Texzon Technologies, LLC

1627-EX-ST-2016

Status: Grant Expired Due to New License

WK9XOM
2016-11-18

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Nov 18 2016]Correspondence2016-11-18
STA NarrativeText Documents2016-11-15
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  Texzon Technologies, LLC

Address
Attention: Michael P. Taylor
Street Address: 202 N. I-35, Suite c
P.O. Box:
City: Red Oak
State: TX
Zip Code: 75154
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Dombrowsky
First Name: Thomas
Title: Senior Engineering Advisor, DLA Piper LLP
Phone Number: 2027994039

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
Texzon is a startup technology company focused in the fields of energy storage and distribution. The focus of the company is in the development of new technology that will allow for more efficient and effective power management and delivery in a safe, environmentally-conscious and reliable manner. The experimental authority requested herein will allow the company to demonstrate the functionality of prototype equipment and validate the science of the terrestrial electromagnetic surface wave for use in signaling. Importantly, Texzon believes such testing will be non-radiating – which will limit the interference effects to any other party in the spectrum bands under test.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  To demonstrate the science and an application of Zenneck surface waves. The system under test will be used to demonstrate the science and an application of Zenneck surface waves and is a precursor to a larger demonstration of this new signaling technology. The STA is needed to tune and test the demonstration apparatus. Once tuned, Texzon will be able to provide measurement data and better define the parameters necessary for future experimental licenses.

Information
Callsign: WK9XOM
Class of Station: FX
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 12/06/2016
Operation End Date: 12/08/2016

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Texzon Technologies, LLC N/A 1 Yes

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Michael P. Taylor
Title of Applicant (if any): Chief Administration Officer
Date: 2016-11-15 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Washington Dist of Columbia North  38  50  38 West  77  0  54 1.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 50.00000000-53.00000000 MHz FX 4.000000 kW 100.000000 mW P 0.00060000 % 100HN0N See attachment

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Washington Dist of Columbia North  38  51  53 West  77  1  1 1.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 50.00000000-53.00000000 MHz FX 4.000000 kW 100.000000 mW P 0.00060000 % 100HN0N See attachment

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Joint Base Andrews Maryland North  38  48  46 West  76  53  27 1.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 50.00000000-53.00000000 MHz FX 4.000000 kW 100.000000 mW P 0.00060000 % 100HN0N See attachment

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Alexandria Virginia North  38  48  7 West  77  3  49 1.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 50.00000000-53.00000000 MHz FX 4.000000 kW 100.000000 mW P 0.00060000 % 100HN0N See attachment

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Alexandria Virginia North  38  48  28 West  77  6  56 1.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 50.00000000-53.00000000 MHz FX 4.000000 kW 100.000000 mW P 0.00060000 % 100HN0N See attachment

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Great Falls Virginia North  39  1  42 West  77  16  44 1.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 50.00000000-53.00000000 MHz FX 4.000000 kW 100.000000 mW P 0.00060000 % 100HN0N See attachment

40066

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC