Outgoing and reply

0145-EX-PL-2002 Correspondence

Georgia Institute of Technology

2002-07-11ELS_57109

From: <oetech@fccsun34w.fcc.gov> To: <gtannahi@fcc.gov> Date: 7/8/02 4:45PM Subject: Unable to Send Mail Record From thomas.pratt@gtri.gatech.edu Mon Jul 8 15:52:22 2002 Return-Path: <thomas.pratt@gtri.gatech.edu> Received: from gatekeeper2.fcc.gov by fccsun34w.fcc.gov (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id PAA16636; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:52:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov; id PAA05169; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:54:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200207081954.PAA05169@gatekeeper2.fcc.gov> Received: from comserver.gtri.gatech.edu(130.207.202.200) by gatekeeper2.fcc.gov via csmap (V6.0) id srcAAAU6aagk; Mon, 8 Jul 02 15:54:15 -0400 Received: from tgpcndpc (tgpcndpc.gtri.gatech.edu [130.207.202.90]) by comserver.gtri.gatech.edu with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id NZ7FN312; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:53:58 -0400 X-Sender: tp17@casbah.gatech.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 16:01:51 -0700 To: oetech@fccsun34w.fcc.gov From: "Thomas G. Pratt" <thomas.pratt@gtri.gatech.edu> Subject: Re: null [Reference Number: 2113] Cc: Pamela.Rary@legal.gatech.edu, Maryann.ingram@ece.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: <200207051754.NAA23997@fccsun34w.fcc.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Length: 1867 The 0145 and 0146 filings regard the same project, but utilize different antennas and corresponding transmit powers. I believe the two applications should be consolidated into a single appication. Please note that on application 0146, the response to question 4 should be "no". This is not a federally funded project, but rather is a state government funded project. Also since Mary Ann's applications deals mainly with CW signals, whereas mine relates to OFDM, it may not be appropriate to combine the applications. Please let me know if you need additional information. one. At 01:54 PM 7/5/02 -0400, you wrote: >We have two similar filings. It appears that file number 0145-EX-PL-2002 is not as detailed as 0146. Should we delete the first filing 0145? Also, does this experiment relate to filings for Professor Mary Ann Ingram. If they are for the same overall project then it may be beneficial to consolidate all testing into a single license for Georgia Tech. > >Confirmation Number: EL12397 >aserafin@fcc.gov >========================================== >The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information within 30 days of 07/05/2002 may result in application dismissal pursuant to Section 5.67 and forfeiture of the filing fee

pursuant to Section 1.1108. > >DO NOT Reply to this email by using the 'Reply' button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must upload your response via the Internet at https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/index_els.html > ________________________________________________ Thomas G. Pratt, PhD Senior Research Engineer Information Technology & Telecommunications Laboratory Georgia Tech Research Institute Phone: (404) 894-7220 Fax: (404) 894-3906 email: thomas.pratt@gtri.gatech.edu


Document Created: 2002-07-11 09:42:38
Document Modified: 2002-07-11 09:42:38
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC