National Public Radio

0501-EX-ST-2013

Status: Grant Expired Due to New License

WG9XRD
2013-06-27

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Jun 28 2013]Correspondence2013-06-28
Filing Fee ExemptionText Documents2013-06-07
Field Test Plan DocumentText Documents2013-06-07
Test Plan for MeasurementsText Documents2013-05-23
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  National Public Radio

Address
Attention: John Kean, NPR Labs
Street Address: 1111 North Capital Street NE
P.O. Box:
City: Washington
State: DC
Zip Code: 20002
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Kean
First Name: John
Title: Senior Technologist
Phone Number: 202-513-2476

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
he proposed testing will provide direct evaluation of the interference susceptibility of a particular set of C-Band receive-only earth terminals used by NPR. As discussed in Item 5, the testing would require the emission of low-power RF test signals in the vicinity of the receive terminal, which may require a STA.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  Susceptibility Testing The test transmissions are requested to empirically determine the interference susceptibility of NPRs standard C-Band receive earth terminals with signals that are in-band or on frequencies immediately adjacent to the frequency band used for downlink. Direct measurement is needed to more accurately determine this performance, which is usally based on tests or estimates of individual components in the system (antenna directivity, LNB amplifier and filter performance, etc.), which together may differ from actual system performance.

Information
Callsign: WG9XRD
Class of Station: MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 06/01/2013
Operation End Date: 06/30/2013

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Agilent (RF generator) E4433B 1 Yes
Mini-Circuits (amplifier) ZHL-1042J 1 Yes
Seavey (horn antenna) SGA-40 1 Yes

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Gregory A. Lewis
Title of Applicant (if any): Deputy General Counsel
Date: 2013-05-23 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
New Orleans Louisiana North      West      50 meter radius of earth station under test 0.05
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   Yes
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   23.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:   2.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:   5.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:   4.50
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: Satellite earth station under test is on campus of University of New Orleans and is surrounded by buidlings taller than proposed test antenna.
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 3550.00000000-3950.00000000 MHz MO 26.000000 mW 1000.000000 mW M 0.00100000 % 10M0G1D 1

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Harrisonburg Virginia North      West      50 m radius of earth station under test 0.05
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   Yes
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   23.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:   2.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:   427.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:   9.20
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: The test area is located in a commercial area of downtown Harrisonburg and is entirely surrounded by taller buildings and trees.
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 3550.00000000-3950.00000000 MHz MO 26.000000 mW 1000.000000 mW M 0.00100000 % 10M0G1D 1

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Tacoma Washington North      West      50 m radius of earth station under test 0.05
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   Yes
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   23.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:   2.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:   97.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:   2.60
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: The test area is located on the campus of Pacific Lutheran University and is entirely surrounded by taller buildings and trees.
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 3550.00000000-3950.00000000 MHz MO 26.000000 mW 1000.000000 mW M 0.00100000 % 10M0G1D 1

25611

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC