United States Patent: 7667647

[US Patent & Trademark Office, Patent Full Text and Image Database]

( 6 of 13 )

United States Patent	7,667,647
Breen , et al.	February 23, 2010

Extension of aircraft tracking and positive identification from movement areas into non-movement areas

Abstract

At most airports, responsibility of air traffic control starts and stops at the entrance or exit to the runway movement areas, which are taxiways and runways. In the non-movement areas, such as hangers, ramps, and aprons, aircraft movements and separation are no longer the responsibility of air traffic control, but is the responsibility of other parties such as the airport itself, airlines, or other parties. The use of tracking technologies for air traffic control is therefore focused on the movement areas, not the non-movement areas, where there are limitations in aircraft tracking. Furthermore, many of the aircraft transmitting devices are switched off in non-movement areas exacerbating tracking problems in these areas. The present invention includes several methods including broadband multilateration, to extend aircraft tracking from the movement areas into non-movement areas without the need to extend special air traffic control equipment into those areas.

Inventors:	Breen; Thomas J. (Tyngsboro, MA), Smith; Alexander E. (McLean, MA), Rossano; Christopher F. (Chelmsford, MA)
Assignee:	ERA Systems Corporation (Reston, VA)
Appl. No.:	11/545,800
Filed:	October 10, 2006

Related U.S. Patent Documents


Application Number	Filing Date	Patent Number	Issue Date
11492711	Jul., 2006	7429950
11429926	May., 2006	7477193
11343079	Jan., 2006	7375683
11342289	Jan., 2006	7576695
11209030	Aug., 2005	7248219
11257416	Oct., 2005	7495612
11203823	Aug., 2005
11145170	Jun., 2005	7437250
10743042	Dec., 2003	7132982
10638524	Aug., 2003	6806829
09516215	Feb., 2000	6633259
10319725	Dec., 2002	6812890
60123170	Mar., 1999
60440618	Jan., 2003

Current U.S. Class: 342/450 ; 342/456

Current International Class: G01S 3/02 (20060101)

Field of Search: 342/450,453,454,456 701/117,120

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents


1738571	December 1929	Gare
3668403	June 1972	Meilander
3705404	December 1972	Chisholm
3792472	February 1974	Payne et al.
5569322	December 1977	Westerlage et al.
4079414	March 1978	Sullivan
4115771	September 1978	Litchford
4122522	October 1978	Smith
4167006	September 1979	Funatsu et al.
4196474	April 1980	Buchanan et al.
4224669	September 1980	Brame
4229737	October 1980	Heldwein et al.
4293857	October 1981	Baldwin
4315609	February 1982	McLean et al.
4327437	April 1982	Frosch et al.
4359733	November 1982	O'Neill
4454510	June 1984	Crow
4524931	June 1985	Nilsson
4646244	February 1987	Bateman
4688046	August 1987	Schwab
4782450	November 1988	Flax
4811308	March 1989	Michel
4843397	June 1989	Galati et al.
4853700	August 1989	Funatsu et al.
4897661	January 1990	Hiraiwa
4899296	February 1990	Khattak
4910526	March 1990	Donnangelo et al.
4914733	April 1990	Gralnick
4958306	September 1990	Powell et al.
5001490	March 1991	Fichtner
5001650	March 1991	Francis et al.
5017930	May 1991	Stoltz
5025382	June 1991	Artz
5027114	June 1991	Kawashima et al.
5045861	September 1991	Duffett-Smith
5075680	December 1991	Dabbs
5075694	December 1991	Donnangelo et al.
5081457	January 1992	Motisher et al.
5089822	February 1992	Abaunza et al.
5113193	May 1992	Powell et al.
5119102	June 1992	Barnard
5132695	July 1992	Sumas et al.
5138321	August 1992	Hammer
5144315	September 1992	Schwab et al.
5153836	October 1992	Fraughton et al.
5179384	January 1993	De Haan
5191342	March 1993	Alsup et al.
5200902	April 1993	Pilley
5225842	July 1993	Brown et al.
5260702	November 1993	Thompson
5262784	November 1993	Drobnicki et al.
5265023	November 1993	Sokkappa
5268698	December 1993	Smith et al.
5283574	February 1994	Grove
5311194	May 1994	Brown
5317316	May 1994	Sturm et al.
5317317	May 1994	Billaud et al.
5339281	August 1994	Narendra et al.
5341139	August 1994	Billaud et al.
5365516	November 1994	Jandrell
5374932	December 1994	Wyschogrod et al.
5379224	January 1995	Brown et al.
5381140	January 1995	Kuroda et al.
5402116	March 1995	Ashley
5406288	April 1995	Billaud et al.
5424746	June 1995	Schwab et al.
5424748	June 1995	Pourailly et al.
5438337	August 1995	Aguado
5448233	September 1995	Saban et al.
5450329	September 1995	Tanner
5454720	October 1995	FitzGerald et al.
5455586	October 1995	Barbier et al.
5471657	November 1995	Gharpuray
5486829	January 1996	Potier et al.
5493309	February 1996	Bjornholt
5506590	April 1996	Minter
5515286	May 1996	Simon
5528244	June 1996	Schwab
5534871	July 1996	Hidaka et al.
5541608	July 1996	Murphy et al.
5570095	October 1996	Drouilhet, Jr. et al.
5570099	October 1996	DesJardins
5583775	December 1996	Nobe et al.
5590044	December 1996	Buckreub
5596326	January 1997	Fitts
5596332	January 1997	Coles et al.
5608412	March 1997	Welles, II et al.
5614912	March 1997	Mitchell
5617101	April 1997	Maine et al.
5627546	May 1997	Crow
5629691	May 1997	Jain
5635693	June 1997	Benson et al.
5659319	August 1997	Rost et al.
5666110	September 1997	Paterson
5670960	September 1997	Cessat
5670961	September 1997	Tomita et al.
5677841	October 1997	Shiomi et al.
5680140	October 1997	Loomis
5686921	November 1997	Okada et al.
5714948	February 1998	Farmakis et al.
5732384	March 1998	Ellert et al.
5752216	May 1998	Carlson et al.
5757314	May 1998	Aoki
5774829	June 1998	Cisneros et al.
5781150	July 1998	Norris
5784022	July 1998	Kupfer
5793329	August 1998	Nakada et al.
5798712	August 1998	Coquin
5802542	September 1998	Coiera et al.
5825021	October 1998	Uemura
5828333	October 1998	Richardson et al.
5839080	November 1998	Muller
5841391	November 1998	Lucas, Jr. et al.
5841398	November 1998	Brock
5850420	December 1998	Guillard et al.
5867804	February 1999	Pilley et al.
5872526	February 1999	Tognazzini
5884222	March 1999	Denoize et al.
5890068	March 1999	Fattouche et al.
5892462	April 1999	Tran
5913912	June 1999	Nishimura et al.
5920277	July 1999	Foster et al.
5920318	July 1999	Salvatore, Jr. et al.
5923293	July 1999	Smith et al.
5949375	September 1999	Ishiguro et al.
5969674	October 1999	von der Embse et al.
5977905	November 1999	Le Chevalier
5979234	November 1999	Karlsen
5990833	November 1999	Ahlbom et al.
5991687	November 1999	Hale et al.
5995040	November 1999	Issler et al.
5999116	December 1999	Evers
6043777	March 2000	Bergman et al.
6044322	March 2000	Stieler
6049304	April 2000	Rudel et al.
6049754	April 2000	Beaton et al.
6075479	June 2000	Kudoh
6081222	June 2000	Henkel et al.
6081764	June 2000	Varon
6085150	July 2000	Henry et al.
6088634	July 2000	Muller
6092009	July 2000	Glover
6094169	July 2000	Smith et al.
6122570	September 2000	Muller
6127944	October 2000	Daly
6133867	October 2000	Eberwine et al.
6138060	October 2000	Conner
6147748	November 2000	Hughes
6161097	December 2000	Glass et al.
6178363	January 2001	McIntyre et al.
6188937	February 2001	Sherry et al.
6195040	February 2001	Arethens
6195609	February 2001	Pilley
6201499	March 2001	Hawkes et al.
6208284	March 2001	Woodell et al.
6208937	March 2001	Huddle
6211811	April 2001	Evers
6219592	April 2001	Muller et al.
6222480	April 2001	Kuntman et al.
6225942	May 2001	Alon
6230018	May 2001	Watters et al.
6233522	May 2001	Morici
6239739	May 2001	Thomson et al.
6240345	May 2001	Vesel
6246342	June 2001	Vandevoorde et al.
6253147	June 2001	Greenstein
6271768	August 2001	Frazier, Jr. et al.
6275172	August 2001	Curtis et al.
6275767	August 2001	Delseny et al.
6282487	August 2001	Shiomi et al.
6282488	August 2001	Castor et al.
6289280	September 2001	Fernandez-Corbaton
6292721	September 2001	Conner et al.
6311127	October 2001	Stratton et al.
6314361	November 2001	Yu et al.
6314363	November 2001	Pilley et al.
6317663	November 2001	Meunier et al.
6321091	November 2001	Holland
6327471	December 2001	Song
6329947	December 2001	Smith
6337652	January 2002	Shiomi et al.
6338011	January 2002	Furst et al.
6339745	January 2002	Novik
6340935	January 2002	Hall
6340947	January 2002	Chang et al.
6344820	February 2002	Shiomi et al.
6347263	February 2002	Johnson et al.
6348856	February 2002	Jones et al.
6366240	April 2002	Timothy et al.
6377208	April 2002	Chang et al.
6380869	April 2002	Simon et al.
6380870	April 2002	Conner et al.
6384783	May 2002	Smith et al.
6393359	May 2002	Flynn et al.
6396435	May 2002	Fleischhauer et al.
6408233	June 2002	Solomon et al.
6414629	July 2002	Curico
6415219	July 2002	Degodyuk
6420993	July 2002	Varon
6445310	September 2002	Bateman et al.
6445927	September 2002	Kng et al.
6448929	September 2002	Smith et al.
6459411	October 2002	Frazier et al.
6462674	October 2002	Ohmura et al.
6463383	October 2002	Baiada et al.
6469654	October 2002	Winner et al.
6469655	October 2002	Franke et al.
6469664	October 2002	Michaelson et al.
6473027	October 2002	Alon
6473694	October 2002	Akopian et al.
6477449	November 2002	Conner et al.
6492932	December 2002	Jin et al.
6493610	December 2002	Ezaki
6504490	January 2003	Mizushima
6518916	February 2003	Ashihara et al.
6522295	February 2003	Baugh et al.
6531978	March 2003	Tran
6542809	April 2003	Hehls, III
6542810	April 2003	Lai
6545631	April 2003	Hudson et al.
6549829	April 2003	Anderson et al.
6563432	May 2003	Millgard
6567043	May 2003	Smith et al.
6571155	May 2003	Carriker et al.
6584400	June 2003	Beardsworth
6584414	June 2003	Green et al.
6587079	July 2003	Rickard et al.
6606034	August 2003	Muller et al.
6606563	August 2003	Corcoran, III
6615648	September 2003	Ferguson et al.
6617997	September 2003	Ybarra et al.
6618008	September 2003	Scholz
6633259	October 2003	Smith et al.
6657578	December 2003	Stayton
6680687	January 2004	Phelipot
6690295	February 2004	De Boer
6690618	February 2004	Tomasi et al.
6691004	February 2004	Johnson
6707394	March 2004	Ishihara et al.
6710719	March 2004	Jones et al.
6710723	March 2004	Muller
6714782	March 2004	Monot et al.
6721652	April 2004	Sanqunetti
6744396	June 2004	Stone et al.
6750815	June 2004	Michaelson et al.
6751545	June 2004	Walter
6760387	July 2004	Langford et al.
6765533	July 2004	Szajnowski
6789011	September 2004	Baiada et al.
6789016	September 2004	Bayh et al.
6792058	September 2004	Hershey et al.
6798381	September 2004	Benner et al.
6799114	September 2004	Etnyre
6801152	October 2004	Rose
6801155	October 2004	Jahangir et al.
6809679	October 2004	LaFrey et al.
6810329	October 2004	Koga
6812890	November 2004	Smith et al.
6816105	November 2004	Winner et al.
6819282	November 2004	Galati et al.
6823188	November 2004	Stern
6828921	December 2004	Brown et al.
6845362	January 2005	Furuta et al.
6861982	March 2005	Forstrom et al.
6862519	March 2005	Walter
6862541	March 2005	Mizushima
6865484	March 2005	Miyasaka et al.
6873269	March 2005	Tran
6873903	March 2005	Baiada et al.
6876859	April 2005	Anderson et al.
6882930	April 2005	Trayford et al.
6885340	April 2005	Smith et al.
6900760	May 2005	Groves
6912461	June 2005	Poreda
6927701	August 2005	Schmidt et al.
6930638	August 2005	Lloyd et al.
6952631	October 2005	Griffith et al.
6963304	November 2005	Murphy
6967616	November 2005	Etnyre
6977612	December 2005	Bennett
6985103	January 2006	Ridderheim et al.
6985743	January 2006	Bajikar
6992626	January 2006	Smith
7006032	February 2006	King et al.
7012552	March 2006	Baugh et al.
7026987	April 2006	Lokshin et al.
7030780	April 2006	Shiomi et al.
7043355	May 2006	Lai
7050909	May 2006	Nichols et al.
7053792	May 2006	Aoki et al.
7058506	June 2006	Kawase et al.
7062381	June 2006	Rekow et al.
7065443	June 2006	Flynn et al.
7071843	July 2006	Hashida et al.
7071867	July 2006	Wittenberg et al.
7079925	July 2006	Kubota et al.
7095360	August 2006	Kuji et al.
7102570	September 2006	Bar *-On* et al.
7106212	September 2006	Konishi et al.
7109889	September 2006	He
7117089	October 2006	Khatwa et al.
7120537	October 2006	Flynn et al.
7123169	October 2006	Farmer et al.
7123192	October 2006	Smith et al.
7126534	October 2006	Smith et al.
7136059	November 2006	Kraud et al.
7142154	November 2006	Quilter et al.
7148816	December 2006	Carrico
7155240	December 2006	Atkinson et al.
7164986	January 2007	Humphries et al.
7170441	January 2007	Perl et al.
7170820	January 2007	Szajnowski
7187327	March 2007	Coluzzi et al.
7190303	March 2007	Rowlan
7196621	March 2007	Kochis
7206698	April 2007	Conner et al.
7218276	May 2007	Teranishi
7218278	May 2007	Arethens
7221308	May 2007	Burton et al.
7228207	June 2007	Clarke et al.
7233545	June 2007	Harvey, Jr. et al.
7248963	July 2007	Baiada et al.
7250901	July 2007	Stephens
7257469	August 2007	Pemble
7272495	September 2007	Coluzzi et al.
7277052	October 2007	Delaveau et al.
7286624	October 2007	Woo et al.
7307578	December 2007	Blaskovich et al.
7308343	December 2007	Horvath et al.
7321813	January 2008	Meunier
7333052	February 2008	Maskell
7333887	February 2008	Baiada et al.
7352318	April 2008	Osman et al.
7358854	April 2008	Egner et al.
7379165	May 2008	Anderson et al.
7382286	June 2008	Cole et al.
7383104	June 2008	Ishii et al.
7383124	June 2008	Vesel
7385527	June 2008	Clavier et al.
7391359	June 2008	Ootomo et al.
7398157	July 2008	Sigurdsson et al.
7400297	July 2008	Ferreol et al.
7408497	August 2008	Billaud et al.
7408498	August 2008	Kuji et al.
7420501	September 2008	Perl
7430218	September 2008	Lee et al.
7437225	October 2008	Rathinam
7440846	October 2008	Irie et al.
7457690	November 2008	Wilson, Jr.
7460866	December 2008	Salkini et al.
7460871	December 2008	Humphries et al.
7477145	January 2009	Tatton et al.
7479919	January 2009	Poe et al.
7479922	January 2009	Hunt et al.
7479923	January 2009	Carpenter
7479925	January 2009	Schell
7487108	February 2009	Aoki et al.
7501977	March 2009	Ino
7504996	March 2009	Martin
7515715	April 2009	Olive
2001/0014847	August 2001	Keenan
2001/0026240	October 2001	Neher
2002/0009267	January 2002	Shirakawa
2002/0021247	February 2002	Smith et al.
2002/0089433	July 2002	Bateman et al.
2002/0152029	October 2002	Sainthuile et al.
2003/0004641	January 2003	Corwin et al.
2003/0097216	May 2003	Etnyre
2003/0152248	August 2003	Spark et al.
2003/0158799	August 2003	Kakihara et al.
2004/0002886	January 2004	Dickerson et al.
2004/0004554	January 2004	Srinivasan et al.
2004/0039806	February 2004	Miras
2004/0044463	March 2004	Shen-Feng et al.
2004/0086121	May 2004	Viggiano et al.
2004/0094622	May 2004	Vismara
2004/0210371	October 2004	Adachi et al.
2004/0225432	November 2004	Pilley et al.
2004/0266341	December 2004	Teunon
2005/0007272	January 2005	Smith et al.
2005/0021283	January 2005	Brinton et al.
2005/0046569	March 2005	Spriggs et al.
2005/0057395	March 2005	Atkinson
2005/0159170	July 2005	Humphries et al.
2005/0166672	August 2005	Atkinson
2005/0192717	September 2005	Tafs et al.
2005/0228715	October 2005	Hartig et al.
2005/0231422	October 2005	Etnyre
2006/0023655	February 2006	Engel et al.
2006/0044184	March 2006	Kimura
2006/0052933	March 2006	Ota
2006/0119515	June 2006	Smith
2006/0129310	June 2006	Tarrant et al.
2006/0161340	July 2006	Lee
2006/0167598	July 2006	Pennarola
2006/0181447	August 2006	Kuji et al.
2006/0191326	August 2006	Smith et al.
2006/0208924	September 2006	Matalon
2006/0250305	November 2006	Coluzzi et al.
2006/0262014	November 2006	Shemesh et al.
2006/0265664	November 2006	Simons et al.
2006/0276201	December 2006	Dupray
2007/0001903	January 2007	Smith et al.
2007/0040734	February 2007	Evers
2007/0060079	March 2007	Nakagawa et al.
2007/0090295	April 2007	Parkinson et al.
2007/0106436	May 2007	Johansson
2007/0109184	May 2007	Shyr et al.
2007/0159356	July 2007	Borel et al.
2007/0159378	July 2007	Powers et al.
2007/0182589	August 2007	Tran
2007/0213887	September 2007	Woodings
2007/0222665	September 2007	Koeneman
2007/0250259	October 2007	Dare
2007/0252750	November 2007	Jean et al.
2007/0298786	December 2007	Meyers et al.
2008/0027596	January 2008	Conner et al.
2008/0042880	February 2008	Ramaiah et al.
2008/0042902	February 2008	Brandwood et al.
2008/0062011	March 2008	Butler et al.
2008/0063123	March 2008	De Mey et al.
2008/0068250	March 2008	Brandao et al.
2008/0088508	April 2008	Smith
2008/0106438	May 2008	Clark et al.
2008/0106457	May 2008	Bartolini et al.
2008/0109343	May 2008	Robinson et al.
2008/0117106	May 2008	Sarno et al.
2008/0120032	May 2008	Brandao et al.
2008/0129601	June 2008	Thomas
2008/0132270	June 2008	Basir
2008/0137524	June 2008	Anderson et al.
2008/0150784	June 2008	Zhang et al.
2008/0158040	July 2008	Stayton et al.
2008/0158059	July 2008	Bull et al.
2008/0174472	July 2008	Stone et al.
2008/0183344	July 2008	Doyen et al.
2008/0186224	August 2008	Ichiyanagi et al.
2008/0186231	August 2008	Aljadeff et al.
2008/0195309	August 2008	Prinzel, III et al.
2008/0231494	September 2008	Galati
2008/0252528	October 2008	Shen et al.
2008/0266166	October 2008	Schuchman
2008/0272227	November 2008	Sharpe
2008/0275642	November 2008	Clark et al.
2008/0294306	November 2008	Huynh et al.
2008/0297398	December 2008	Kamimura
2009/0005960	January 2009	Roberts et al.
2009/0009357	January 2009	Heen et al.
2009/0012660	January 2009	Roberts et al.
2009/0012661	January 2009	Louis
2009/0015471	January 2009	Shen et al.
2009/0027270	January 2009	Fisher et al.
2009/0051570	February 2009	Clark et al.
2009/0055038	February 2009	Garrec et al.

Foreign Patent Documents


4306660	Aug., 1974	DE
4204164	Aug., 1993	DE
19751092	Jun., 1999	DE
10149006	Apr., 2003	DE
202004007747	Sep., 2004	DE
202006005089	Jun., 2006	DE
102006009121	Aug., 2007	DE
0265902	May., 1988	EP
0466239	Jan., 1992	EP
0514826	Nov., 1992	EP
0550073	Jul., 1993	EP
0574009	Jun., 1994	EP
0613110	Aug., 1994	EP
0613111	Aug., 1994	EP
0614092	Sep., 1994	EP
0629877	Dec., 1994	EP
0355336	Aug., 1995	EP
0670566	Sep., 1995	EP
0682332	Nov., 1995	EP
0505827	Jun., 1996	EP
0385600	Jul., 1996	EP
0732596	Sep., 1996	EP
0487940	Jan., 1997	EP
0774148	May., 1997	EP
0578316	Apr., 1998	EP
0346461	Dec., 1998	EP
0915349	May., 1999	EP
1022580	Feb., 2001	EP
1118871	Jul., 2001	EP
0877997	Dec., 2001	EP
0778470	May., 2002	EP
1202233	May., 2002	EP
0865004	Jul., 2002	EP
1109032	Mar., 2003	EP
1300689	Apr., 2003	EP
1331620	Jul., 2003	EP
1345044	Sep., 2003	EP
1369704	Dec., 2003	EP
1302920	Feb., 2004	EP
1396832	Mar., 2004	EP
1406228	Apr., 2004	EP
1070968	May., 2004	EP
1431946	Jun., 2004	EP
1467575	Oct., 2004	EP
1471365	Oct., 2004	EP
0903589	Nov., 2004	EP
1517281	Mar., 2005	EP
1531340	May., 2005	EP
0926510	Aug., 2005	EP
1405286	Sep., 2005	EP
1485730	Sep., 2005	EP
1428195	Oct., 2005	EP
1603098	Dec., 2005	EP
1125415	Jan., 2006	EP
1205732	Mar., 2006	EP
1632787	Mar., 2006	EP
1632892	Mar., 2006	EP
0953261	Jun., 2006	EP
1275975	Jun., 2006	EP
1285232	Jun., 2006	EP
1672384	Jun., 2006	EP
0987562	Jul., 2006	EP
1093564	Nov., 2006	EP
1218694	Nov., 2006	EP
1727094	Nov., 2006	EP
1742170	Jan., 2007	EP
1188137	Feb., 2007	EP
1755356	Feb., 2007	EP
1463002	Apr., 2007	EP
1361555	May., 2007	EP
1798572	Jun., 2007	EP
1410364	Oct., 2007	EP
1843161	Oct., 2007	EP
1860456	Nov., 2007	EP
1884462	Feb., 2008	EP
1101385	Mar., 2008	EP
1901090	Mar., 2008	EP
0964268	Apr., 2008	EP
1483755	Apr., 2008	EP
1906204	Apr., 2008	EP
1912077	Apr., 2008	EP
1331490	Jun., 2008	EP
1942351	Jul., 2008	EP
1327159	Aug., 2008	EP
1436641	Aug., 2008	EP
1953565	Aug., 2008	EP
1483902	Sep., 2008	EP
1965219	Sep., 2008	EP
1972962	Sep., 2008	EP
1975884	Oct., 2008	EP
1118011	Nov., 2008	EP
1995708	Nov., 2008	EP
2000778	Dec., 2008	EP
2001004	Dec., 2008	EP
2023155	Feb., 2009	EP
2708349	Feb., 1995	FR
2791778	Oct., 2000	FR
2881841	Aug., 2006	FR
9-288175	Nov., 1994	JP
6-342061	Dec., 1994	JP
8-146130	May., 1996	JP
9-119983	Nov., 1997	JP
WO9205456	Apr., 1992	WO
WO 94/014251	Jun., 1994	WO
WO9427161	Nov., 1994	WO
WO9428437	Dec., 1994	WO
WO9503598	Feb., 1995	WO
WO9521388	Aug., 1995	WO
WO9605562	Feb., 1996	WO
WO9635961	Nov., 1996	WO
WO9726552	Jul., 1997	WO
WO9747173	Dec., 1997	WO
WO9804965	Feb., 1998	WO
WO9805977	Feb., 1998	WO
WO9814926	Apr., 1998	WO
WO9822834	May., 1998	WO
WO9822923	May., 1998	WO
WO9835311	Aug., 1998	WO
WO9843107	Oct., 1998	WO
WO9849654	Nov., 1998	WO
WO9908251	Feb., 1999	WO
WO9935630	Jul., 1999	WO
WO9942855	Aug., 1999	WO
WO9945519	Sep., 1999	WO
WO 99/50985	Oct., 1999	WO
WO9950985	Oct., 1999	WO
WO9956144	Nov., 1999	WO
WO0023816	Apr., 2000	WO
WO0039775	Jul., 2000	WO
WO0111389	Feb., 2001	WO
WO0133302	May., 2001	WO
WO0148652	Jul., 2001	WO
WO0157550	Aug., 2001	WO
WO0159601	Aug., 2001	WO
WO0163239	Aug., 2001	WO
WO0165276	Sep., 2001	WO
WO0186319	Nov., 2001	WO
WO 0186319	Nov., 2001	WO
WO0194969	Dec., 2001	WO
WO0205245	Jan., 2002	WO
WO0208784	Jan., 2002	WO
WO0215151	Feb., 2002	WO
WO0227275	Apr., 2002	WO
WO02054103	Jul., 2002	WO
WO02059838	Aug., 2002	WO
WO02066288	Aug., 2002	WO
WO02069300	Sep., 2002	WO
WO02075667	Sep., 2002	WO
WO02091312	Nov., 2002	WO
WO02095709	Nov., 2002	WO
WO 02/099769	Dec., 2002	WO
WO02099769	Dec., 2002	WO
WO03013010	Feb., 2003	WO
WO03016937	Feb., 2003	WO
WO03023439	Mar., 2003	WO
WO03027934	Apr., 2003	WO
WO03054830	Jul., 2003	WO
WO03056495	Jul., 2003	WO
WO03060855	Jul., 2003	WO
WO03067281	Aug., 2003	WO
WO03079136	Sep., 2003	WO
WO03081560	Oct., 2003	WO
WO03093775	Nov., 2003	WO
WO03096282	Nov., 2003	WO
WO03098576	Nov., 2003	WO
WO03107299	Dec., 2003	WO
WO2004042418	May., 2004	WO
WO2004068162	Aug., 2004	WO
WO2004109317	Dec., 2004	WO
WO2004114252	Dec., 2004	WO
WO2005038478	Apr., 2005	WO
WO2005052887	Jun., 2005	WO
WO2005081012	Sep., 2005	WO
WO2005081630	Sep., 2005	WO
WO2005114613	Dec., 2005	WO
WO2005121701	Dec., 2005	WO
WO2005017555	May., 2006	WO
WO2006070207	Jul., 2006	WO
WO2006079165	Aug., 2006	WO
WO2006093682	Sep., 2006	WO
WO2006108275	Oct., 2006	WO
WO2006110973	Oct., 2006	WO
WO2006135916	Dec., 2006	WO
WO2006135923	Dec., 2006	WO
WO2007001660	Jan., 2007	WO
WO2007010116	Jan., 2007	WO
WO2007012888	Feb., 2007	WO
WO2007013069	Feb., 2007	WO
WO2007048237	May., 2007	WO
WO2007086899	Aug., 2007	WO
WO2006088554	Sep., 2007	WO
WO2007113469	Oct., 2007	WO
WO2007115246	Oct., 2007	WO
WO2007120588	Oct., 2007	WO
WO2007124300	Nov., 2007	WO
WO2008001117	Jan., 2008	WO
WO2008005012	Jan., 2008	WO
WO2008012377	Jan., 2008	WO
WO2008018088	Feb., 2008	WO
WO2008051292	May., 2008	WO
WO2008053173	May., 2008	WO
WO2008065328	Jun., 2008	WO
WO2008065658	Jun., 2008	WO
WO2008068679	Jun., 2008	WO
WO2008093036	Aug., 2008	WO
WO2008116580	Oct., 2008	WO
WO2008126126	Oct., 2008	WO
WO2008144784	Dec., 2008	WO
WO2008145986	Dec., 2008	WO
WO2009001294	Dec., 2008	WO
WO2009004381	Jan., 2009	WO

Other References

World Airport Week, "Sharing Makes the Airport Go Round" Jan. 21, 1997, p. 1. cited by other .
Huaiying Tan et al. PCL System With Illuminator of Opportunity Proceedings of 2006 CIE International Conference on Radar, vol. 1,Octoebre 16, 2006. cited by other .
Griffiths H D et al., Denial of Bistatic Hosting by Spatial-Temporal Waveform Design IEE Proceedings: Radar, Sonar & Navigation, Institution of Electrical Engineers, GB, vol. 152, No. 2, Apr. 8, 2005. cited by other .
Jafargholi et al, High Accurate Multiple Target Detection in PCL Radar Systems, Radar, 2006, CIE '06. International Conference on, IEEE, PI, Oct. 1, 2006. cited by other .
Terminal, Landing Fees Increase, Dianne Gouliquer, Northern Ontario Business, Sudbury, Apr. 1, 2001, vol. 21, Issue 6, p. 24. cited by other .
Conflict Detection and Resolution for Future Air Transport Management, Jimmy Krozel, Ph.D, Mark E. Peters, and George Hunter, TR 97138-01, NASA Ames Research Center, Contract NAS2-14285, Apr. 1997. cited by other .
ADS-X--Next Generation Surveillance Solutions, Alex Smith, Russell Hulstron, Rannoch Corporation, ATCA Oct. 2006. cited by other .
Transtech Airport Solutions, Inc., http://www.transtech-solutions.com/products/asm/airport.html, Feb. 12, 2009. cited by other .
Eurocontrol Standard Document for Surveillance Interchange Part 14: Category 020, Multilateration Target Reports, SUR.ET1.ST05.2000-STD-14-02, Apr. 2008. cited by other .
ATO Advanced Technology Development and Prototyping Group, http://222.faa.gov/about/office.sub.--org/headquarters.sub.--offices/ato/- service.sub.--units/operations/td/.. Jan. 16, 2008. cited by other .
Form B --Proposal Summary, NASA SBIR 02-1 Solicitation, http://sbir. nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/02/sbir/phase1/SBIR-02-1-A3.01-9714.html Sep. 05, 2002. cited by other .
Form 9B--Project Summary, NASA SBIR 00-1 Soliciation http://sbir.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/00/sbir/phase1/SBIR-00-1-04.01-9704.h- tml Feb. 12, 2009. cited by other .
NASA 1998 SBIR Phase 1, Proposal No. 91-1 01.02-9780B (1998) http://sbir.nasa.gov/SBIR/abstracts/98/sbir/phase1/SBIR-98-1-01.02-9780B.- html. cited by other .
"UK ADS-B in radar environment" (Mark Watson) http://www.eurocontrol.int/cascade/gallery/content/public/documents/Prese- ntations/Session%20%202 %20-%20Trials%20and%20Implementations/Watson%20-%20UK%20ADS-B%20in%20a%20- radar%20environment.pdf (2006). cited by other .
Ground Vehicle Operations on Airports, FAA Advisory Circular AC No. 150/5210-20 Jun. 21, 2002. cited by other .
Airport Pavement Management Systems: An Appraisal of Erxisting Methodologies, Michel Gendreau and Patrrick Soriano;Pergamon Transn Res. A, vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 187-214, 1998. cited by other .
Components of a Pavement Maintenance Management System, Mohamed Y. Shahin, U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Transportaiton Research Record 791, pp. 31-39, 1980. cited by other .
Application of Markov Process to Pavement Management Systems at the Network Level, Abbas Ahmad Butt, University of Iillinois at Urbana-Champaign (1991). cited by other .
Need for Accurate Traffic Data in Pavement Management, John F. Kennedy International Airport Case Studt, Keegan, Handojo, Rada, MACTEX Engineering and Consulting, Inc, 2004 FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference, Apr. 2004. cited by other .
PCL system with illuminator of opportunity, Huaiying tan, Min ren, Bo lie, Jinning Song, Beijing Radar Instiitute, IEEE 0-7803-9582-4/06, Apr. 2006. cited by other .
High Accurate Multiple Target Detection in PCL Radar Systems; Jafargholi, A. Mousavi, M. R. Nayebi, M. M. K. N. Toosi University of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering, Tehran, Iran; Radar, 2006. CIE '06. International Conference on, Oct. 2006, Shanghai, China; ISBN: 07-7803-9583-2. cited by other .
Denial of bistatic hosting by spatial-temporal waveform design; H.D. Griffiths, M.G. Wicks, D. Weinder, R. Adve, P.A. Antonik, and I. Fotinopoulos, IEE Proc. Radar Sonar Navig., vol. 152, No. 2, Apr. 2005. cited by other .
Passive coherent location FPGA implementation of the cross ambiguity function; Kvasnicka, M. Hermanek, A. Kunes, M. Pelant, M. Plsek, R., Proceedings- SPIE The International Society for Optical Engineering; 2006, vol. 6159; Part 1, pp. 615918; International Society for Optical Engineering. cited by other .
Passive coherent location system simulation and evaluation, Proc. SPIE, vol. 6159, 615917 (2006); DOI:10.1117/12.675065 , Apr. 26, 2006 ; Conference Title: Photonics Applications in Astronomy, Communications, Industry, and High-Energy Physics Experiments IV Libor Slezak, Michael Kvasnicka, Martin Pelant, and Jit Vavra ERA a.s. (Czech Republic) Radek Plsek Technical Univ. Of Pardubice (Czech Republic). cited by other .
World Airport Week, "Sharing Makes the Airport Go Round" Jan. 21, 1997, p. 1. cited by other .
Traffic Alert System Technical Design Summary, Final Report, Apr. 1994 (Baldwin et al.). cited by other .
GPS Relative Accuracy for Collision Avoidance, Institute of Navigation Technical Meeting, Jan. 1997 (Rudel et al.). cited by other .
Cassell, R., Smith A., Cohen, B.,M Yang, E., Sleep, B., A Prototype Aircraft Performance Risk Assessment Model, Final Report, Rannoch Corporation, Feb. 28, 2002. cited by other .
Cassell, R., Smith A., Cohen, B., Yang, E., Sleep, B., Esche, J., Aircraft Performance Risk Assessment Model (APRAM), Rannoch Corporation, Nov. 30, 2002. cited by other .
Cox, E., A., Fuzzy Logic For Business and Industry, Charles River Media, 1995, Chapter 5. cited by other .
Smith, A., Cassell, R., Cohen, B., An approach to Aircraft Performance Risk Assessment Modeling, Final Report, Rannoch Corporation, Mar. 1999. cited by other .
M.L. Wood and R. W. Bush, "Multilateration on Mode S and ATCRBS Signals at Atlanta's Hartsfield Airport", Lincoln Laboratory, M.I.T., Jan. 8, 1998. cited by other .
AERMOD: Description of Model Formulation (Version 02222) EPA 454/R-02-002d, Oct. 21, 2002. cited by other .
FAA Integrated Noise Model, www.faa.gov, current release INM 6.1 (Mar. 4, 2003). cited by other .
"Flight Explorer News: Flight Explorer and Lochard Team to Provide Enhanced Flight Tracking for Cutomers Worldwide", Apr. 28, 2003, http://www.flightexplorer/com/News/press%20releases/pr042803.asp. cited by other .
Source Code received by Rannoch Corp. from FAA, circa 1998. cited by other .
"A Routine that converts an American Mode S address into its corresponding `N` number string", Ken Banis, Feb. 17, 1992. cited by other .
"Description of the U.S. Algorithm for Assigning Mode A Addresses", Robert D. Grappel, M.I.T. Lincoln Laboratory, Nov. 1991. cited by other .
"Program to convert Mode S address to U.S. Tail Number", R.D. Grappel, M.I.T. Lincoln Laboratory, 1991. cited by other .
"Program to convert U.S. aircraft tail numbers to Mode S code", R.D. Grappel, M.I.T. Lincoln Laboratory, 1991. cited by other .
"ADSE and Multilateration Mode-S Data Fusion for Location and Identification on Airport Surface", J.G. Herraro J.A. Portas, F.J. Rodriguez,(IEEE 1999 Radar Conference Proceedings, pp. 315-320, Apr. 20-22, 1999). cited by other .
D.C. Rickard, D.J.Sherry, S.J.Taylor, "The development of a prototype aircraft-height monitoring unit utilising an SSR -based difference in time of arrival technique", International Conference Radar 92 (Conf. Publ. No. 365), 1992, p. 250-3. cited by other .
D. E. Manolakis and C. C. Lefas, "Aircraft geometric height computation using secondary surveillance radar range differences," IEE Proceedings-F, Radar, Sonar, Navigation, vol. 141, No. 2, pp. 139-148, 1994. cited by other .
Request for Proposal for Acquisition of Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System (NOMS), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Oct. 21, 2003. cited by other .
Technical Specifications, for Aircraft Flight Track and Noise Management System for the Regional Airport Authority of Louisville and Jefferson County, Harris Miller, Miller & Hanson Inc. 15 New England Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803 HMMH Report No. 298950, May 16, 2003. cited by other .
"Overview of the FAA ADS-B Link Decision", John Scardina, Director, Office of System Architecture and Investment Analysis, Federal Aviation Administration, Jun. 7, 2002. cited by other .
"Ground -Based Transceiver (GBT) for Broadcast Services Using the Universal Access Transceiver (UAT) Data Link", FAA-E-2973, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Jan. 15, 2004. cited by other .
"Wide Area Multilateration Report on EATMP TRS 131/04 Version 1.1", NLR-CR-2004-472, Roke Manor, Nov. 2004. cited by other .
J.G. Herrero, J. A. B. Portas, F.J.J. Rodriguez, J.R.C. Corredera, ASDE and Multilateration Mode-S Data Fusion for Location and Identification on Airport Surface, (IEEE 1999 Radar Conf. Proc., pp. 315-320, Apr. 20-22, 1999). cited by other .
D.C. Rickard, D.J. Sherry, S.J. Taylor, The development of a prototype aircraft-height monitoring unit utilizing an SSR -based difference in time of arrival technique, Int'l Conference Radar 92 (Conf. Publ. No. 365), 1992, p. 250-3. cited by other .
D. E. Manolakis and C. C. Lefas, Aircraft geometric height computation using secondary surveillance radar range differences, IEE Proceedings-F, Radar, Sonar, Navigation, vol. 141, No. 2, pp. 139-148, 1994. cited by other .
GPS Risk Assessment Study, Final Report, T.M. Corrigan et al., Johns Hopkins Univ., Applied Physics Laboratory, Jan. 1999. cited by other .
ASA MASPS--Change Issue, James Maynard, Oct. 21, 2002. cited by other .
ADS-B, Automatic Dependent Surveillance--Broadcast Will ADS-B Increase Safety and Security for Aviation?, Mar. 1999, revised Jul. 2000, Darryl H. Phillips AirSport Corporation, 1100 West Cherokee Sallisaw OK 74955. cited by other .
ASA MASPS--Change Issue, Greg Stayton, Aug. 1, 2002. cited by other .
ASA MASPS--Change Issue, Michael Petri, Oct. 23, 2002. cited by other .
ASA MASPS--Change Issue, J. Stuart Searight, Nov. 18, 2002. cited by other .
ASA MASPS--Change Issue, Michael Petri, Dec. 16, 2002. cited by other .
Protest Letter dated May 16, 2002 from Otto M. Wildensteiner, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. cited by other .
"Comparison of Claims in U.S. Appl. No. 09/971,672 with Prior Art", May 16, 2002, Otto M. Wildensteiner, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. cited by other .
"Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards for Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B)", RCTA, Inc. Washington, DC, .COPYRGT. 1998. cited by other .
"Runway Incursion Reduction Program Dallas-Ft. Worth Formal Evaluation Report, Final Report", Trios Associates, Inc. Dec. 21, 2000. cited by other .
"TIS-B DFW Application for Airport Surface Situational Awareness", Trios Associates, Inc., Sep. 6, 2000. cited by other .
"A Prototype Transceiver for Evaluating An Integrated Broadcast Data Link Architecture", Chris Moody & Warrent Wilson, RCTA SC-186, Aug. 17, 1995, TRCA Paper No. 449-95/SC186-033. cited by other .
"The Universal Access Transceiver (UAT)", Warren Wilson & Chris Moody, May 10, 1995. cited by other .
"Terminal Area Productivity (TAP) Study Low Visibility Landing and Surface Operations (LVLASO) Demonstration Report" Surface Surveillance Products Team (AND-410) Sep. 4, 1998. cited by other .
"Phase I--Operational Evaluation Final Report Cargo Airline Association ADS-B Program, FAA SafeFlight 21 Program" Apr. 10, 2000. cited by other .
"Capstone Program Plan Version 1.0", Federal Aviation Administration, Mar. 10, 1999. cited by other .
"TIS-B Concept and Approach", MITRE, Chris Moody, Feb. 29, 2000. cited by other .
"RTCA Special Committee 186, Working Group 5 ADS-B UAT MOPS Meeting #2, Proposed Contents and Transmission Rates for ADS-B Messages" Chris Moody, MITRE Corp., Feb. 20, 2001. cited by other .
"Airborne Information Initiatives: Capitalizing on a Multi-Purpose Broadcast Communications Architecture", R.C. Strain, J.C. Moody, E.C. Hahn, B.E. Dunbar, S. Kavoussi, J.P. Mittelman, Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Oct. 1995. cited by other .
"Minutes of SC-186 WG-2 (TIS-B) Meeting", Jun. 13-14, 2000. cited by other .
Airfield Pavement: Keeping Nations Runways in Good Condition Could Require Substantially higher Spending, GAO/RCED-98-226, Jul. 1998. cited by other .
Albany International Airport Pavement Management System, Albany, New York, Albany International Airport GIS -Based Pavement and Facilities Management , Fall, 2002. cited by other .
Albany International Aiport, New York, Uses GIS for Pavement Management, Lena Weber, Ph.D., GIS Manager, and Pat Rooney, GIS/GPS Technician, C.T. Male Associates, Summer, 2002, http://www.esri.com/news/arcnews/summer02articles/albany-airport.html. cited by other .
Micropaver, Dr. M.Y. Shahin, CECER-CFF Champaign, IL May 2, 2005. cited by other .
Raytheon Systems Limited Launches A Unique Solution For ADS-B, Jan. 19, 2005, Raytheon Corp. http://www.raytheon.co.uk/highlights/ATMS.html. cited by other .
Raytheon Systems Liminted's ADS-B Solution Prised by International SIR TZRAFFIC Authorities, Feb. 2, 2005, http://www.raytheon.co.uk/news.sub.--room/news/press.sub.--02022005.pdf. cited by other .
Boeing Subsidiary and Megadata Announce Joint Marketing Agreement, Press Release, Aug. 7, 2003. cited by other .
Federal Airways & Airspace Inc. Because Accuracy Matters. Feb. 2003. Jan. 2002. cited by other .
VDL4 TM Alignment With DO-242A (RTCA ADS-B MASPS) WG51/SG2, NASA, Sep. 2003. cited by other .
Method to Provide System-Wide ADS-B Back-up, Validation, and Security, A. Smith et al. 25.sup.th AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference Oct. 15, 2006. cited by other .
Positive Identification of Aircraft on Surface Movement Area--Results of FAA Trials, 10th Annual International AeroSense Symposium, Orlando, Florida, Apr. 1996. cited by other .
Surveilliance Monitoring of Parallel Precision Approaches in a Free Flight Environment, AIAA 16th Annual Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Oct. 1997. cited by other .
Analysis of ADS-B, ASDE-3 and Multilateration Surveillance Performance--NASA Atlanta Demonstration Presented at the AIAA 17th Annual Digital Avionics Systems Conference in Oct. 1998. cited by other .
Application of ADS-B for Airport Surface Surveillance, Daniel Hicok, Derrick Lee IEEE AIAA 17.sup.th Annual Digital Avionics Conference, 1998. cited by other .
Atlanta Hartsfield International Airport--Results of FAA Trials to Accurately Locate/Identify Aircraft on the Airport Movement Area, IEEE Plans, Atlanta, GA, Apr 1996. cited by other .
Evaluation of Airport Surface Surveillance Technologies, IEEE Radar 96 conference, Beijing, China, Oct. 1996. cited by other .
Improved Location/Identification of Aircraft/Ground Vehicles on Airport Movement Areas--Results of FAA Trials, Institute of Navigation in Santa Monica, CA, Jan. 1996. cited by other .
Sensis News, http://www.sensis.com/docs/128/ .COPYRGT. 1999-2006. cited by other .
Roke Radar, Design and development of miniature radars and fuze sensors through to major radar programme builds, http://www.roke.co.uk/skills/radar/, .COPYRGT. 2006. cited by other .
Acoustic System for Aircraft Detection and Tracking, based on Passive Microphone Arrays. Caronna, Rosello, Testa, 148.sup.th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, http://pcfite.ing.uniroma1.it/upload/research/4psp71107948 2021710.pdf Nov. 2004. cited by other .
Cei-Loc How We Do it, Technology Overview, http://www.cell-ioc.com-how.sub.--tech.html, Oct. 2, 2006 (original date unknown). cited by other .
Super-Radar, Done Dirt Cheap, http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03.sub.--42/b3854113.htm BusinessWeek Online, Oct. 20, 2003. cited by other .
Methods To Provide System-Wide ADS-B Back-up, Validation and Security, A. Smith, R. Cassell, T. Breen, R. Hulstrom, C. Evers, 25.sup.th AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Oct. 15, 2006. cited by other .
Damarel Systems International, LTD, Travel Automation Specialists, .COPYRGT. 2004, www.dameral.com. cited by other .
Airfield Pavement Computer Software, Mar. 23, 2005, Transport Canada https://www.tc.gc.ca/CivilAviation/International/Technical/Pavement/softw- are.htm. cited by other .
ARA Transportation, .COPYRGT. 2004, http:/www.araworldwide.com/expertise/industry/transportation.htm. cited by other .
The Twilight Zone, Can Wide-Area Multilateration Systems Become A Nightmare for MSSR Producers? Aircraft Traffic Technology International 2005, Vladimir Manda, Viktor Sotona. cited by other .
Safety, Performance, and Interoperability Requirements Document for ADS-B NRA Application, European Organisation for Civil Avaiation Equipment, Dec. 2005. cited by other .
Passive Surveillance Using Multilateration, Roke Manor Research website (2003). cited by other .
Letter from Marc Morgan, Siemens, Feb. 10, 2006. cited by other .
Required Navigation Performance (RNP) and Area Navigation (RNAV), Boeing, Aug. 2000. cited by other .
System-Wide ADS-B Back-Up and Validation, A. Smith, R. Cassell, T. Breen, R. Hulstrom, C. Evers, 2006 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference. cited by other .
Required Navigation Performance (RNP) Another step towards global implementation of CNS/ATM, Anita Trotter-Cox, Assessment Compliance Group, Inc. Published in Professional Pilot Magazine, Jun. 1999. cited by other.

Primary Examiner: Phan; Dao L
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Bell; Robert Platt

Parent Case Text

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/492,711, filed Jul. 25, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference; This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/429,926, filed on May 8, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference; This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/343,079, filed on Jan. 30, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference; This application is also a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/342,289 filed Jan. 28, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference; This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/209,030, filed on Aug. 22, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference; This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/257,416, filed on Oct. 24, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference; This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/203,823 filed Aug. 15, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference; This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 1/145,170 filed on Jun. 6, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference; This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/743,042 filed Dec. 23, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference; application Ser. No. 10/743,042 is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/638,524 filed Aug. 12, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference; application Ser. No. 10/638,524 is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/516,215 filed Feb. 29, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference; application Ser. No. 09/516,215 claims is a Non Prov. of Provisional U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/123,170 filed Mar. 5, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference; application Ser. No. 10/743,042 is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/319,725 filed Dec. 16, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference. Application Ser. No. 10/743,042 is a Non Prov. of Provisional U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/440,618 filed Jan. 17, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.

Claims

We claim:

1. A method for extending aircraft tracking from airport movement areas comprising one or more of taxiways and runways to non-movement areas comprising one or more of hangers, ramps and aprons, where aircraft position is previously detected and the aircraft previously identified in the movement area, the method comprising the steps of: detecting a signal from the aircraft, determining position of the aircraft from the signal from the aircraft, associating the signal from the aircraft with the previous identification of the aircraft by comparing the previous detected position of the aircraft with the determined position of the aircraft, and generating a track for the aircraft from a movement area into non-movement area using the signal from the aircraft.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the signal from the aircraft comprises one or more of an audio radio communications signal, a transponder signal, a cellular telephone signal, an ACARS signal, a CPDLC signal, a MLAT signal, a UAT signal, a UHF signal, a VHF signal, data link signal, an ADS signal, an acoustic signal, an optical signal, an interrogation signal, a radar signal, or any other emitter.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: detecting a signal from the aircraft in a non-movement area comprising the one or more of hangers, ramps and aprons, determining position of the aircraft from the signal from the aircraft, generating a track for the aircraft in the non-movement area comprising one or more of hangers, ramps and aprons, receiving a detected aircraft position and identification when the aircraft moves from a non-movement area to movement area, associating the signal from the aircraft with the detected identification of the aircraft in the movement area by comparing the determined position of the aircraft with the detected position of the aircraft in the movement area, and merging the track for the aircraft from the non-movement area into the movement area.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of: determining, from the signal from the aircraft, an identification of the aircraft; and comparing the identification of the aircraft with the previous identification of the aircraft, and detecting any discrepancy thereof.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to the field of aircraft and ground vehicle tracking and surveillance. The present invention is directed toward methods, techniques and apparatus to extend the positive identification and tracking of aircraft from movement areas into the non-movement areas.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Prior Art air traffic control systems are geared up to track planes in the air and on runway surface areas to optimize efficiency and provide safety. Safety is assured by "separation" whereby air traffic controllers employ various procedures and technologies to make sure that aircraft are physically separated by a minimum distance. At most airports, the responsibility of air traffic control starts and stops at the entrance or exit to the runway movement areas, which are taxiways and runways.

This is a practical matter, and in the non-movement areas, such as hangers, ramps, and aprons, aircraft movements and separation are no longer the responsibility of air traffic control, but is the responsibility of other parties such as the airport itself, airlines, or other parties. The use of tracking technologies for air traffic control is therefore focused on the movement areas, not the non-movement areas, where there are limitations in aircraft tracking. Furthermore, many of the aircraft transmitting devices are switched off in non-movement areas exacerbating tracking problems in these areas.

Airport airside operations are conducted on movement areas and non-movement areas. Movement areas refer to the airport's runways and taxiways and non-movement areas refer to the aprons, ramps, maintenance facilities, de icing facilities and other areas. One of the main differences between movement and non-movement areas is that usually Air Traffic Control (ATC) is responsible for separation and safety of aircraft in the movement areas, whereas the airport or other organization is responsible for operations in the non-movement areas. This is exemplified at a typical airport where the airport's ramp management will authorize an aircraft for push back, and the aircraft will taxi to a point at the edge of the controlled movement area, and the pilot will then contact ATC by radio to request clearance to proceed into the movement area for departure.

Movement and non-movement areas are described the RNP report Development of Airport Surface Required Navigation Performance (RNP), by Rick Cassell, Alex Smith, and Dan Hicok, Rannoch Corporation, Alexandria, Va. (NASA/CR-1999-209109, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va. 23681-2199, Prepared for Langley Research Center under Contract NAS1-19214), incorporated herein by reference. FIG. 1 is taken from the Cassell et al., reference and illustrates, in a simplified form, the airport movement areas, and, enclosed within dashed lines, the non-movement areas.

Since Air Traffic Control (ATC) is responsible for the movement areas, the air traffic control infrastructure is optimized to provide communications, navigation, and surveillance in the movement areas, not the non-movement areas. Therefore at a typical larger airport there exists aircraft tracking and identification systems providing generally good coverage over the movement parts of an airport, but generally not throughout the non-movement areas.

The technologies that are currently used at airports for tracking in the movement areas are classified as cooperative, primary active, and passive. Cooperative technologies interact with devices on the aircraft, primary active technologies do not interact but use a form of transmission to reflect signals from aircraft, and passive technologies are receive only. Passive can include reception of any electromagnetic, radio, or radar transmission from an aircraft including, but not limited to those for communication, navigation, and surveillance, including signals that may be reflected from the aircraft.

Cooperative technologies include transponder-based systems such as ADS-B and multilateration as described in the following papers, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Analysis of ADS-B, ASDE-3 and Multilateration Surveillance Performance--NASA Atlanta Demonstration Presented at the AIAA 17th Annual Digital Avionics Systems Conference in October, 1998. Application of ADS-B for Airport Surface Surveillance, AIAA 17th Annual Digital Avionics Systems Conference, October 1998. Surveillance Monitoring of parallel Precision Approaches in a Free Flight Environment, AIAA 16th Annual Digital Avionics Systems Conference, October 1997. Evaluation of Airport Surface Surveillance Technologies, IEEE Radar 96 conference, Beijing, China, October 1996. This paper reviews the evolving requirements for airport surveillance systems, particularly the use of the Required Surveillance Performance (RSP) concept. Positive Identification of Aircraft on Surface Movement Area--Results of FAA Trials, 10th Annual International AeroSense Symposium, Orlando, Fla., April 1996 Atlanta Hartsfield International Airport--Results of FAA Trials to Accurately Locate/Identify Aircraft on the Airport Movement Area, IEEE PLANS, Atlanta, Ga., April 1996. Improved Location/Identification of Aircraft/Ground Vehicles on Airport Movement Areas--Results of FAA Trials, Institute of Navigation in Santa Monica, Calif., January 1996.

In 2000, in the United States, the FAA awarded a contract to Sensis for a surface multilateration system under the program name of ASDE X. The Airport Surface Detection Equipment-Model X (ASDE-X) program was initiated in 1999 and Sensis Corporation was selected as the vendor in the year 2000. The Senate Committee on Appropriations, in its report on FAA's fiscal year (FY) 2006 appropriations, expressed concern about the pace of ASDE-X deployment and reported the FAA has not yet deployed systems to more than half of the planned sites due to changes in system design and additional requirements.

The FAA originally planned to complete ASDE-X deployment to second-tier airports (e.g., Orlando International Airport and Milwaukee General Mitchell International Airport) by FY 2007 as a low-cost alternative to Airport Surface Detection Equipment-3 (ASDE-3) radar systems, which are deployed at larger, high-volume airports. However, the FAA now plans to complete deployment by FY 2009, a two-year delay. While the FAA has already procured 36 out of 38 ASDE-X systems, only 3 systems have been commissioned for operational use as of late 2005. As of 2005, the FAA has invested about $250 million in ASDE-X and expects to spend a total of $505 million to complete the program. A map of planned ASDE-X installations (from www.asdex.net, see http://www.sensis.com/docs/128/) as well as upgrades to the older ASDE-3 systems is illustrated in FIG. 2.

Primary technologies include Radar systems such as X-Band radar (see www.terma.com, incorporated herein by reference), as well as millimeter wave radar (see www.flight-refuelling.com, www.qinetic.com, and www.transtech-solutions.com, incorporated herein by reference). Some companies also use a combination of active sensors for detecting items on airport surfaces, for example debris. Roke Manor has a mobile system as detailed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/494,271, Publication No. 20050046569, entitled "Detection of undesired objects on surfaces" published Mar. 3, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference. Qinetiq has an active system slated for Vancouver Airport to detect runway debris (See, www.qinetic.com, incorporated herein by reference).

Passive technologies include inductive loops buried in the surface as well as camera technology, both of which are described in the following papers, both of which are incorporated herein by reference: Inductive Loop Sensor Subsystem (LSS) as a Supplemental Surface Surveillance System --Demonstration Results, AIAA 19th Annual Digital Avionics Systems Conference, October 2000. Evaluation of FLIR/IR Camera Technology for Airport Surface Surveillance, 10th Annual International AeroSense Symposium in Orlando, Fla., April 1996.

Existing techniques for runway occupancy determination include the use of zones as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,927,701, entitled "Runway occupancy monitoring and warning," issued Aug. 9, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. Techniques for passive tracking using "bounced" signals include Roke Manor's triangulation techniques as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,930,638, entitled "Passive moving object detection system and method using signals transmitted by a mobile telephone station," issued Aug. 16, 2005, and also incorporated herein by reference.

Given the delays in the rollout of the ASDE-X program, as well as questions as to its operability, other techniques may be required to insure that aircraft can be accurately tracked throughout an airport, in movement and non-movement areas. Collisions between aircraft and other aircraft, service vehicles, buildings, or the like, can have devastating consequences, even at taxiing speeds. Moreover, even minor damage caused by such collisions may require expensive repairs and delay flights considerably. A system is needed which can accurately track aircraft in both movement and non-movement areas, which does not necessarily rely upon a single signal or technology. Such a system should be robust, redundant, inexpensive, and easy to install.

Cell phones, PDAs and other personal communication devices may soon have no limits on their use on airplanes. If regulations allow, cell phones and other radio devices may be approved for in-flight use during most or all phases of flight. If this use is allowed, then an additional set of radio signals may be emitting from an aircraft. In addition, some phones have added a GPS chip to aid in determining their locations and for compliance with the enhanced 911 requirements.

Air France is slated to trial OnAir passenger mobile phone use. Air France will take delivery of an A318 fitted with OnAir equipment in early 2007 that will enable the use of passenger mobile phones in-flight. The airline will then use the aircraft to conduct a six-month commercial trial using the new service on short-haul flights within Europe and to and from North Africa.

The OnAir service will allow Air France passengers to use their own GSM (global system for mobile communications) phones and GPRS (general packet radio service)-enabled devices such as the Blackberry or Treo, to make and receive voice calls or to send and receive SMS (short message service) communications, or emails during the flight, without inferring with critical aircraft systems.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed toward methods, techniques and apparatus to extend the positive identification and tracking of aircraft from movement areas into the non-movement areas. By using the data fusion process pioneered by Rannoch Corporation, assignee of the present application, a number of different signal sources may be used to provide aircraft tracking information for both movement and non-movement areas in and near an airport (as well as in flight). Such a system does not need to rely upon a single signal source, such as a transponder. Thus, if a pilot turns off a transponder upon landing, the system may still be able to track such an aircraft on the ground, using other signals emanating from, or reflected by, the aircraft.

In one aspect of the present invention, a system or systems, for determining an aircraft's position and/or identification, composed of the following data sources and combinations of these sources: Single AirScene sensor combined with optical sensor or sensors Multilateration in combination with optical sensor or sensors Optical sensor or sensors combined with ADS-B data ASDI (ETMS) combined with optical sensor and MLat ASDI (ETMS) combined with optical and single sensor Collocated AirScene sensor or sensors and optical sensor or sensors Voice recognition for registration number (previous Rannoch patent) combined with optical sensor or sensors UAT 978 MHz/1090 MHz transmissions combined with optical sensor or sensors Passive broadband and narrowband multilateration using the TDOA principle for a variety of high frequency aircraft signals including data link, DME, SSR, search, target, and weather radar, and other emitters. Logs (either electronic or hand written) from FBOs, airport personnel, catering or other operators at the airport that describe which aircraft were where and when they were there. Logs include registration number and time from which landing or departure time could be determined.

The comparison of one, or a combination of the sources above would result in a dynamic performance assessment of the accuracy of any of the sources relative to the others or known good source or sources. Such a system could be used to rate how well an identification is known and those not well known could be submitted for human intervention.

Prevalent aircraft and commercial technologies rely on analog and digital communications from the aircraft and other sources at the airport. For example, it was reported in the Journal of Air Traffic Control in 2005 that a possible source of surface accidents was due to proximate communicating with ATC and airport authorities on separate discrete analog frequencies, known to various parties at the airport but unknown to each other. In one embodiment of the present invention, by monitoring frequency use around an airport, it is possible to identify, on automated basis, if aircraft, within the same zone, are using different communications frequencies and therefore possibly unaware of one another. In addition to VHF analog or digital communications, possible channels of communication include reception of various communications signals emanating from the aircraft including ACARS and CPDLC.

In another embodiment of the present invention, commercial cell phones and other personal communication devices provide another source of aircraft position information in the non-movement area. Depending on the aviation authority, cell phones are permitted for use at the gate, the non-movement area, or the movement areas. It is anticipated that that cell phones may shortly be approved for use in all phases of flight.

Presently, however, at the very least, cell phones become active when an aircraft's wheels touch down in the movement area. By correlating an aircraft ID and at least one onboard cell phone on board (the aircraft and cell phone have the same position, speed, and direction) before the aircraft's transponder is turned off, it can be tracked all the way to the gate by following the cell phone, even if the aircraft turns off its transponder. This form of cell phone tracking can be used as a backup to other tracking techniques, as there may be situations where no cell phones are active on a given aircraft during taxiing. Logic may be used to associate a group of cell phones being tracked with an aircraft. Cell phones may be associated with aircraft based on multiple parameters such as location, time, speed, direction, and other factors.

The use of cell phones in an aircraft tracking system extends the ability to track the aircraft by 1) determining which airplane a given cell phone is on by using the fusion of multiple tracking sources; 2) tagging that aircraft with the aircraft identification information for the duration of the flight; and 3) using constantly updated cell phone tracking services and systems to maintain GPS track of aircraft from gate to gate.

For example, some phones have added a GPS chip to aid in determining their locations and for compliance with the enhanced 911 requirements. The cell phone companies or the services that access their data may get updates from a number of these types of phones while they are operating from the airplanes. This data may provide a highly accurate flight track of the aircraft via the cell phone network for the entire flight and all ground movements. The technology used to transmit the cell phone calls from on board the plane will be transmitting for the entire flight to maintain the service. Multilateration techniques may be used to track this known source even after the 1090 MHz transponder has been turned off in the non-movement or gate areas.

The enhanced 911 system requirements have spawned a lot of investment in cell phone location systems. Some are based on embedded GPS chips in the phones while others use triangulation/multilateration. There are a number of companies that provide location services by contracting with the cell phone providers and many state transportation systems are using this type of system to identify traffic backups based on the cell phones. This information may be used to track aircraft in the present invention. Likewise other devices using various transmissions such as 80211 devices may be tracked and associated with an aircraft.

An example of third party cell location service provider is illustrated at http://www.cell-loc.com/how_tech.html, incorporated herein by reference.

Note that in the cell phone tracking embodiment of the present invention, idea, it is not necessary to track any particular or known individual (in most instances), only to determine the anonymous location, speed, direction of as many phones as possible that are tracking together, indicating they are all on the same vehicle, or those that are tracking along with the know location of a vehicle. This applies to the tracking on the surface as well as in the air. The present invention may operate interactively with cell phone tracking systems to discover coincident targets and assign an identification based on the location and identification data from other independent sources. This track would be maintained as long as possible or until a certain condition was met. Thus, privacy concerns of individual cell phone users are protected.

For example, once it is determined that a number of phones are tracking together and/or those particular phones are located at the same location and have the same speed and direction as a vehicle identified by the system through other means, those phones are assigned to that vehicle and their positional information and any available vehicle identification information is grouped, tracked, and stored in the system. In the case of an airplane, the system could be set to terminate the tracking when phones were no longer on the same vehicle or the location of the vehicle was determined to be at the terminus of its travels.

Other passive tracking technologies useful for tracking aircraft on the ground as part of the transition from movement to non-movement areas are described in Super-Radar, Done Dirt Cheap, http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03.sub.--42/b3854113.htm Business Week Online, Oct. 20, 2003, incorporated herein by reference. This technology is not able to determine the details of the aircraft it is tracking, but once this data is integrated into the present invention the aircraft may be tagged up with its identification information from our other sources.

Aircraft also continuously emit signals from on-board navigation devices such as Distance Measurement Equipment (DME). While these signals do not identify a specific aircraft they do contribute to the overall track update. Once an aircraft has been identified by other signals (e.g., transponder or any other emissions from the aircraft or reflected by the aircraft) and a track established, these other signals, such as DME signals, can be used to maintain the track, even if the transponder is turned off. Information on the operation of DME is provided in http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/AIM/, incorporated herein by reference.

In another embodiment of the present invention, aircraft may be tracked using reflected cell phone signals. Some organizations have researched the use of passive cell phone Radar. For example, Roke Manor Research, has developed a system (called CellDar as a trade mark by Roke Manor) for tracking cars on highways as documented in the flowing web pages, all of which are incorporated herein by reference: http://www.roke.co.uk/sensors/stealth/celldar_traffic.asp http://www.roke.co.uk/sensors/stealth/cell_phone_radar_concept.asp http://www.roke.co.uk/sensors/stealth/celldar_coastal.asp http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,811027,00.html (Note that some of these web pages appear to have been removed. However, discussion of CELLDAR can still be found at Roke RADAR, Design and development of miniature radars and fuze sensors through to major radar programme builds, http://www.roke.co.uk/skills/radar/, .COPYRGT. 2006, also incorporated herein by reference).

In one embodiment of the present invention passive cell phone radar is applied as another aircraft source of position and velocity of the aircraft, which may be combined with other data to produce an aircraft track.

Optical systems have been employed to identify and track aircraft, with limited success. One of the issues with optical systems is the accuracy of the system, taking into account the many variables in terms of tail number size, placement, dynamic position with regard to camera, lighting, weather and other issues. Therefore, many vendors of these systems require that a human be in loop to do the identification or verify the automatic identification in cases where the computer was not able to do recognize the registration number with a high probability.

Using a combination of Mode S decoding, through ADS, multilateration, single sensor, ETMS, ASDI, broadband multilateration or airport systems such as gate management systems, it is possible to simultaneously decode an aircraft's tail number using multiple flight tracking and optical techniques. For those aircraft equipped with Mode S, the complete and integrated system can track its own performance by comparing the electronic decode of registration number to the optical decode. The integration of multiple tracking sources, with an optical system also allows the optimization of the optical system and reduces the cost of such a system by minimizing the amount of human intervention required. Only those aircraft not already recognized by the other methods and not automatically recognized by the optical tracking system would require the expense of human involvement.

For example, a Mode S equipped aircraft departs from a particular airport. That aircraft's registration number is easily recognized and tracked by the MLAT or ADS systems. The optical system also detects the aircraft and but might not automatically recognize the registration number with a high degree of accuracy. In an optical only system, this aircraft ID would be flagged as missed or low confidence and a human operator would then have to physically look at the pictures to try to determine the registration number. If the optical system were integrated with other tracking sources that did make a positive identification, this aircraft would not be flagged by the system and no human would be required to manually read the registration number. This embodiment significantly improves the efficiency and capacity of an operator who would have wasted time to visually review photographic data for an aircraft that was already positively identified by other means.

The system may also be used to detect cases when the aircraft was squawking a registration number that was different than that painted on the side of the aircraft. Warnings would be automatically generated and sent to the owner/operator or to the authorities.

Comparison of the different registration number acquisition techniques at a particular airport during a specific time period, during specific conditions (weather, lighting, etc.) may show that the optical system operates with a high performance for the known Mode S aircraft it may be practical to skip or reduce the level of human-in-the-loop review for non Mode S aircraft during these particular periods. This measured confidence in the optical recognition system may vary as conditions changed and when the confidence fell below a certain level, the system may automatically call for more human intervention. This kind of dynamic performance measurement allows the operator to focus on other tasks and increase the efficiency and capacity of that operator. The converse is also true. During bad visual conditions, the dynamic performance measurement results will indicate a poor performance from the optical system. This feedback would warn the optical system that its performance was degrading and different optimizations could be tried until the percent positively recognized, as calibrated against known good identifications from the flight tracking system, improved.

A history of performance for each device under each condition will also help determine where and when to improve the system. For instance, some optical devices may work perfectly with high accuracy where others do not. Different systems could be fitted until the performance was improved and verified in real world conditions through comparison with the flight-tracking database.

An integrated system that can positively track the arrival and/or departure of a high percentage of aircraft can be used to reliably monitor the activity of an individual aircraft. The integration of aircraft ID and tracking systems with logs of fuel use and filed flight plans will allow the system to automatically detect and identify discrepancies in the data based on the know performance characteristics of an individual aircraft.

The system may also be used to wam/notify the operator that an aircraft of interest is landing or departing. This is useful for catching scofflaws, slow payers, non-payers, or any aircraft operator of interest based on the information in the system. Using multiple installations and fusing ETMS data, billing data, FBO data etc., the system can tell where an aircraft went, if it went were it was supposed to, if it used an appropriate amount of fuel to get there, and the like. Applications include law enforcement, security, on the spot debt collection and the like.

For example, through its various data sources, the system determines a particular aircraft is about to land or take off. The operator/owner of this aircraft is over due with a use fee payment. The system may automatically warn on-field operations that this aircraft was active and the debt could be collected immediately while still on the field. This warning message may be sent by electronic means or voice commands and could include the amount of the debt and the aircraft's exact location.

Security applications may include the detection of aircraft whose fuel use, as determined through acquisition of the fuel use figures from the airport's fuel supplier, did not match the origin destination as filed on their flight plan. This would indicate that the aircraft deviated from the flight plan, possibly for illicit purposes.

The following references, all of which are incorporated herein by reference, are related to acoustic and vibration tracking of aircraft in the air and on the ground: http://www.arl.army.mil/cgi-bin/tto/dtttest/db.pl?db=default&view_records- =2&ID=1076 Acoustic System for Aircraft Detection and Tracking, based on Passive Microphone Arrays. Caronna, Rosello, Testa, 148th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, http://pcfite.ing.uniromal.it/upload/research/4psp71107948 2021710.pdf November 2004 Michel, U.S. Pat. No. 4,811,308, issued Mar. 7, 2989.

The output from these types of systems, when combined and fused with the other sources of aircraft tracking information already included in the AirScene.TM. system, provides another independent source of positional information that can be compared and contrasted with the tracking data from other sources to improve the capability of the system to track aircraft. Seismic tracking should be mentioned along with acoustic tracking. They are related to each other and to the multilateration techniques used by the AirScene.TM. and VERA-E systems to determine an aircraft's location by tracking the energy it emits or reflects.

Depending on the airport, Mode S identification can positively identify between 10% and 99% of the aircraft operating at or in the vicinity of the airport. Those not able to be positively identified by Mode S include aircraft squawking the wrong data, aircraft not equipped with Mode S technology (such as general aviation aircraft), foreign aircraft, and the like. But even these non Mode S aircraft are tracked by the multilateration system and stored as tracks with an unknown or non unique identification.

Utilizing the Mode S identification and tracking system to optimize the optical identification process was discussed previously but that such a system can also be used to augment identification data for the non Mode S aircraft tracked by the multilateration system. If an unidentified, but tracked aircraft, is also captured and identified by an optical tracking system or other system or method, the identification data can be positively associated to the flight track based on factors such as, but not limited to, time, location, speed, and runway. This feed back of identification data back into the multilateration system can significantly increase the identification capture rate and accuracy of the multilateration or other electronic aircraft tracking system.

Such a system can work in real time or in a post processing mode, depending on the time required for the non real-time tracking and identification system to determine the identification of the aircraft and for that data to be processed and associated with a captured flight track. The use of such a system significantly improves the tracking of non Mode S aircraft and would be especially useful at small airports, general aviation airports, or military airports where there is a higher percentage of non Mode S aircraft.

Other aircraft tracking systems also benefit from this method of identifying aircraft. Systems that track aircraft using methods that have no means of identifying an aircraft may benefit significantly from identification data supplied by these other means. Systems such as VERA-E system manufactured by ERA in the Czech Republic, track aircraft using passive broad band emissions that may not include any identification data.

The system also allows higher positive identification at airports where foreign aircraft operate. The Mode S identification relies on the ability of the system to resolve the aircraft registration number from the Mode S data being transmitted by that aircraft. Certain countries (United States, Australia, and Germany) have known algorithms that allow the system to compute the registration number where as others use a database that may not be available or is difficult or impossible to acquire. Utilizing an image capture system in combination with a multilateration, or other passive flight tracking system, allows the system to associate the electronically received Mode S identification with the actual registration number from the aircraft.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates, in a simplified form, the airport movement areas, and, enclosed within dashed lines, the non-movement areas.

FIG. 2 is a map of planned ASDE-X installations (from www.asdex.net) as well as upgrades to the older ASDE-3 systems.

FIG. 3 sis a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of the invention as used for an aircraft arriving at an airport.

FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of the invention showing an aircraft on departure.

FIG. 5 is a drawing illustrating the different types of emissions possible from an aircraft on the ground or in the air.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating shows an embodiment of the invention as used for an aircraft arriving at an airport. As the aircraft descends and lands it is tracked and identified on the movement area at the airport. Using a combination of ETMS, radar, MLAT, ADS, acoustical or optical tracking 100 the aircraft location is known 110. At the same time, the identification of the aircraft is known through a combination of systems and procedures 200 producing a variety of ways to identify the aircraft, either by its tail number, Mode S address or call sign 210.

As the aircraft transitions from the movement area to the non-movement area, a combination of unique signals may be used for tracking, such as navigation signals (DME), cell phone data, airport video or any other electromagnetic radiation broadcast from the aircraft 120 thus providing the aircraft's ground track 130.

As the aircraft moves from the movement area into the non-movement area the ID already established is transferred with the track of the aircraft, and may be verified by optical camera recognition, or through data link information, such as ACARS or CPDLC 220, 230. Together, these data provide a complete air traffic picture with position and identification, all the way to the aircraft gate 300.

If the aircraft transitions before the overlapping tracking and identification data can be solidly established, the probable ID can be established based on last known position, probable taxi route, optical camera recognition, parking or gate location, type of aircraft, airline, time of day, or gate management system input from an integrating gate management system data.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of the invention showing an aircraft on departure. As the aircraft sits at the gate or other location, its location and position are clearly known, and tagging of the aircraft may be accomplished manually or by using data from the gate management system (GMS) 600. As the aircraft pushes back certain system on the aircraft will be operating including navigation devices, perhaps transponders, and perhaps some cell phone or other commercial communications devices 400 providing an aircraft track 410. The manually tagged aircraft identification will follow the track of the aircraft 500, 510 and may be updated by ADS information, ACARS or CPDLC. As the aircraft enters the movement area (usually after receiving ATC clearance by voice or data link.) it can be tracked by conventional surveillance 420, 430 and identified accordingly, or through other techniques such as acoustical tracking, optical tracking, or voice communications (VX) 520, 530.

FIG. 5 is an illustration showing the typical emissions from a modern aircraft as discussed in context of the present invention. Emissions can come from any system or direction. These emissions can be used in the present invention to identify an aircraft and also indicate aircraft position through multilateration and other means.

While the preferred embodiment and various alternative embodiments of the invention have been disclosed and described in detail herein, it may be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.

* * * * *

Current U.S. Class:	342/450 ; 342/456
Current International Class:	G01S 3/02 (20060101)
Field of Search:	342/450,453,454,456 701/117,120