Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC

0150-EX-ST-2002

Status: Grant Expired Due to New License

WB9XQG
2002-05-15

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
E-Mail generated [Apr 11, 2002]Correspondence2002-04-11
E-Mail generated [Apr 18, 2002]Correspondence2002-04-18
Incoming generated [May 07, 2002]Correspondence2002-05-08
Incoming generated [May 07, 2002]Correspondence2002-05-08
Incoming generated [May 07, 2002]Correspondence2002-05-08
Exhibit AText Documents2002-03-28
Exhibit BText Documents2002-03-28
Exhibit CText Documents2002-03-28
STA RequestText Documents2002-05-08
Exhibit B Necessary BandwidthText Documents2002-04-17
Exhibit A In Response To Item 8Text Documents2002-04-17
Exhibit C Supplemental Antenna DataText Documents2002-04-17
Amended Exhibit A In Response To Item 8Text Documents2002-05-07
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC

Address
Attention: Lon C. Levin
Street Address: 10802 Parkridge Boulevard
P.O. Box:
City: Reston
State: VA
Zip Code: 20191
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Konczal
First Name: David
Title: Mr.
Phone Number: (202) 454-7032

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC ('MSV') holds a license to operate a U.S. mobile satellite service (“MSS”) system in the L-band. MSV requests temporary authority to test and demonstrate new types of MTs that will operate with its licensed satellite, MSAT-2. While MSV currently holds blanket MT licenses, the technical parameters of the MTs to be tested and demonstrated pursuant to this STA are sufficiently different from those of MSV’s current MT licenses as to require approval from the Commission. Specifically, these MTs will operate with a wider bandwidth (up to 400 kHz) than MSV’s currently licensed MTs.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  Test and demonstration of new types of mobile terminals that have not yet been authorized.

Information
Callsign: WB9XQG
Class of Station: MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 05/15/2002
Operation End Date: 11/15/2002

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
See Exhibit A See Exhibit A 1 Yes

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Lon C. Levin
Title of Applicant (if any): Vice President and Regulatory Counsel
Date: 2002-03-28 17:35:47.363

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Los Angeles California North  33  49  43 West  118  9  9 Los Angeles, CA area 804.00
Datum:  NAD 27
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   80.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:   151.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:   47.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1626.50000000-1660.50000000 MHz MO 25.000000 W 60.000000 W M 600HG1D 600-baud
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1626.50000000-1660.50000000 MHz MO 60.000000 W 1160.000000 W M 193KG1D 161K-baud
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1626.50000000-1660.50000000 MHz MO 25.000000 W 60.000000 W M 5K25G1D 5250-baud

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Seattle Washington North  47  30  15 West  122  17  30 Seattle, WA area 804.00
Datum:  NAD 27
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   80.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:   152.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:   32.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1626.50000000-1660.50000000 MHz MO 25.000000 W 60.000000 W M 600HG1D 600-baud
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1626.50000000-1660.50000000 MHz MO 25.000000 W 60.000000 W M 5K25G1D 5250-baud
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1626.50000000-1660.50000000 MHz MO 60.000000 W 1160.000000 W M 193KG1D 161K-baud

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Washington Dist of Columbia North  39  7  3 West  78  48  36 Washington, DC area 325.00
Datum:  NAD 27
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   45.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:   213.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:   39.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1626.50000000-1646.50000000 MHz MO 16.000000 W 1220.000000 W M 386KG1D 322K-baud
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1626.50000000-1646.50000000 MHz MO 3.000000 W 15.000000 W M 12K1G1D 10.1K-baud

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
North      West      US territorial waters in the Gulf of Mexico (within 12-mi limit off the coasts of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida)
Datum:  NAD 27
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   11.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:   213.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:   39.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1626.50000000-1646.50000000 MHz MO 16.000000 W 1220.000000 W M 386KG1D 322K-baud

37409

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC