Exhibit 3 Coordination with FAA

0231-EX-CM-2017 Text Documents

Chemring Sensors and Electronic Systems, Inc

2017-09-27ELS_198990

                                           EXHIBIT 3



      COORDINATION WITH FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA)

              CHEMRING SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC.

        APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION OF EXPERIMENTAL LICENSE
                         CALL SIGN WG2XMT

                                 FILE NO. 0231-EX-CM-2017



Chemring Sensors and Electronic Systems (“Chemring” or “CSES”) seeks a modification to its
existing experimental license (Call Sign WG2XMT, File No. 0327-EX-PL-2013, granted Nov.
26, 2013) to change its testing locations. In particular, Chemring seeks to remove the two testing
locations in Charlottesville, Virginia, and replace them with one testing location in Charlotte,
North Carolina. (The other testing location in Dulles, Virginia, remains the same.)

Chemring previously filed an application for modification that was dismissed without prejudice
due to Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) concerns regarding potential interference (Call
Sign WG2XMT, File No. 0034-EX-CM-2017, dismissed without prejudice July 24, 2017).

Chemring has coordinated with the FAA regarding its concerns and the FAA has conditionally
concurred with Chemring’s application via correspondence dated Sept. 7, 2017. Please see the
attached.

In addition, please note that the statement requested by Mr. Murphy (“Due to emission levels
exceeding the required limits per FCC Part 15 and NTIA Annex K in the 960-2210 MHz range,
the proponent will operate with lower power and/or shielding to reduce risk to nearby FAA
operations.”) has been added to Exhibit 1, Testing Location Descriptions, and Exhibit 2,
Government Project Description and Public Interest Statement.


                                                                                       EXHIBIT 3




From: rodney.murphy@faa.gov [mailto:rodney.murphy@faa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 11:56 AM
To: Browne, Maria
Cc: michael.richmond@faa.gov; timothy.j.pawlowitz@faa.gov; John.Kennedy@fcc.gov
Subject: RE: OET Experimental License Dismissal Notification, Call Sign: WG2XMT File Number: 0034-EX-CM-2017

After considerable review (including the Army certification submissions), the FAA will conditionally concurs with 0034‐
EX‐CM‐2017.
         Please add the following statement:
                  Due to emission levels exceeding the required limits per FCC Part 15 and NTIA Annex K in the 960‐2210
MHz range, the proponent will operate with lower power and/or shielding to reduce risk to nearby FAA operations. This
is especially important for Dulles since the location is within the required distance separation.

Rodney Murphy
Federal Aviation Administration
Spectrum Engineering and Policy
Fixed/Land Mobile,UAS, Satellite, Experimentals
FAA FAS Representative
202‐267‐9501

From: Browne, Maria [mailto:MariaBrowne@dwt.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 10:40 AM
To: Murphy, Rodney (FAA) <rodney.murphy@faa.gov>
Subject: RE: OET Experimental License Dismissal Notification, Call Sign: WG2XMT File Number: 0034‐EX‐CM‐2017

Mr. Murphy,

Following up to be sure that you received the email below and to see if there is any additional information we can
provide.

Kind regards,

Maria

Maria Browne | Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
1919 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 800 | Washington, DC 20006
Tel: (202) 973-4281 | Fax: (202) 973-4481
Email: mariabrowne@dwt.com | Website: www.dwt.com

Anchorage | Bellevue | Los Angeles | New York | Portland | San Francisco | Seattle | Shanghai | Washington, D.C.


From: Browne, Maria
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 5:55 PM
To: 'rodney.murphy@faa.gov'
Subject: RE: OET Experimental License Dismissal Notification, Call Sign: WG2XMT File Number: 0034-EX-CM-2017
                                                                                                1


                                                                                       EXHIBIT 3

Mr. Murphy,

Please see attached in response to your questions below. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any additional
questions.

Kind regards,

Maria

Maria Browne | Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
1919 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 800 | Washington, DC 20006
Tel: (202) 973-4281 | Fax: (202) 973-4481
Email: mariabrowne@dwt.com | Website: www.dwt.com

Anchorage | Bellevue | Los Angeles | New York | Portland | San Francisco | Seattle | Shanghai | Washington, D.C.


From: rodney.murphy@faa.gov [mailto:rodney.murphy@faa.gov]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 2:44 PM
To: Browne, Maria
Subject: RE: OET Experimental License Dismissal Notification, Call Sign: WG2XMT File Number: 0034-EX-CM-2017

Since 2012, the FAA has consistently provided objections to Husky GPR operations at both Dulles, VA, Charlottesville,
VA and Charlotte, NC. This was done under NIITEK ownership. Various comments were given, such ensuring that the
emissions will be under FCC Part 15 rules for UWB, to notching out critical FAA aviation bands (108‐137 MHz, 328.6‐
335.5 MHz, etc).

Can the proponent provide information about the emissions masking and any possible shielding to ensure that the
power levels are not excess and harmful? In other words, how much power will actually be emitted, and can previous
conditions (such as frequency notching) be utilized as necessary?

Rodney Murphy
Federal Aviation Administration
Spectrum Engineering and Policy
Fixed/Land Mobile,UAS, Satellite, Experimentals
FAA FAS Representative
202‐267‐9501

From: Browne, Maria [mailto:MariaBrowne@dwt.com]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 1:57 PM
To: Murphy, Rodney (FAA)
Subject: FW: OET Experimental License Dismissal Notification, Call Sign: WG2XMT File Number: 0034-EX-CM-2017




Maria Browne | Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
1919 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 800 | Washington, DC 20006
Tel: (202) 973-4281 | Fax: (202) 973-4481
Email: mariabrowne@dwt.com | Website: www.dwt.com

Anchorage | Bellevue | Los Angeles | New York | Portland | San Francisco | Seattle | Shanghai | Washington, D.C.


From: oetech@fccsun27w.fcc.gov [mailto:oetech@fccsun27w.fcc.gov]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 4:39 PM
To: Browne, Maria
Subject: OET Experimental License Dismissal Notification, Call Sign: WG2XMT File Number: 0034-EX-CM-2017

                                                                                                2


                                                  EXHIBIT 3

                           FCC Home | Search | RSS | Updates | E-Filing | Initiatives | Consumers | Find People

Office of Engineering and Technology
The
link ed
image
canno…




                               Maria Browne, Chemring Sensors and Electronic Systems, Inc
To:
                               mariabrowne@dwt.com

                               OET Systems Administration (Batch Processing) OET Systems Administration
                               (Batch Processing)
From:
                               Bill.Schwartz@fcc.gov




                               Chemring Sensors and Electronic Systems, Inc
Applicant:
                               0034-EX-CM-2017
File Number:

                               38082
Correspondence Reference
Number:
                               07/24/2017
Date of Original Email:

This refers to application, File No 0034-EX-CM-2017, for an experimental authorization. Hereby, you are
notified that the referenced application has been dismissed without prejudice.


DO NOT Reply to this email by using the reply button.




                                                        3


                                          EXHIBIT 3




August 22, 2017



Rodney Murphy
Federal Aviation Administration
Spectrum Engineering and Policy
Fixed/Land Mobile, UAS, Satellite, Experimentals
FAA FAS Representative

Re:    CSES Time Domain Impulse Radar



Mr. Murphy:

       Pursuant to your request, attached please find information provided by Chemring Sensors
responding to your questions concerning the CSES (formerly NIITEK) Time Domain Impulse
Radar (“GPR”). Specifically, the attached includes an explanation of the technology employed
by the GPR, as well as a description of the GPR’s emissions and power levels, the methods
employed by Chemring to minimize the GPR’s interference potential, the extensive testing
conducted by Chemring in conjunction with its military partners, and its numerous years of
experience operating the GPR without any instances of interference, including operation in close
proximity to airports.

      Please let know if we can provide any additional information to assist in your analysis of
the GPR.



       Sincerely,




       Maria Browne


                                   EXHIBIT 3




Enclosure:
       Letter to FCC re CSES GPR


EXHIBIT 3


EXHIBIT 3


EXHIBIT 3



Document Created: 2017-09-27 10:21:36
Document Modified: 2017-09-27 10:21:36

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC