Attachment Attachment

This document pretains to ITC-T/C-20051219-00532 for Transfer of Control on a International Telecommunications filing.

IBFS_ITCTC2005121900532_518044

CoLge, Rarwip & BRavErRrman, L.LP. ATIORNEYS AT LAW 1919 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 200 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006—3458 Los ANoeues orrice Camecce Frarpier TecepHone (202) 659—9750 2381 Rosscrans Avenue, Suite 110 AptmtEo in DC ano MD Fax (202) 452—00867 EL Seaunpo, Cauronrnia 90245—4200 Tecernone (3i0) sa3—7900 www.CrBLaw.coM Fax i3101 643—70907 Direct Diac 202 828 9822 orkarpiemidcrecaw.com April 19. 2006 VIA COURIER BECGEIVED Ms. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary APR 1 9 2006 Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Cedgral Cammunications Commissio: Washington, DC 20554 Office of Secratary Attn: Renee Crittendon, Acting Division Chief Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau David Krech, Assistant Division Chief Policy Division, International Bureau Re: Removal of Certain Communities from E—Rate Telecommunications Services List, In Re the Joint International and Domestic Application of Cebridge Telecom Limited, LLC et al—WC Docket No. 05—350; IB File No. ITC—T/C 20051219—00532 Dear Secretary Dortch: Cebridge Telecom Limited, LLC, Cebridge Telecom General, LLC (together, "Cebridge" or "Transferees"), and multiple Cox entities (collectively with Cebridge "Applicants") filed the above—captioned joint international and domestic Section 214 application on December 16, 2005 ("Application").‘ In that Application, the parties identified communities in which schools and libraries customers receive telecommunications services and funding for such services fromthe federal Schools and Libraries program ("e—rate") that are to be transferred to Cebridge. See second and third pages of Attachment 3. It has come to the attention of the parties that certain of these communities are no longer Cox customers, or are receiving only Internet access services (not telecommunications services). The affected communities are listed below: Gassville, AR 2. Mountain Home, AR 3. Abilene, TX 4. Bremond, TX 5. Bryan, TX ‘ The specific Cox entities involved are: Cox Communications, Inc.; Cox North Carolina Telcom, L.L.C.; TCA Communications, L.L.C.; Cox Texas Telcom, L.P.; Cox Louisiana Telcom, LL.C.; Cox Missour Teleom, L.L.C.; Cox Oklahoma Telcom, LL.C.; and Cox California Telcom, L.L.C. 0% 200441 _1.D0C wlzls

Core, Raywic & BRavERMAN, L.LP. Seerctary Dortch April 19, 2006 Page 2 6. Calvert, TX 7. College Station, TX 8. Marshall, TX 9.. Quitman, TX 10. Rusk, TX Should the Commission or its staff have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Sincerely, fo s_ cumagl Lflwf‘f&x'\a 0 . c Danielle Frappier %“\J\ Counselfor Cebridge ec: J.G. Harrington, Counsel for Cox Enclosed: Stamp & return copy 200441_1.D0C


Document Created: 2006-04-25 14:24:08
Document Modified: 2006-04-25 14:24:08
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC