTTY @zA) FEE DUE FOR (PTC) N ocK 20A C | W | C ‘ 1| 1,2890.00 (230) Fec cone 1 (24A) Foc cope 2 (198)FCC CALL SIGN/OTHER ID (208) PAYMENT TYPE CODE (PTG) (218) QUANTITY (228) FEE DUE FOR (PTC) IN BLOCK 208 | | | s (228) Foc cooE 1 (248) FCC CODE 2 (190) FCC CALL SIGNIOTHER iD @0C) PA"l‘MEN‘l‘TYFlE CobE (PT|C) (@1C)ovanmty s Z20) ree cone 1 (24G)FoG cobe 2 (19D) FCC CALL SIGN/OTHER D (@200) PA\l‘MENTWPT CODE (PT|C) (@t0)ouanmy (230) Eoc cope 1 PAYER TIN 0|o s 1|3 @nce ToN STaTEMENT M pamime , Certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing and supporting Information are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, infomation and belief, SIGNATURE SECTION F — CREDIT CARD PAYMENT INFORMATION o Ninstercanovis® Account Numeer: mastercaro Morm vear Yea 1 herebyauthories the FCG to charg myVISAcrMASTERCARD AUTHORZED SIGNATURE DAtE for the servca(ssutheczaton(s)heran desceied. p SEE PUBLIC BURDEN ESTIMATE ON REVERSE FCC FORM 159 JULY 1997 (REVISED)

ARTER & HADDENu ATTORNEYS AT LaAW founded 1843 Austin . San Antonio Cleveland San Di Columbus 1801 K Street, N.W., Suite 400K. San Fr:f:isco Dallas Washington, D.C. 20006—1301 — Washington, D.C. Dayton Irvine telephone 202.775.7100 Woodland Hills Affiliated Offices Los Angeles facsimile 202.857.0172 Brussels, Belgium Sacramento Geneva, Switzerland Direct Dial: (202) 775—7960 Internet: jtroup@arterhadden.com brobinso@arterhadden.com September 30, 1999 Ms. Magalie Roman Salas, Secretary Federal Communications Commission International Bureau — Earth Station P.O. Box 358210 Pittsburgh, PA 15251—5210 Re: FCAI Satellite Communications, Inc. Application Amendment (FCC Form 312) File No. 191—SAT—P/LA—97 Dear Ms. Salas: CAI Satellite Communications, Inc. (CAI), by its attorneys, hereby submits an original and nine copies of its FCC Form 312 Application amendment to the referenced V—band system application. Also enclosed is a Fee Remittance Form (FCC Form 159) and a check payable to the Federal Communications Commission in the amount of $1,280 to cover the filing fee. Acknowledgment and date of receipt of this filing is requested. A duplicate copy of this application is provided for this purpose. Should you have questions concerning this matter, please contact Brian Robinson at (202) 775—7126. | Sincerely, Brian D. Robinson enclosure

Approved by OMB FCC 312 3050—0078 Main Form Est. Avg. Burden Hours Per Response: 11 Hes. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION "C APPLICATION FOR SATELLITE SPACE AND EARTH STATION AUTHORIZATIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION 1. Legal Name ofApplicant 2. Voice Telephone Number CAI Satellite Communications, Inc. 518—462—2632 3. Other Name Used for Doing Business (ifany) 4. Fax Telephone Number 518—462—2951 5. Mailing Street Address or P.O. Box — 6. City 18 Corporate Woods Boulevard Albany 7. State / Country (ifnot U.9.A.) 8. Zip Code ATTENTION: NY 12211 9. Name of Contact Representative (Ifother than applicant) 10. Voice Telephone Number Brian D. Robinson 202—775—7126 11. Firm or Company Name 12. Fax Telephone Number Arter & Hadden, LLP 202—857—0172 13. Mailing Street Address or P.O. Box 14. City 1801 K Street, N.W., Suite 400K Washington s s 15. State / Country (ifnot U.S.A.) 16. Zip Code AtTTENTion: Brian D. Robinson fafe ty C 20006—1301 CLASSIFICATION OF FILING 17. Place an "X" in the box next to the classification that applies to this filing for both questions a. and b. Mark only one box for 17a and only one box for 17b. D b1. Application for License ofNew Station D b6. Transfer ofControl of License or Registration J [Z] b2. Application for Registration ofNew [] b7. Notification ofMinor Modification [Z] at. Earth Station Domestic Receive—Only Station 2. [X b3. Amendment to a Pending Application [_] b8. Application for License ofNew Receive—Only Station Using Non—U.S. Licensed Satellite [X a2. Space Station tBaar & fotran & : . faas a [:] b4. Modification of License or Registration D b9. Letter ofIntent to Use Non—U.S. Licensed Satellite to Provide Service in the United States [] b5. Assignment ofLicense or Registration [7] b10. Other (Please Specify): 18. If this filing is in reference to an existing station, enter: 19. Ifthis filing is an amendment to a pending application enter: Call sign ofstation: (a) Date pending application was filed: (b) File number ofpending application: September 25, 1997 191—SAT—P/LA—97— FCC 312, Main Form — Page 1 February, 1998

TYPE OF SERVICE 20. NATURE OF SERVICE: This filing is for an authorization to provide or use the following type(s) ofservice(s): Place an "X"" in the box(es) next to all that apply. [A a. Fixed Satellite [_] c. Radiodetermination Satellite [_] e. Direct to Home Fixed Satellite [Z] b. Mobile Satellite [D] d. Farth Exploration Satellite [_] £Digital Audio Radio Service [_] g. Other (pleasespecify) 21. STATUS: Place an "X"in the box next to the applicable status. Mark only one box. 22. Ifearth station applicant, place an "X" in the box(es) next to all that apply. [_] a. Common Carrier [ b. Non—Common Carrier [_] a. Using U.S. licensed satellites [_] b. Using Non—U.S. licensed satellites 23. Ifapplicant is providing INTERNATIONAL COMMON CARRIER service, see instructions regarding Sec. 214 filings. Mark only one box. Are these facilities: [~] a. Connected to the Public Switched Network [_] b. Not connected to the Public Switched Network 24. FREQUENCY BAND(S): Place an "X"‘ in the box(es) next to all applicable frequency band(s). [_] a. C—Band (4/6 GHz) TYPE OF STATION 25. CLASS OF STATION: Place an "X"" in the box next to the class ofstation that applies. Mark only one box. [Z] a. Fixed Earth Station [_] b. Temporary—Fixed Earth Station [_] c. 12/14 GHz VSAT Network [_] d. Mobile Earth Station e. Space Station [_] £Other Ifspace station applicant, go to Question 27. (Specify) 26. TYPE OF EARTH STATION FACILITY Mark only one box. L___] a. Transmit/Receive D b. Transmit—Only |:| ©. Receive—Only PURPOSE OF MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT 27. The purpose ofthis proposed modification or amendment is to: Place an "X"" in the box(es) next to all that apply. [ a —— authorization to add new emission designator and related service b —— authorization to change emission designator and related service [~—] c —— authorization to increase EIRP and EIRP density d —— authorization to replace antenna e —— authorization to add antenna £—— authorization to relocate fixed station g —— authorization to change assigned frequency(ies) h — authorization to add Points ofCommunication (satellites & countries) 1 —— authorization to change Points ofCommunication (satellites & countries) j —— guthorization for facilities for which environmental assessment and radiation hazard reporting is required [x] k—Othee (PleaseSpeciyUdate ownership information ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY 28. Would a Commission grant ofany proposal in this application or amendment have a significant environmental impact as defined by 47 CFR 1.13077 j YE NO If YES, submit the statement as required by Sections 1.1308 and 1.1311 ofthe Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.1308 and 1.1311, as an exhibit to this application. D S @ FCC 312, Main Form — Page 2 February, 1998

ALIEN OWNERSHIP 29. Is the applicant a foreign government or the representative of any foreign government? [] YEsS [(# No 30. Is the applicant an alien or the representative of an alien? [] yEs [3 No 31. Is the applicant a corporation organized under the laws of any foreign government? [] yEs [3 No 32. Is the applicant a corporation of which more than one—fifth of the capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens or their . [ ¥yEs § No representatives or by a foreign government or representative thereof or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country? . 33. Is the applicant a corporation directly or indirectly controlled by any other corporation of which more than one—fourth of the ) ¥Es [3 No capital stock is owned of record or voted by aliens, their representatives, or by a foreign government or representative thereof or by any corporation organized under the laws of a foreign country? 34. If any answer to questions 29, 30, 31, 32 and/or 33 is Yes, attach as an exhibit, the identification of the aliens or foreign entities, their nationality, their relationship to the applicant, and the percentage of stock they own or vote. BASIC QUALIFICATIONS 35. Does the applicant request any waivers or exemptions from any ofthe Commission‘s Rules? [] ¥Es [3 No IfYes, attach as an exhibit, copies of the requests for waivers or exceptions with supporting documents. 36. Has the applicant or any party to this application had any FCC station authorization or license revoked or had any [ vEs [4 No application for an initial, modification or renewal of FCC station authorization, license, or construction permit denied by the Commission? If Yes, attach as an exhibit, an explanation of the circumstances. 37. Has the applicant, or any party to this application, or any party directly or indirectly controlling the applicant ever been C ¥Es —_ [3 NO convicted of a felony by any state or federal court? If Yes, attach as an exhibit, an explanation of the circumstances. 38. Has any court finally adjudged the applicant, or any person directly or indirectly controlling the applicant, guilty ofunlawfully ) ¥Es [4 No monopolizing or attempting unlawfully to monopolize radio communication, directly or indirectly, through control of manufacture or sale of radio apparatus, exclusive traffic arrangement or any other means or unfair methods of competition? If Yes, attach as an exhibit, an explanation of the circumstances. 39. Is the applicant, or any person directly or indirectly controlling the applicant, currently a party in any pending matter referred ) ¥Es [3 No to in the proceeding two items? If Yes, attach as an exhibit, an explanation of the circumstances. 40. Ifthe applicant is a corporation and is applying for a space station license, attach as an exhibit the names, addresses, and citizenship ofthose stockholders owning of record and/or voting 10 percent or more of the Filer‘s voting stock and the percentages so held. In the case of fiduciary gee Exhibit A. control, indicate the beneficiary (ies) or class of beneficiaries. Also list the names and addresses ofthe officers and directors ofthe Filer. 41. By checking Yes, the undersigned certifies, that neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial [3 vEs [ No ofFederal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti—Drug Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See 47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the meaning of "party to the application" for these purposes. 42a. Does the applicant intend to use a non—U.S. licensed satellite to provide service in the United States? [] YEsSs [3 No If yes, answer 42b and attach an exhibit providing the information specified in 47 C.F.R. § 25.137,as appropriate. Ifno, proceed to question 43. 42b. What administration has licensed or is in the process of licensing the space station? If no license will be issued, what administration has coordinated or is in the process of coordinating the space station? ECC 312, Main Form — Page 3 February, 1998

43. Description. (Summarize the nature of the application and the services to be provided). No Change. Exhibit No. Identify all exhibits that are attached to this can p ormat1ion. CERTIFICATION The Applicant waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or ofthe electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power ofthe United States because of the previous use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests an authorization in accordance with this application. The applicant certifies that grant of this application would not cause the applicant to be in violation ofthe spectrum aggregation limit in 47 CFR Part 20. All statements made in exhibits are a material part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application. The undersigned, individually and for the applicant, hereby certifies that all statements made in this application and in all attached exhibits are true, complete and correct to the best ofhis or her knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. 44. Applicant is a (an): (Place an "X" in the box next to applicable response.) [7] a. Individual [|] b. Unincorporated Association [_] c. Partnership [Z] d. Corporation [_] e. Governmental Entity [_] £. Other (Please specify) 45. Typed Name ofPerson Signing 46. Title ofPerson Signing Jared Abbruzese e 47. Signature 48. Date f 9—28—99 WILLEUL FALSE STATENnyTS MADE ON THIS FORM ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT \(U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001), AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION AUTHORIZATION (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 312(a)(1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 503). FCC 312, Main Form — Page 4 February, 1998

Exhibit A ECc Form 312 September 28, 1999 Page 1 of 6 Appl,ica'vt.i.(‘m,);&me‘ndment CAI Satellifé Commfihications, ‘Inc‘. (CAD) hereby submits this Amendment to its application for authority to constfucf, Iéfin’ch and operate a new V—band éatelli’te system- to update information relating to the ownership of CAI and its parent company CAI Wireless Systems, Inc. (CAI Wireless), following the recent consummation of certain transa;:tions by CAI Wireless. To the extent necessary CAI also requests an exemption ofthe "cut—off" rule pursuant to Section 25.116 of the Commission‘s regulations to permit the continued consideration of CAI‘s application in the current V—band processing round. Ownership Information. At the time CAI filed its initial application, it was a wholly—owned subsidiary of CAI Wireless, a publicly traded entity and one of the nation‘s largest providers of wireless cable television services. Subsequent to the filing of its initial application, CAI ceased to be a wholly— owned subsidiary of CAI Wireless when CAI Wireless filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. 98—17659. The plan of reorganization contemplated, inter alia, that all of the common stock of CAI Wireless issued prior to the filing of the petition for reorganization would be canceled, and new shares Qould be issued to CAI Wireless‘ pre—petition creditors. Merrill Lynch Global Allocation Fund became the single largest shareholder of CAI Wireless, with 41 percent of the issued and outstanding shares of the reorganized CAI Wireless. No other creditor/shareholder

Exhibit A FCC Form 312 september 28, 1999 Page 2 of 6 owned more than 5% of the equity of the reorganized CAI Wireless. In addition, and as part of the reorganization plan, ownership of the Applicant CAI was split in equal parts between CAI Wireless and Haig Capital LLC (Haig). Jared E. Abbruzzese, the then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CAI Wireless, owns 75% of Haig. No other shareholder owns more than 10% of Haig. CAI Wireless sought and received FCC approval for the transfer of control of pre— bankruptcy CAI Wireless, and each of its licensee subsidiaries to the reorganized CAI Wireless. FCC approval wés granted on September 18, 1998, File No. 50605—CM—TC(139)—98. On September 30, 1998, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order approving the plan of reorganization. CAI Wireless consummated the plan on October 14, 1998 and notified the FCC on October 20, 1998. Earlier this year, CAI Wireless also announced that it had executed a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger with MCI WorldCom, Inc. (MCI WorldCom). CAI Wireless filed for and received FCC approval for a transfer of control of the (post—bankruptcy) stock of CAI Wireless to MCI WorldCom to reflect the merger plan. The FCC approved the transfer of | control application on June 28, 1999. See File No. 50293—CM—TC(157)—99. As of July 28, 1999, MCI WorldCom had acquired 62% of the common stock of CAI Wireless and the FCC was so notified. On August 31, 1999, MCI WorldCom acquired the remaining common stock of CAI

Exhibit A FCC Form 312 September 28, 1999 Page 3 of 6 Wireless to complete its merger plan. CAI Wireless is now a wholly—owned subsidiary of MCI WorldCom. The current ownership structure of CAI and CAI Wireless is depicted in Figure 1 below. CA Wireless Systems, Inc. Haig Capital, LLC MCIWorldCom is the parent Jared E. Abbruzzese — 75% and controlling entity No other shareholder owns > 10% 50% 50% CAl Satellite Communications, Inc. (Applicant) Figure 1 The current officers and directors of the Applicant are: James P. Ashman, Director, Executive Vice President & Treasurer Geoffrey Simonds, Director Sabino Rodriguez, III, Secretary Each individual is a citizen of the United State;s. Mr Ashman can be contacted at the CAI corporate address listed on page 1 of the FCC Form 312. Mr. Simonds®‘ address is: Sentech

Exhibit A FCC Form 312 september 28, 1999 Page 4 of 6 Medical Systems, Inc., 5353 North West 35°" Avenue, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309. Mr. Rodriquez‘ address is Day, Berry & Howard, One Canterbury Green, Stamford, CT 06091—2047. II. Request for Exemption of the "Cut—off" Rule. To the extent that the ownership changes described above constitute a "major amendment" pursuant to Section 25.116 of the Commission‘s Rules, CAI respectfully requests an exemption from the "cut—off" rule. Section 25.116(c)(2) provides that a post cut—off major amendment involving ownership changes will not cause the underlying application to be treated as newly filed if, "the amendment reflects only a change in ownership or control found by the Commission to be in the public interest and, for which a requested exemption from a ‘cut—off ‘. date is granted." 47 C.F.R. § 25.116(c)(2). .The Commission has stated that an exemption from the cut—off rule is warranted under the following circurhstances: (1) where the ownership amendment is to accomplish an independent legitimate business purpose and not primarily for acquiring pending applications; and (2) where the change in ownership is in the public interest.‘ The ownership amendment described herein is consistent with the Commission’s policies. Consequently, the exemption of the cut—off rule should be granted. ‘Constellation Communications, Inc., 11 FCC Red 18502, 18514 (1996); STARSYS Global Positioning, Inc., 8 FCC Red 1662, 1662—63 (Dom. Fac. Div. 1993); Hughes Communications, Inc., 59 RR 2d 502 (Com. Car. Bur. 1985); Airsignal International, Inc., 81 FCC 2d 472 (1980).

Exhibit A FCC Form 312 September 28, 1999 Page 5 of 6 First, the reported ownership changes occurred for reasons independent of CAI‘s interest in the V—band. The ownership changes reported herein reflect CAT‘s parent, CAI Wireless‘ efforts to restructure its financial position and further merge with MCI WorldCom. MCI WorldCom‘s merger interests are clearly focused on CAI‘s parent company, CAI Wireless, _ which is one of the nation‘s largest providers of wireless cable television service. MCI WorldCom has paid substantial consideration to obtain the common stock of CAI Wireless to obtain the benefit of CAI Wireless‘ nationwide terrestrial microwave facilities and Commission licenses in the Multipoint Multichannel Distribution Service (MMDS). MCI WorldCom will benefit from CAI Wireless‘ terrestrial microwave facilities to assist MCI WorldCom‘s efforts in providing "the last mile" telecommunications facilities necessary to compete with incumbent local exchange carriers. Consequently, MCI WorldCom‘s merger with CAI Wireless cannot be construed as having the primary ‘purpose of obtaining an interest in CAI‘s V—band application. Second, as indicated herein, the ownership change is in the public interest. Despite the fact that the purpose of the reported ownership change is only incidental to CAI and its application in the V—band, CAI will now have access to greater résources to go forward with its business plan, thereby enhancing CAI‘s prospects for making its V—band system available to the public sooner and introducing another competitor in the satellite services market. Finally, the grant of the requested exemption would not prejudice any party or V—band applicant and will not adversely affect the Commission‘s consideration of V—band applications that have been filed with the Commission.

Exhibit A FCC Form 312 Sseptember 28, 1999 Page 6 of 6 III. Conclusion In sum, CAI respectfully submits that the requested grant of an exemption to the "cut—off" rule is consistent with Commission policy and would serve the public interest. Consequently, the Commission should accept the instant ownership amendment pursuant to Section 25.116(c)(2) and treat this amendment as a minor change.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Brian Robinson, do hereby certify that I have on this 30th day of September, 1999, mailed by first—class United States mail, postage prepaid, copies of the foregoing APPLICATION AMENDMENT to the following: Thomas S. Tycz, Chief * Raymond G. Bender, Jr., Carlos M. Nalda Satellite & Radiocommunications Division Dow Lohnes & Albertson PLLC International Bureau 1200 New Hampshire Avenue, N. W. Federal Communiations Commission Suite 800 445 — 12th Street, S. W. Washington, DC 20036—6802 Washington, DC 20554 (Counselfor Lockheed Martin Corporation) Michael McCain, Esq. * Bruce D. Jacobs, David D. Oxenford * International Bureau Stephen J. Berman, David S. Konczal Federal Communiations Commission Fischer Wayland Cooper 445 — 12th Street, S. W. Leader & Zaragoza L.L.P. Washington, DC 20554 2001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006 Pamela Meredith ((Counselfor Pegasus Development Law Offices of Pamela Meredith Corporation) 1101 30th Street, N.W. Suite 500 Henry Goldberg, Joseph A. Godles Washington, D.C. 20007 Mary A. Dent (Counselfor Spectrum Astro) Goldberg, Godles, Weiner & Wright 1229 Nineteenth Street, N. W. Washington, DC 20036 (Counselfor PanAmSat Corporation) Peter A. Rohrbach, Yaron Dori Karis A. Hastings Hogan & Hartson L.L.P. 555 Thirteenth Street, N. W. Washington, DC 20004—1109 (Counselfor GE American Communications, Inc.) Gary P. Epstein, John P. Janka Arthur S. Landerholm Latham & Watkins 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. Suite 1300 Washington, DC 20004 (Counselfor Hughes Communications, Inc.)

Norman P. Leventhal, Raul R. Rodriguez Phillip L. Malet, Pantelis Michalopoulos * Stephen D. Baruch, David S. Keir Marc A. Paul, James M. Talens Leventhal, Senter & Lerman P.L.L.C. Maury D. Shenks, Michael D. Nilsson 2000 K Street, N. W., Suite 600 Steptoe & Johnson, L.L.P. Washington, DC 20006—1809 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N. W. (Counselfor TRW, Inc.) Washington, DC 20036—1795 (Counselfor Motorola, Inc. Stephen E. Coran, David G. O‘Neil and Echostar DBS Corporation) Mary A. Dent Rini, Coran & Lancellotta, P.C. Richard E. Wiley, Esq. 1350 Connecticut Avenue, N. W., Suite 900 Todd M. Stansbury, Esq. Washington, DC 20036—1701 Wiley Rein & Fielding (Counselfor @Contact, LLC and 1776 K Street, N. W. KaStarcom World Satellite LLC) Washington, DC 20006 (Counselfor DirectCom Networks, Inc.) John C. Quale, Brian D. Weimer Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP Philip L. Verveer, Stephen R. Bell 1440 New York Avenue, N. W. Jennifer D. McCarthy Washington, DC 20005—2111 Willkie Farr & Gallagher (Counselfor Celsat America, Inc.) Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, N. W., Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036—3384 (Counselfor Loral Space & Communications, Ltd., Loral Orion Service, Inc. and Loral Orion Asia Pacific, Inc.) @M)/ZW Brian D. Rol?inson * Hand—delivered


Document Created: 2016-12-15 18:40:47
Document Modified: 2016-12-15 18:40:47
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC