Amendment

0338-EX-ST-2000 Text Documents

Teligent, Inc.

2000-08-16ELS_40828

Carl Huie — RE: Teligent STA c cme s oncbiphey | Page 1 Ajo 1 6 M From: "McFadden, Patrick" <patrick.mcfadden@teligent.com> To: "‘Carl Huie" <CHUIE@fcc.gov> Date: 8/14/00 12:29PM Subject: RE: Teligent STA Great! | think from an engineering perspective, we will be able to do this, so we would like to proceed with the partial grant. Thanks again for the speed with which you have processed this application! Patrick

| Carl Huie — RE: Teligent STA _ C CC _ Page 1| From: Carl Huie To: "patrick.mcfadden@teligent.com". GWIA1.ROUTE_A Date: 8/14/00 12:14PM Subject: RE: Teligent STA The two freqs can be authorized without directional limitations. >>> "McFadden, Patrick" <patrick.mcfadden@teligent.com> 08/14/00 11:34AM >>> Mr. Huie — Can we use that frequency pair for both links, using one vertical polarization, and one horizontal polarization? Also, do you care which frequency we assign to which path? Thanks for your help, I want to confirm a few things, and then I think we will proceed with the partial grant.

{ Carl Huie — Re: Teligent STA Page 1 j From: Carl Huie To: "patrick.mcfadden@Teligent.com".GWIA1.ROUTE_A Date: 8/14/00 10:52AM Subject: Re: Teligent STA Preliminary check shows only two freqs that can be authorized att: 21587.5 and 22787.5 MHz. If Teligent accepts, | will grant—in—part: if Teligent rejects, | will DWOP applications and you can pursue legal challenge. How? >>> "McFadden, Patrick" <patrick.mcfadden@Teligent.com> 08/14/00 08:28AM >>> Mr. Huie — Good morning. | spoke with you on Friday concerning Teligent‘s request for a 23 GHz STA in Washington. You had informed me that the STA was not grantable as is, due to possible interference with government stations. I‘ve spoken with the engineers here and confirmed that: we would only need 56 MHz per link (emission designator 28MOD7W, as you nqted). y u[fl/ ) _ / 7 Additionally, because the paths are very short, we lower the power if that would reduce the risk of interference. Forthe Tink from W WDCMOO02, we could drop the EIRP from {;.g}o 364 dBm.~For WDCPOO$9 to WDCMO04, we could drop the EIRP from 45.4 to 3%,_ @6 2 wnt) /. 7« (P) I hope that helps. | have a quick question — if you do have to alter the frequencies we requested, would we have to recoordinate with Comsearch? Thanks very much for your time, I‘m sure you must be very busy reconstructing everything after the system failure. Please feel free to call me at your convenience. Patrick McFadden Senior Licensing Analyst (703) 762—5160 Fax (703) 762—5129

Carl Huie — Refiled STAs C 10 Page 1 From: "McFadden, Patrick" <patrick.mcfadden@teligent.com> To: "‘chuie@fec.gov‘ <chuie@fcc.gov> Date: 8/7/00 12:24PM Subject: Refiled STAs Mr. Huie — Thanks for speaking to me this morning about the resubmission of our STA applications due to the system failure. Per your instructions, I‘m sending you the old file numbers along with the corresponding new file numbers. Should you have any questions about these applications, or should you require any further information whatsoever, please do not hesitate to contact me. Old: New: 0250—ExX—ST—2000, 13EL8219 0337—EX—ST—2000, EL10142 0251—EX—ST—2000, 13EL8220 0338—EX—S7T—2000, EL10143 0252—EX—ST—2000, 13EL8221 0339—EX—S7T—2000, EL10143 Thanks again for your assistance. Patrick McFadden Senior Licensing Analyst (703) 762—5160 Fax (703) 762—5129


Document Created: 2000-08-16 10:28:04
Document Modified: 2000-08-16 10:28:04
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC