The Aerospace Corporation

2192-EX-ST-2019

Status: Pending

N/A
2019-12-02

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
Test Description 4Text Documents2019-11-25
Test Description 4Text Documents2019-12-02
Test Description for 902 to 928 MHzText Documents2019-11-25
Test Description for 902 to 928 MHzText Documents2019-12-02
Test Description for 1695 to 1710 MHzText Documents2019-11-25
Test Description for 1995 to 2020 MHzText Documents2019-11-25
Test Description for 1695 to 1710 MHzText Documents2019-12-02
Test Description for 1995 to 2020 MHzText Documents2019-12-02
E-Mail generated [Dec 9 2019]Correspondence2019-12-09
Incoming generated [Dec 12 2019]Correspondence2019-12-12
Incoming generated [Jan 27 2020]Correspondence2020-01-27
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Jan 29 2020]Correspondence2020-01-29
Test Description 4Text Documents2019-12-03
Test Description for 902 to 928 MHzText Documents2019-12-03
Test Description for 1695 to 1710 MHzText Documents2019-12-03
Test Description for 1995 to 2020 MHzText Documents2019-12-03
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  The Aerospace Corporation

Address
Attention: Elaine Malmrose
Street Address: 2310 E El Segundo Blvd
P.O. Box:
City: El Segundo
State: CA
Zip Code: 90245
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Malmrose
First Name: Elaine
Title: Spectrum Staff
Phone Number: 424-405-2122

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
A STA is necessary due to a short development and test period. The test will be accomplished at a low power to do initial validation of the test system.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  The Special Temporary Authority is for an LTE emulation test both in Aerospace facility and Department of Commerce (DOC) Table Mountain Field Site & Radio Quiet Zone in Boulder, CO (https://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/resources/table-mountain/tm-home.aspx). The LTE emulation transmitter test will prepare the Aerospace Corporation to understand cellular use impact on the services that utilize the frequency band from 1695 to 1710 MHz. This test will validate Aerospaces capability to assess the impact of cellular migration into the pre-defined AWS-3 coordination zones. The test will be accomplished at low power levels. The test will be performed at the Aerospace Corporations El Segundo Campus and will greatly enhance our understanding of the system and improve the equipment for future testing. The same test will be repeated in the DOC Table Mountain facility in Boulder, CO, as a government controlled test (by NOAA). See exhibits for individual test descriptions.

Information
Callsign: WP9XSL
Class of Station: FX
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 01/13/2020
Operation End Date: 07/13/2020

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Experimental Custom 3 Yes

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Elaine Malmrose
Title of Applicant (if any): Spectrum Staff
Date: 2019-11-21 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
El Segundo California North  33  54  53 West  118  22  47 1.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 902.00000000-928.00000000 kHz FX 0.001000 W 0.001000 W P 1.22000000 % 5M00G9W LTE
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 902.00000000-928.00000000 kHz FX 0.001000 W 0.001000 W P 1.22000000 % 5M00G9W QPSK
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1695.00000000-1710.00000000 MHz FX 0.100000 W 0.100000 W P 1.22000000 % 10M0G9W LTE
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1695.00000000-1710.00000000 MHz FX 0.100000 W 0.100000 W P 1.22000000 % 10M0G9W QPSK
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1995.00000000-2020.00000000 MHz FX 0.001000 W 0.001000 W P 1.22000000 % 5M00G9W LTE
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1995.00000000-2020.00000000 MHz FX 0.001000 W 0.001000 W P 1.22000000 % 5M00G9W QPSK
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2400.00000000-2483.50000000 MHz FX 0.010000 W 0.010000 W P 1.22000000 % 5M00G9W LTE
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2400.00000000-2483.50000000 MHz FX 0.010000 W 0.010000 W P 1.22000000 % 5M00G9W QPSK

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Boulder Colorado North  40  8  19 West  105  15  17 1.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 902.00000000-928.00000000 MHz FX 0.001000 W 0.001000 W P 1.22000000 % 5M00G9W LTE
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 902.00000000-928.00000000 MHz FX 0.001000 W 0.001000 W P 1.22000000 % 5M00G9W QPSK
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1695.00000000-1710.00000000 MHz FX 0.100000 W 0.100000 W P 1.22000000 % 10M0G9W LTE
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1695.00000000-1710.00000000 MHz FX 0.100000 W 0.100000 W P 1.22000000 % 10M0G9W QPSK
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1995.00000000-2020.00000000 MHz FX 0.001000 W 0.001000 W P 1.22000000 % 5M00G9W LTE
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1995.00000000-2020.00000000 MHz FX 0.001000 W 0.001000 W P 1.22000000 % 5M00G9W QPSK
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2400.00000000-2483.50000000 MHz FX 0.010000 W 0.010000 W P 1.22000000 % 5M00G9W LTE
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2400.00000000-2483.50000000 MHz FX 0.010000 W 0.010000 W P 1.22000000 % 5M00G9W QPSK

41382

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC