EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation

0344-EX-ST-2006

Status: Grant Expired Due to New License

WC9XDY
2007-03-07

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
Emergency Contact AttachmentText Documents2006-05-16
Directional Antenna AttachmentText Documents2006-05-16
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation

Address
Attention: David K. Moskowitz, Executive Vice President and G
Street Address: 9601 S. Meridian Blvd.
P.O. Box:
City: Englewood
State: CO
Zip Code: 80112
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Barnes
First Name: David
Title: Program Manager
Phone Number: 404-978-8209

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
EchoStar requests authority to continue testing WiMax equipment that was authorized in File Number 0700-EX-ST-2005 (Call Sign WC9XDY) for an additional six months. EchoStar is requesting authority to conduct tests in frequencies allocated to the government because the new AirSpan equipment EchoStar is seeking to test is made by a foreign manufacturer and operates in frequencies that are allocated to WiMax operations in other parts of the world. For the purpose of testing the AirSpan product, it was not feasible to have the manufacturer change the operating frequencies to U.S. commercial WiMax frequencies. EchoStar proposes to use the same 3.5 MHz frequency pair authorized for Call Sign WC9XDY to test the AirSpan WiMax equipment. If the test is successful and EchoStar decides to order the equipment, the order will be contingent on the equipment being modified to work in an appropriate band for commercial WiMax service in the United States.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  Testing wireless system. The purpose of the operation is to test the functionality of the wireless system. EchoStar would install the base unit at its Atlanta facility and would install no more than ten remote systems at various locations within ten miles of its Atlanta facility.

Information
Callsign: WC9XDY
Class of Station: FX MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 06/09/2006
Operation End Date: 12/09/2006

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Airspan As.Max MacroMax 1 No
Airspan AS.MAX EasyST 5 No
Airspan AS.MAX ProST 5 No

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): David K. Moskowitz
Title of Applicant (if any): Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Date: 2006-05-16 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Atlanta Georgia North  33  55  34 West  84  20  48
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   Yes
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 3530.00000000-3533.50000000 MHz FX 2.000000 W 45.000000 W P 0.00080000 % 3M50D7D 64QAM, 16QAM, QPSK, BPSK

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
North  33  55  34 West  84  20  48 Within 10 miles of base unit 16.10
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   Yes
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 3430.00000000-3433.50000000 MHz MO 250.000000 mW 10.000000 W P 0.00080000 % 3M50D7D 64QAM, 16QAM, QPSK, BPSK

20962

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC