E-Mail generated [Feb 13 2012]

0072-EX-PL-2012 Correspondence

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems

2012-02-14ELS_123130

To: Naiel Askar E-Mail: naiel.askar@ga.com From: Doug Young Date: February 13, 2012 Subject: Request for Info - File #0072-EX-PL-2012 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: I have some questions in regards to the coordinates for some of your locations. For instance, the location at Oceanside Shore appears to be in the ocean. Is this what is intended? This could be allowed, but if I coordinate this with NTIA and say it is in California, they will question me on it. Also, some of the other locations are not so near to the cities that are listed. This may or may not be a problem. This is the definition for the field that NTIA uses: "This field is for the name of the city or other geographical subdivision in which the site of the transmitting antenna is physically located. A major installation, such as Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport or Andrews AFB, is considered to be a city or other geographical subdivision. In certain cases non-geographical data are used." The items indicated above must be submitted before processing can continue on the above referenced application. Failure to provide the requested information within 30 days of February 13, 2012 may result in application dismissal pursuant to Section 5.67 and forfeiture of the filing fee pursuant to Section 1.1108. DO NOT Reply to this email by using the 'Reply' button. In order for your response to be processed expeditiously, you must upload your response via the Internet at https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/index.cfm by clicking on the "Reply to Correspondence" hyperlink. Responses to this correspondence must contain the Reference number : 16185


Document Created: 2012-02-14 07:35:54
Document Modified: 2012-02-14 07:35:54
© 2026 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC