New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC

0376-EX-ST-2014

Status: Grant Expired Due to New License

WH9XNP
2014-05-13

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

Description	Category	Date
Grant E-mail Notification generated [May 14 2014]	Correspondence	2014-05-14
Narrative Statement	Text Documents	2014-04-29

Application Form:

OET Special Temporary Authority Report

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name

Name of Applicant:

New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC

Address

Attention:	Reginald Youngblood
Street Address:	3300 E. Renner Road, B3132
P.O. Box:
City:	Richardson
State:	TX
Zip Code:	75082
Country:
E-Mail Address:	[email protected]

Best Contact

Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:
Last Name: Roughton
First Name: William
Title: Assistant Secretary of Manager
Phone Number: 202-457-2040

Explanation

Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
On July 18, 2013, AT&T filed a request for a limited waiver of Section 22.913 of the Commission’s rules. Section 22.913 requires the use of an Effective Radiated Power (“ERP”) measure for determining cellular base station power transmission limits. AT&T had proposed that the current rule be restated to include a power spectral density (“PSD”) measure as an alternative to the ERP measure. Specifically, AT&T sought a waiver for markets in South Florida (see WT Docket No. 13-202). Because some Public Safety agencies expressed concern with AT&T’s proposal, AT&T agreed to do testing. To conduct this testing AT&T needs a STA for no more than six months.

Purpose of Operation

Please explain the purpose of operation:

The purpose of this STA is to test the impact of using a Power Spectral Density (“PSD”) measure as an alternative to an Effective Radiated Power (“ERP”) measure for determining cellular base station power transmission limits. This testing is intended to assure that public safety systems operating in adjacent bands will not experience an increased risk of interference should the Commission revise its cellular base station power limits to include a PSD measure as an alternative to the existing ERP measure.

Information

Callsign:	WH9XNP
Class of Station:	FX
Nature of Service:	Experimental

Requested Period of Operation

Operation Start Date:	05/09/2014
Operation End Date:	11/09/2014

Manufacturer

Manufacturer	Model Number	No. Of Units	Experimental
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:
Ericsson	RBS3206	1	No
Ericsson	KRC11822/5 RU22	2	No

Certification

Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.

Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form):	William Roughton
Title of Applicant (if any):	Assistant Secretary of Manager
Date:	2014-04-29 00:00:00.0

Station Location

	City	State	Latitude	Longitude	Mobile	Radius of Operation
	Miami	Florida	North 25 43 56	West 80 20 59	Five mile radius	8.00

Datum: NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used? No
Exhibit submitted: No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building? No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:

Action	Frequency	Station Class	Output Power/ERP	Mean Peak	Frequency Tolerance (+/-)	Emission Designator	Modulating Signal
New	869.00000000-894.00000000 MHz	FX	60.000000 W 250.000000 W	P		5M00DXW	QPSK

Action	Frequency	Station Class	Output Power/ERP	Mean Peak	Frequency Tolerance (+/-)	Emission Designator	Modulating Signal
New	869.00000000-894.00000000 MHz	FX	60.000000 W 250.000000 W	P		5M00DXW	16QAM

Action	Frequency	Station Class	Output Power/ERP	Mean Peak	Frequency Tolerance (+/-)	Emission Designator	Modulating Signal
New	869.00000000-894.00000000 MHz	FX	60.000000 W 250.000000 W	P		5M00DXW	64QAM

18161