Teligent, Inc.

0337-EX-ST-2000

Status: Grant Expired Due to New License

WB9XJW
2000-08-14

Filing Notes:

DescriptionDate
combines 339-EX-ST-20002000-08-14

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
Path DataText Documents2000-08-07
AmendmentText Documents2000-08-16
Path Data IIText Documents2000-08-07
Supplemental ShowingText Documents2000-08-07
Supplemental Showing IIText Documents2000-08-07
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  Teligent, Inc.

Address
Attention: Patrick McFadden
Street Address: 8065 Leesburg Pike, Suite 400
P.O. Box:
City: Vienna
State: VA
Zip Code: 22182
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Patrick
First Name: McFadden
Title: Senior Licensing Analyst
Phone Number: 703-762-5160

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
Teligent is in the process of testing a new wireless point-to-multipoint technology from Hughes Network Systems. Because the point-to-multipoint system is part of a much larger end-to-end network (including ATM switches, TDM switches, microwave backhaul, etc.), the entire network will need to be tested to make sure that the Hughes system is working properly. This includes operation with OC3 microwave links which provide the backhaul connection between the multipoint nodes and the class 5 voice switch located in the central office. Two nodes will be used in the test plan. Each node requires a separate microwave backhaul link connection to the Teligent central office at 1120 Vermont Ave. The two temporary microwave links operating under the STA will not be carrying commercial traffic, but instead will transport test traffic used to verify the end-to-end integrity of voice and data signals carried across the network. 1. The first node (1050 Connecticut) will have a number of remote access sites that will be connected to the node via 24 GHz point-to-multipoint links using Teligent's DEMS licenses. The point-to-multipoint equipment will be from Hughes. The node will need to be connected back to the TCO at 1120 Vermont via the proposed backhaul link using 23 GHz common carrier frequencies. 2. The second node (811 Vermont Ave) will also have a number of remote access sites that will be connected to the node via 24 GHz point-to-multipoint links using Teligent's DEMS licenses. The point-to-mulipoint equipment will be from Hughes. The node will need to be connected back to the TCO at 1120 Vermont via the proposed backhaul link using 23 GHz common carrier frequencies. Two test nodes are needed to adequately test a typical Teligent network configuration and enable an evaluation of the RF performance of the point to multipoint equipment using a large number of links. The two backhaul 23 GHz links will enable connecting the test nodes back to the central office to study the end-to-end performance of this network configuration. The test will last for 3 to 6 months. Frequencies in the 23 GHz common carrier band have been selected for the backhaul links based on commercial equipment availability which will facilitate rapid deployment of the test network. Successful completion of this test will enable Teligent to deploy the Hughes point-to-multipoint equipment in many different markets across the country and significantly increase the reach and efficiency of Teligent's wireless network to competitively serve more customers using this technology. STA applications were originally filed for this purpose on July 7, 2000. The applications originally requested operations beginning August 1, 2000. Due to the system failure affecting the experimental licensing branch's website, however, these applications were lost. File numbers for the original three applications were 0250-EX-ST-2000, 0251-EX-ST-2000, 0252-EX-ST-2000.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  Test and development of point-to-multipoint technology.

Information
Callsign: WB9XJW
Class of Station: FX
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 08/14/2000
Operation End Date: 02/14/2001

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Radio Waves Inc. HP2-23 2 No
Digital Microwave Corp. Altium OC3 2 No

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Terri B. Natoli
Title of Applicant (if any): Assistant Secretar
Date: 2000-08-07 11:29:55.976

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Washington Dist of Columbia North  38  54  17 West  77  1  59
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   1.70
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:   192.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:   0.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 21587.50000000- MHz FX N/A 2.700000 W P 0.00030000 % 28M0M0D 128 QAM
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 22787.50000000- MHz FX N/A 2.700000 W P 0.00030000 % 28M0M0D 128 QAM

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Washington Dist of Columbia North  38  54  12 West  77  2  28
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   1.70
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:   192.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:   0.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 21587.50000000- MHz FX N/A 2.700000 W P 0.00030000 % 28M0M0D 128 QAM
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 22787.50000000- MHz FX N/A 2.700000 W P 0.00030000 % 28M0M0D 128 QAM

24776

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC