Raytheon Technical Services Company

0120-EX-ST-2009

Status: Denied/Dismissed

WD9XUY
2009-05-05

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

Description	Category	Date
E-Mail generated [Mar 25, 2009]	Correspondence	2009-03-25
E-Mail generated [Apr 7, 2009]	Correspondence	2009-04-07
Incoming generated [Apr 6, 2009]	Correspondence	2009-04-06

Application Form:

OET Special Temporary Authority Report

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name

Name of Applicant:

Raytheon Technical Services Company

Address

Attention:	Brian Kavalar MS:42
Street Address:	6125 E. 21st Street
P.O. Box:
City:	Indianapolis
State:	IN
Zip Code:	46219
Country:
E-Mail Address:	[email protected]

Best Contact

Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:
Last Name: Kavalar
First Name: Brian
Title: Chief Technologist
Phone Number: 317-306-7793

Explanation

Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
To complete a rapid response testing of an antenna system for a Customer. Using current technology and equipment available on Raytheon property to expedite testing.

Purpose of Operation

Please explain the purpose of operation:

We are testing a large antenna array on a external antenna test range located on the Raytheon facility grounds. The test setup consists of the receive antenna under test (a large array) and a transmitter connected to a horn antenna. The test will use a HP8753 network analyzer output, which is connected to a HP8449 power amplifier, which is in turn connected to the transmitter horn antenna on a pole which is 10 meters above ground level. The power output of the power amplifier is 18 dBm and the gain of the transmitter horn antenna is 15 dB which results in the 1.2 Watts ERP. We are planning to sweep over the frequency range listed in the STA using an unmodulated carrier signal from the signal generator (via the horn antenna) to determine characteristics of the antenna array under test over the specified frequency ranges using the display of the network analyzer.The two antennas are separated by approximately 10 meters. This will be repeated for several antennas over the course of the six month calendar window requested.

Information

Callsign:	WD9XUY
Class of Station:	FX
Nature of Service:	Experimental

Requested Period of Operation

Operation Start Date:	04/30/2009
Operation End Date:	10/30/2009

Manufacturer

Manufacturer	Model Number	No. Of Units	Experimental
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:
Hewlett Packard	HP8753	1	No
Hewlett Packard	HP8449	1	No

Certification

Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.

Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form):	Brian Kavalar
Title of Applicant (if any):	Chief Technologist
Date:	2009-03-20 00:00:00.0

Station Location

	City	State	Latitude	Longitude	Mobile	Radius of Operation
	Indianapolis	Indiana	North 39 47 40	West 86 2 6		1.00

Datum: NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used? Yes
Exhibit submitted: No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point: 30.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane: 10.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building? Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters: 10.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters: 260.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers: 15.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: Raytheon building structure is situation on a line of sight between the transmitter and the Indianapolis International Airport thus the building is providing shielding to operation of aircraft.

Action	Frequency	Station Class	Output Power/ERP	Mean Peak	Frequency Tolerance (+/-)	Emission Designator	Modulating Signal
New	1712.00000000-1718.00000000 MHz	FX	50.000000 mW 2.000000 W	P		5K00N0N	None

15670