Raytheon Missile Systems

1017-EX-ST-2018

Status: Granted

WM9XWU
2018-06-14

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Jun 14 2018]Correspondence2018-06-14
Explanation of Experiment and Need for STAText Documents2018-06-04
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Jun 14 2018]Correspondence2018-06-14
Explanation of Experiment and Need for STAText Documents2018-06-04
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  Raytheon Missile Systems

Address
Attention: Bartholomew Turner
Street Address: 1151 E Hermans Road, Building M02
P.O. Box:
City: Tucson
State: AZ
Zip Code: 85756
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Cortez
First Name: Anne
Title: Counsel
Phone Number: 5

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
An STA is appropriate since the proposed experimentation is scheduled to last only 6 months.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  Testing of radar to see if it effectively integrates with optics system.

Information
Callsign: WM9XWU
Class of Station: FX
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 07/09/2018
Operation End Date: 01/05/2019

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Weibel Scientific RR2100I 1 No

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Bartholomew D. Turner
Title of Applicant (if any): Spectrum Manager
Date: 2018-06-04 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Yuma Arizona North  31  58  41 West  114  22  3
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   Yes
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:   10.10
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:   77.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:   16.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: site passed Towair analysis
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 10.17600000- GHz FX 80.000000 W 194.200000 kW P 1K00N0N
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 10.17600000- GHz FX 80.000000 W 194.200000 kW P 300MF3N
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 10.17600000- GHz FX 80.000000 W 194.200000 kW P 4M00N0N

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Yuma Arizona North  32  57  32 West  114  21  14
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   Yes
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:   10.10
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:   200.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:   16.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: site passed TOWAIR analysis
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 10.17600000- GHz FX 80.000000 W 194.200000 kW P 1K00N0N
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 10.17600000- GHz FX 80.000000 W 194.200000 kW P 300MF3N
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 10.17600000- GHz FX 80.000000 W 194.200000 kW P 4M00N0N

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Truth or Consequence New Mexico North  32  59  46 West  106  58  32
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   Yes
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:   10.10
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:   1170.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:   16.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: site passed TOWAIR analysis
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 10.17600000- GHz FX 80.000000 W 194.200000 kW P 1K00N0N
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 10.17600000- GHz FX 80.000000 W 194.200000 kW P 300MF3N
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 10.17600000- GHz FX 80.000000 W 194.200000 kW P 4M00N0N

32757

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC