Toggle navigation
FCC.report
IBFS
ELS
FCC ID
Contact
About
FCC.report
›
ELS
›
Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC
›
0150-EX-ST-2002
Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC
0150-EX-ST-2002
Status: Grant Expired Due to New License
WB9XQG
2002-05-15
Documents and Communications:
[
refresh
]
Description
Category
Date
E-Mail generated [Apr 11, 2002]
Correspondence
2002-04-11
E-Mail generated [Apr 18, 2002]
Correspondence
2002-04-18
Incoming generated [May 07, 2002]
Correspondence
2002-05-08
Incoming generated [May 07, 2002]
Correspondence
2002-05-08
Incoming generated [May 07, 2002]
Correspondence
2002-05-08
Exhibit A
Text Documents
2002-03-28
Exhibit B
Text Documents
2002-03-28
Exhibit C
Text Documents
2002-03-28
STA Request
Text Documents
2002-05-08
Exhibit B Necessary Bandwidth
Text Documents
2002-04-17
Exhibit A In Response To Item 8
Text Documents
2002-04-17
Exhibit C Supplemental Antenna Data
Text Documents
2002-04-17
Amended Exhibit A In Response To Item 8
Text Documents
2002-05-07
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY
Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:
Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC
Address
Attention:
Lon C. Levin
Street Address:
10802 Parkridge Boulevard
P.O. Box:
City:
Reston
State:
VA
Zip Code:
20191
Country:
E-Mail Address:
[email protected]
Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:
Last Name:
Konczal
First Name:
David
Title:
Mr.
Phone Number:
(202) 454-7032
Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC ('MSV') holds a license to operate a U.S. mobile satellite service (MSS) system in the L-band. MSV requests temporary authority to test and demonstrate new types of MTs that will operate with its licensed satellite, MSAT-2. While MSV currently holds blanket MT licenses, the technical parameters of the MTs to be tested and demonstrated pursuant to this STA are sufficiently different from those of MSVs current MT licenses as to require approval from the Commission. Specifically, these MTs will operate with a wider bandwidth (up to 400 kHz) than MSVs currently licensed MTs.
Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:
Test and demonstration of new types of mobile terminals that have not yet been authorized.
Information
Callsign:
WB9XQG
Class of Station:
MO
Nature of Service:
Experimental
Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date:
05/15/2002
Operation End Date:
11/15/2002
Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:
Manufacturer
Model Number
No. Of Units
Experimental
See Exhibit A
See Exhibit A
1
Yes
Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form):
Lon C. Levin
Title of Applicant (if any):
Vice President and Regulatory Counsel
Date:
2002-03-28 17:35:47.363
Station Location
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Los Angeles
California
North 33 49 43
West 118 9 9
Los Angeles, CA area
804.00
Datum:
NAD 27
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
80.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
151.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
47.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
1626.50000000-1660.50000000 MHz
MO
25.000000 W 60.000000 W
M
600HG1D
600-baud
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
1626.50000000-1660.50000000 MHz
MO
60.000000 W 1160.000000 W
M
193KG1D
161K-baud
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
1626.50000000-1660.50000000 MHz
MO
25.000000 W 60.000000 W
M
5K25G1D
5250-baud
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Seattle
Washington
North 47 30 15
West 122 17 30
Seattle, WA area
804.00
Datum:
NAD 27
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
80.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
152.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
32.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
1626.50000000-1660.50000000 MHz
MO
25.000000 W 60.000000 W
M
600HG1D
600-baud
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
1626.50000000-1660.50000000 MHz
MO
25.000000 W 60.000000 W
M
5K25G1D
5250-baud
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
1626.50000000-1660.50000000 MHz
MO
60.000000 W 1160.000000 W
M
193KG1D
161K-baud
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Washington
Dist of Columbia
North 39 7 3
West 78 48 36
Washington, DC area
325.00
Datum:
NAD 27
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
45.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
213.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
39.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
1626.50000000-1646.50000000 MHz
MO
16.000000 W 1220.000000 W
M
386KG1D
322K-baud
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
1626.50000000-1646.50000000 MHz
MO
3.000000 W 15.000000 W
M
12K1G1D
10.1K-baud
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
North
West
US territorial waters in the Gulf of Mexico (within 12-mi limit off the coasts of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida)
Datum:
NAD 27
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
11.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
213.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
39.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
1626.50000000-1646.50000000 MHz
MO
16.000000 W 1220.000000 W
M
386KG1D
322K-baud
37409
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC