Toggle navigation
FCC.report
IBFS
ELS
FCC ID
Contact
About
FCC.report
›
ELS
›
United Water
›
0429-EX-ST-2009
United Water
0429-EX-ST-2009
Status: Grant Expired Due to New License
WE9XBL
2009-09-29
Documents and Communications:
[
refresh
]
Description
Category
Date
E-Mail generated [Sep 8, 2009]
Correspondence
2009-09-08
Incoming generated [Sep 8, 2009]
Correspondence
2009-09-08
Incoming generated [Sep 17, 2009]
Correspondence
2009-09-17
Test report
Images
2009-09-04
Confidentiality request
Images
2009-09-04
Transmitter RF Test Report
Images
2009-09-04
Antenna placement Rivervale
Images
2009-09-04
Antenna placement Hackensack
Images
2009-09-04
Antenna placement Ridgefield
Images
2009-09-04
Installation diagram for Rivervale site
Images
2009-09-04
Installation location diagram for Ridgefield
Images
2009-09-04
Installation Site for Hackensack installation
Images
2009-09-04
Confidentiality request
Text Documents
2009-09-04
Description of antenna locations
Text Documents
2009-09-04
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY
Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:
United Water
Address
Attention:
Ed Hackney
Street Address:
200 Old Hook Road
P.O. Box:
City:
Harrington Park
State:
NJ
Zip Code:
07640-1799
Country:
E-Mail Address:
[email protected]
Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:
Last Name:
Steimel
First Name:
Walter
Title:
Counsel
Phone Number:
202-452-4893
Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
Experimental application. An STA is necessary so the applicant can test the operation of its wireless water metering system in the United States, previously designed for and operated in Europe for European systems, and its compatibility with US water systems and topography while investing in a re-engineering of the RF portion of the system to a band suitable for US operation and compliant with Parts 2 and 15 of the Rules. The applicant will want to install and operate its system to ensure compatibilityof the underlying system, and to correctly adjust for RF design changes that it will need to make. It must test its system connected to selected water distribution systems in the US to ensure compatibility, and can currently only do so with the RF components it currently uses in Europe. As the RF redesign may be impacted by compatibility questions, it needs to run these tests while undertaking system design changes.
Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:
To test on remote water metering and its propagation characteristics. Run experimental tests on remote water metering to test the propagation characterists. The purpose of the operation is to install the Suez Environment VHF AMR System for a limited time period and on a limited basis in selected water distribution systems in the US in order to evaluate necessary design changes. The test will help the applicant determine special RF design and system installation and placement concerns driven by US topography, power and other factors that may differ between the locations where it currently operates systems in Europe and the US.
Information
Callsign:
WE9XBL
Class of Station:
FX
Nature of Service:
Experimental
Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date:
09/29/2009
Operation End Date:
03/28/2010
Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:
Manufacturer
Model Number
No. Of Units
Experimental
Actaris
CYBLE LRF
200
No
Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form):
Ed Hackney
Title of Applicant (if any):
Director
Date:
2009-09-03 00:00:00.0
Station Location
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Boise
Idaho
North 43 33 17
West 116 7 40
2.42
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
Modified
169.44375000-169.44375000 MHz
FX
100.000000 mW 86.200000 mW
P
12K5F2D
2400 baud, +/- 3%
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Riverdale
New Jersey
North 41 2 8
West 74 0 57
2.42
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
Modified
169.44375000-169.44375000 MHz
FX
100.000000 mW 86.200000 mW
P
12K5F2D
2400 baud, +/- 3%
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Hackensack
New Jersey
North 40 54 3
West 74 2 18
2.42
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
Modified
169.44375000-169.44375000 MHz
FX
100.000000 mW 86.200000 mW
P
12K5F2D
2400 baud, +/- 3%
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Ridgefield
New Jersey
North 40 49 24
West 73 59 55
2.42
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
Modified
169.44375000-169.44375000 MHz
FX
100.000000 mW 86.200000 mW
P
12K5F2D
2400 baud, +/- 3%
29898
© 2026 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC