E-Mail generated [May 12 2017]

0264-EX-CN-2017 Correspondence

ViaSat, Inc

2017-05-12ELS_191951

To: Steven Hemple E-Mail: steven.hemple@viasat.com From: Leann Nguyen Date: May 12, 2017 Subject: Request for Info - File # 0264-EX-CN-2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: Please provide the following information: - International Bureau (IB) worst-case analysis shows that this test terminal with an altitude of 40 feet (12.2 meters) would exceed the EPDF limit set in RR 22.5D (-162 dB(W/m2), 100% of the time in a 40-kHz referenced bandwidth. ViaSat needs to be aware that IB is processing several NGSO applications that will operate at low earth orbit (LEO) in the uplink 27.5-30 GHz band. In Exhibit A, last section title “RF Radiation Compliance”, it states that the maximum power from the terminal will be 0.31 W ERP; however, the Form 442 indicates a 5 W ERP. Can Viasat please confirm the ERP value being request? - Is the CW signal being swept through a frequency ranges or is the signal being transmitted in incremental steps throughout a frequency range? Please provide the frequency ranges and how the CW signal is being transmitted in this test. -Can the transmit terminal is pointed below the horizon? The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information within 30 days of May 12, 2017 may result in application dismissal pursuant to Section 5.67 and forfeiture of the filing fee pursuant to Section 1.1108. DO NOT Reply to this email by using the 'Reply' button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must upload your response via the Internet at https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/index.cfm by clicking on the "Reply to Correspondence" hyperlink. Responses to this correspondence must contain the Reference number : 36951


Document Created: 2017-05-12 11:59:11
Document Modified: 2017-05-12 11:59:11
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC