Honeywell International Inc.

0612-EX-ST-2004

Status: Grant Expired Due to New License

WB9XYQ
2004-10-29

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
E-Mail generated [Oct 22, 2004]Correspondence2004-10-22
Incoming generated [Oct 25, 2004]Correspondence2004-10-25
Incoming generated [Oct 22, 2004]Correspondence2004-10-22
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  Honeywell International Inc.

Address
Attention: David J. Gilbert
Street Address: 8323 Lindbergh Court
P.O. Box:
City: Sarasota
State: FL
Zip Code: 34243
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Gilbert
First Name: David
Title: Business Lead Cabin Services
Phone Number: (941) 360-6208

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
Honeywell participates in the RTCA Special Committee 202, chartered to report on the intereference of passenger devices (PEDs) with aircraft systems. Honeywell is evaluating the feasibility of the use of PCS and cellular devices while in flight and the potential effects of transmissions with Airborne systems and ground network infrastructure. Having carried out limited trials in August 2004 on the ground and in flight over ocean regions without recording any potential intererence to existing cellular network operators, we are planning to carry out customer test marketing to determine functional requirements and limitations of any potential system. The test program is planned to take place between November 1, 2004 and April 30, 2005.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  Evaluating PCS devices and a pico-cell in up to 10 general aviation test aircraft on the ground or in flight within Arizona, Florida and Minnesota with limited and infrequent use at low power levels. Honeywell will coordinate operation with existing cellular operators to ensure non-interference with revenue generating services. The scheduled test program will measure emmissions from the PCS devices and PCS handsets and will also measure any discernible emmissions outside the aircraft on the ground. The PCS devices will be under pico-cell control while operating in the aircraft, the pico-cell being installed in the test aircraft.

Information
Callsign: WB9XYQ
Class of Station: FX MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 11/01/2004
Operation End Date: 04/30/2005

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
IPAccess BTS_GSM1900 2 No
TBD GSM1900 Handset 10 No

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): David Gilbert
Title of Applicant (if any): Business Lead Cabin Services
Date: 2004-10-21 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
North      West     
Datum: 
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?  
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1850.00000000-1910.00000000 MHz FX 0.500000 mW 10.000000 mW 200KGXX
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1930.00000000-1990.00000000 MHz FX 19.000000 mW 10.000000 mW 200KGXX

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
North      West      In flight over 10,000 ft within AZ, FL and MN.
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1850.00000000-1910.00000000 MHz MO 0.500000 mW 20.000000 mW 200KGXX
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 1930.00000000-1990.00000000 MHz MO 19.000000 mW 20.000000 mW 200KGXX

22852

© 2022 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC