Cypress-Broadvox 10.

SUPPLEMENT submitted by c/o Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

supplemental info on CLEC certs and affiliations

2010-10-29

This document pretains to ITC-T/C-20101015-00413 for Transfer of Control on a International Telecommunications filing.

IBFS_ITCTC2010101500413_848816

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN Lcup A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP WASHINGTON HARBOUR, SUITE 400 NEW YORK, NY F ACSIMILE CHICAGO, IL 3050 KSTREET’ NW (202) 34 2—8 451 stamrorp. cf wWASHINGTON, D.C. 20007—5108 www .kelieydrye.com P A R SIPP ANY, NJ 2 3428 BRUSSELS, BELGIUVM (202) 400 DIRECT LINE: (202) 442—8573 AFFILIATE OFFiCES MUMBAI, [NDTA EMAIL: jgriffin@kelieydrye.com October 29, 2010 VIA ECFS aND IBFS Marlene Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445—12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: Cypress Communications Operating Company, LLC Application for Authority to Transfer Control of Company Holding International and Blanket Domestic Section 214 Authority WC Docket No. 10—216 IB File No. ITC—T/C—20101015—00413 Dear Ms. Dortch: As requested by FCC staff, the Applicants in the proceedings captioned above hereby provide the following additional information to supplement their Applications. Unless otherwise noted, the meaning of each capitalized term is as defined in the Applications. State CLEC certificates held by Cypress. Cypress holds certificates to provide intrastate service granted by public utility commussions in the following states: AL, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC, FL, GA, IL, IN, KY, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, NV, NJ, NY, NC, OK, OR, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, WA, and WL. State CLEC certificates held by Broadvox—CLEC. Broadvox—CLEC holds certificates to provide intrastate service granted by public utility commissions in the following states: AL, CO, CT, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, and WY. DCOL/GRIFJ/431010.1

KELLEY DRYE & WARREN cir Federal Communications Commission October 29, 2010 Page Two In addition, the Applicants supplement their Application by providing information about a current affiliate (as that term is defined in Section 3(1) of the Act) of Broadvox called Infotelecom, LLC ("Infotelecom"). This information was inadvertently omitted from the Applications. Infotelecom is a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly—owned subsidiary of Infotelecom Holdings, LLC ("Infotelecom Holdings"). The membership interests in Infotelecom Holdings are held by Andre Temnorod (50 percent), Eugene Blumin (25 percent), and Alex Bederman (25 percent). As discussed in Sections I.B and IV of the Applications, Mr. Temnorod, Mr. Blumin, and Mr. Bederman each hold more than 10 percent Broadvox and will own more than 10 percent of Cypress post—close. Infotelecom is an information services provider. At present, Infotelecom provides wholesale interconnected VoIP services to other information services providers and IP service providers in CA, TX, IL, MI, OH, IN, NY, NJ, PA, MA, MD, and DC. Infotelecom will soon begin providing wholesale interconnected VoIP services to other information services providers and IP service providers in FL, GA, and NC. Infotelecom does not provide any retail VoIP services. Although Infotelecom does not provide telecommunications services at present, it holds certificates to provide intrastate service granted by public utility commissions in the following states: CA, DC, FL, GA, IL, IN, KS, KY, MD, MA, MI, MN, MO, NV, NC, NJ, NY, OR, OH, PA, TX, and WA. The Applicants reaffirm that the domestic Application is eligible for streamlined processing pursuant to Section 63.02(b)(2) of the Commission‘s Rules because (1) the proposed transaction will result in the Applicants (including their affiliates, as that term is defined in Section 3({1) of the Act) having a market share in the interstate, interexchange market of less than 10 percent; (ii) the Applicants (including their affiliates) will provide competitive telephone exchange services or exchange access services exclusively in geographic areas served by a dominant local exchange carrier that is not a party to the transaction; and (iii) neither the Applicants nor any of their affiliates are regulated as dominant with respect to any service. Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions. Sincerely, DCOL/GRIFJ/431010.1


Document Created: 2019-04-20 05:26:55
Document Modified: 2019-04-20 05:26:55
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC