Attachment Petition To Deny

Petition To Deny

PETITION TO DENY submitted by Thomas K. Crowe

Petition to Deny dtd 12.3.08

2008-12-03

This document pretains to ITC-214-20081107-00492 for International Global Resale Authority on a International Telecommunications filing.

IBFS_ITC2142008110700492_681218

                         LAW GFFICES OF THOMAS K. CROWE, P.C.
                                    1250 24th STREET, N.W.
                                           SUITE 300
                                   WwASHINGTON, D.C. 20037

                                      TELEPHONE (202) 263—3640
                                         FAX (202) 263—3641
                                      E—MAIL firm@tkerowe.com



                                                   FiLep/actep?tEp *°*°°
BY HAND
                                                       DEC —3 2008
Marlene H. Dortcih, Secretary 8                 Federal Comma;nicafi@m Commisgion
Federal Communications Commission                        imce of the Secratgry
Office of the Secretary
c/o Natek, Inc.
236 Massachusetts Avenue, N.E.
Suite 110
Washington, DC 20002

       Re:     Petition to Deny; File No. ITC—214—2008§1107—00492

Dear Secretary Dortch:

       Enclosed for filing herewith is an original plus four (4) copies of a Petition to Denythe
application in the above referenced proceeding.

         Please acknowledge receipt of this filing by file—stamping and returning the extra copy of
this filing in the envelope provided for this purpose. Please contact the undersigned should you
bave any questions.


                                                                 Respectfully submitted,


                                                         //>/fw\/;7§f’
                                                                 Thomas K. Crowe
                                                                 Cheng—yi Lin,
                                                                 Counsel for Telwise Corporation

Enclosures


co:    David Krech {via email)
       JoAnn Sutton (via email)
       Janeese Parker {via email)
       Raul Magallanes (via ernail)


                                          Before the
                             Federal Communications Commission
                                    Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of                                          }
                                                          )
FILEONEK CORPORATION                                      )
                                                          )
Application for Authority                                 )   File No. ITC—214—20081107—00492
Pursuant to Section 214 of the                            )
Communications Act of 1934, as amended                    )
To Provide Global or Limited                              )
Resale Authority                                          )

                                     PETTTION TO DBENY

       Telwise Corporation ("Telwise"), by its attorneys and pursuant to Section 63.20(d) of the

Federal Communication Commission‘s ("PCC‘s") Rules, 47 CFR. § 63.20(d), respectfully

petitions that the FCC International Bureau ("Bureau") deny FILKONEK CORPORATION‘s

{("FILKONEE‘s" or "Applicant‘s") International Section 214 Application ("Application") which
                                                :H
was acceptedfor filing on November 21, 2008


L.     BACKCGROUND

         elwise is a private carrier that provides wholesale international telecommunications to

other carriers on a contractual basis.   Telwise‘s principal business address is located at 73

Radford Street, Yonkers, NY 10705.       On Qctober 20, 2008 Telwise entered into a Carmier

Services Agreement ("Agreement") to provide wholesale telecommunications to Filkonsk,

Incorporated ("FIL INC"), a foreign telecommunications carrier organized under the laws of the

Philippines with its principal offices located at 18"" Floor Strata 200 Building, Emerald Avenue,

Ortigas Center, Pasig City, Philippines 1600.         The Agreement was executed by Alex Hawak,

President and owner of FIL INC. The Application in question represents that Alex Hawak is the


‘ See File No. ITC—214—20081107—00492; see also Streamlined International Applications
Acceptedfor Filing, Public Notice, Report No. TEL—Q13288 (November 21, 2008).
                                                     4
                                                      1
                                                     L


100% owner of FILEKONEK, and states that its business address is located at 73 Radford Street,

Yonkers, NY 10705. FILKONEK‘s Application also states that the Applicant has no foreign

affiliations or interlocking directorates. The facts and assertions contained herein are supported

by the attached Declaration of an authorized officer of Telwise.


H      THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE DENIED FOR FAMLURE TO DMSCLOSE
       FOREIGN CARRIER AFFILUATIONS AND INTERLOCKING DIRECTORATES

       FILKONEKE‘s      Application     should   be   denied   because     it   contains   apparent

misrepresentations about the Applicant‘s interlocking directorates and foreign carrier affiliations

in violation of Sections 63.18(h) and (i), respectively, of the FCC‘s rules." As described above,

Alex Hawak, the sole owner of FILKONEK, is also the President and owner of FIL INC, a

carrier based in the Philippines. According to the signature line of the Application, Question 18,

Alex Hawak is also an "Officer"? of FILKONEK. Thus, FLEONEE is affiliated with FIL NC

through the common ownership by Alex Hawak, and the two companies also have interlocking

directorates since Hawak also serves as an officer of both.

        ‘ILKONEK clearly misrepresented its foreign affiliations and failed to disclose its

interlocking directorates in the Application.    In the first paragraph of Attachment 1 (labeled

"Cover Letter") to the Application, FILKONEK states that "FILKONEK has no foreign

affiliations."" In Paragraph (i) of Attachment 1 Applicant states that "FILKONEK certifies that

it is not affiliated with any foreign or U.S. facilities—based carrier." Further, in Paragraph (}),

Applicant certifies that it does not seek to provide telecommunications services to any

destination for which an entity that owns more than 25% of FILKONEKalso controls a foreign

carrier in that country, and in Paragraph (p), Applicant requests streamlined processing on the


2 47 CFER. $§ 63.18() & (i).
* See Cover Leiter, Attachment 1 to File No. ITC—214—20081107—00492.

                                                 2


basis that it has no affiliations with foreign cartiers in a destination market in which it seeks

authority to serve.   Finally, Applicant fails to disclose in the Application or Attachment 1 its

interlocking directorates as required by Question 14 and Section 63.18(h) of the FCC‘s rules.

       It would be prima facie inconsistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity

for the Bureau to grant the Application when FILEKEONEK has demonstrated a clear propensity to

make blatant misrepresentations and false certifications to the FCC.


.      THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE DENIED BECAUSE IT UTILIZES TELWISE‘S
       BUSINESS ADDRESS AND CAUSES CONFUSION IN THE MARKETPLACE

       The Application should be denied because FILKONEK‘s use of Telwise‘s business

address has already caused confusion in the marketplace to the detriment of Telwise.       As of

December 2, 2008, Telwiss has directed FILKONEK to immediately cease using               Telwise‘s

business address. FILKEONEK‘s continued use of the address for purposes of the Application

will cause further harm to Telwiss and create further marketplace confusion which will

negatively irapact the public interest, convenience and necessity.

       Telwise initially allowed, through a verbal arrangement, Applicant‘s sole owner, Alex

Hawak, to use Telwise‘s 73 Radford Street business address to receive mail for the purpose of

setting up Hawak‘s U.S. based business, PILKONEK. Alex Hawak, also a citizen and current

resident of the Philippines, indicated that he did not have a current U.S. address to use for

business purposes but would obtain a U.S. address for FILEKONEK in the near future. However,

Telwise did not anticipate that there would be confusion and detriment to the company as a result

of FILKONEEK using the 73 Radford Street address for filing the Application. FILKONEK‘s use

of Telwise‘s address has already created confusion and uncertainty in the marketplace, resulting

in a lawsuit {alleging fraud and misrepresentation} against FILKONEK that also implicates

Telwise as a defendant based upon an inaccurate belief by the plaintiff that the two companies


are affiliated because of the common 73 Radford Street address." This inaccurate association

with FILKONEK has already impeded Telwise‘s ability to conduct business, and has interfered

with Telwise‘s business relationships with its customers.

         Telwise has directed FILKONEK to immediately cease using the address to avoid further

confusion.     Consequently, FILKONEK does not currently have a legitimate business address

listed   in   its Application,   and   continued use of Telwise‘s     address   will   constitute a

misrepresentation to the FCC. Further, should the Application be granted, the continued use of

Telwise‘s address will be an ongoing misrepresentation to the public and inconsistent with the

public interest, convenience and necessity by creating further confusion in the marketplace.


IV.      CONCLUSION

         For the foregoing reasons, Telwise respectfully requests that the Bureau deny the grant of

the Application.

                                                             Respectfully submitted,




                                                        L> //_
                                                             Thomas K. Crowe
                                                             Cheng—yi Liu
                                                             LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS K.
                                                             CROWE, P.C.
                                                             1250 24in Street, N.W.
                                                             Suite 300
                                                             Washington, D.C. 20037
                                                             (202) 263—3640
                                                             firm@tkerowe.com

                                                             COUNSEL FOR TELWISE
                                                             CORPORATION

                                                             December 3, 2008


* See Case Number CGC—08—481422, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco.

                                                 4


      20127      91484813274                         TELWISE                              PAGE   91




                         DECLARATION OF JOSE MALLARI


     Pursuant to 47 CFR. § 1.16, I hereby deciare as follows:




     1 am Vice President of Operations for Telwiss Corporation ("Telwise"), and 1 am

     authorized to make these declarations for Telwise. 1 have personal knowledge of the

     information provided in the declarations below,


     Telwise‘s principal business address is located at 73 Radford Street, Yonkers, NY 10705.
bJ




     On October 20, 2008 Telwiss entered into a Carrier Services Agreemenat ("Agreement")
L2




     to provide wholesale telecommunications to Filkonek, Incorporated ("FIL INC®").


     FIL INC is a foreign based telecommunications carier with its principal business

     address, as stated in the Agreement, of 18"" Floor Strata 200 Building, Emerald Avenue,

     Ortigas Center, Pasig City, Philippines 1600.

     The Agreement was exsouted by Alex Hawak, President of FIL INC.
t




     Alex Hawak is also an owner of FIL INC.


     Alex Hawak is also a citizen of the Philippines, and currently resides thore.


     Telwise miftially allowed, through a verbal arrangement, Alex Hawak to use Telwise‘s

     business address to receive mail for the purpose of setting up Mawak‘s U.S. based

     business, FILKONEEK CORPORATTION ("FILKONEK").


C
C




      >
N
p—s
RJ

          N
          C
          C
              NJ



                    NJ
                    G

                         NJ
                         ~J




                              1O
                              s
                              L.
                              es
                              4s
                              4)
                              —a
                                        C
                                        N
                                                                TELWISE                   PaAGE   —go




                                        Is
          9. As of December 2, 2008, Telwise has directed Alex Hawak and FILKONMEK to

                   immediately cease using Telwise‘s business address.




  I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, under penalty of perjury, the

  foregoing statements are true and corect.


                   Executed on this S        day of Decemiber, 2008




                                                            L. pe Z74C
                                                                Jose Mallari
                                                                Telwise Corporation


                             CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

       I, Conor Hanlon, a legal assistant at the Law Offices of Thomas K. Crowe, P.C.,
do hereby certify that on this 3rd day of December, 2008, a copy of the foregoing Petition
to Deny was served via email upon the following:


David Krech                                       JoAnn Sutton
Policy Division                                   Policy Division
International Bureau                              International Bureau
Federal Communications Commussion                 Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, SW                               445 12th Street, SW
Washington, DC 20554                              Washington, DC 20554
David. Krech@fee.gov                              JoAnn.Sutton@fcee.gov


Janeese Parker                                    Raul Magallanes
Policy Division                                   The Law Office of Raul Magallanes, PLLC
International Bureau                              Counsel for Filkonek Corporation
Federal Communications Commission                 PO Box 1213
445 12th Street, SW                               Houston, TX 77549
Washington, DC 20554                              raul@rmtelecomiaw.com
Janeese.Parker@fec.gov




                                                                    T [       Unz              ~
                                                                                Conor Hanlon



Document Created: 2008-12-03 17:18:38
Document Modified: 2008-12-03 17:18:38

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC