Corvus BC 3 ODAR Version 1point3

0021-EX-CM-2016 Text Documents

Astro Digital, Incorporated

2017-09-21ELS_198748

                          Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3




   Astro Digital Corvus-BC3 Orbital Debris Assessment
                      Report (ODAR)

                         CORVUSBC3-ODAR-1.3




This report is presented as compliance with NASA-STD-8719.14, APPENDIX A.
Report Version: 1.3, 9/21/2017




Astro Digital US, Inc.

NASA Ames Research Park
Building 503
M/S-19-46L, P.O. Box 1
Moffett Field, CA 94034-0001



Document Data is Not Restricted. This document contains no proprietary, ITAR, or
export controlled information.

DAS Software Version Used In Analysis: v2.0.2



                                       1


                                                  Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3




                                                            Revision Record
  Revision:                   Date:                      Affected Pages:                            Changes:                         Author(s):
    1.0                   9/7/2015                       All –Initial                      DAS Software Results                   B. Cooper
                                                                                           Orbit Lifetime
                                                                                           Analysis
        1.1               11/12/2015                                                       Minor formatting                       B. Cooper
        1.3               9/21/2017                                                        Updated orbit for                      B. Cooper
                                                                                           launch on PSLV




                                                             Table of Contents

Self-assessment and OSMA assessment of the ODAR using the format in Appendix
A.2 of NASA-STD-8719.14: ............................................................................................................. 3
Comments .............................................................................................................................................. 4
Assessment Report Format: ........................................................................................................... 5
Corvus-BC Description: ................................................................................................................. 5
ODAR Section 1: Program Management and Mission Overview ....................................... 5
ODAR Section 2: Spacecraft Description ...................................................................................... 6
ODAR Section 3: Assessment of Spacecraft Debris Released during Normal
Operations ................................................................................................................................................. 7
ODAR Section 4: Assessment of Spacecraft Intentional Breakups and Potential for
Explosions. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7
ODAR Section 5: Assessment of Spacecraft Potential for On-Orbit Collisions ............ 10
ODAR Section 6: Assessment of Spacecraft Post-mission Disposal Plans and
Procedures ............................................................................................................................................... 11
ODAR Section 7: Assessment of Spacecraft Reentry Hazards ........................................... 13
ODAR Section 8: Assessment for Tether Missions.................................................................. 17
Appendix A: Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... 18




Self-assessment of the ODAR using the format in Appendix A.2 of NASA-STD-
8719.14:

A self assessment is provided below in accordance with the assessment format
provided in Appendix A.2 of NASA-STD-8719.14.


                                                                              2


                                Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3




Note 1: The primary payloads for this mission belong to other organizations. This is not a primary
mission of Aquila Space. All other portions of the launch composite are not the responsibility of
Aquila Space and the Corvus Program is not the lead launch organization.

Assessment Report Format:

ODAR Technical Sections Format Requirements:

Aquila Space, Inc. is a US company. This ODAR follows the format in NASA-STD-
8719.14, Appendix A.1 and includes the content indicated as a minimum, in each of
sections 2 through 8 below for the Corvus-BC3 satellite. Sections 9 through 14
apply to the launch vehicle ODAR and are not covered here.


Corvus-BC3 Space Mission Program:

ODAR Section 1: Program Management and Mission Overview

Program/project manager: Brian Cooper

Senior Management: Chris Biddy

Foreign government or space agency participation: None.

Summary of NASA’s responsibility under the governing agreement(s): N/A


Schedule of upcoming mission milestones:

    •   Shipment of one (1) spacecraft to Spaceflight Services, Seattle, WA: 30
        January 2016
    •   Launch: 1 April 2016


                                                 3


                           Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3



Mission Overview: Corvus-BC3 is a remote sensing satellite designed to collect
multi-spectral imagery data at 22 meters resolution. It will be launched into a sun-
synchronous, Low Earth Orbit (LEO) inside a 6U Cubesat deployer device developed
by ISIS, Inc. The deployer is to be included on-board a PSLV launch vehicle, planned
for launch on 15 December 2017. The spacecraft carries three separate cameras to
gather imagery in the Red, Green, and Near-Infrared spectral bands with frequent
revisit times. This imagery is processed on-board and then downlinked over a
miniaturized high-speed Ka-band transmitter. The satellite bus uses reaction
wheels, magnetic torque coils, a star tracker, magnetometers, sun sensors, and
gyroscopes to enable precision 3-axis pointing without the use of propellant.

Launch Vehicle and Launch Site: PSLV, Satish Dhawan Space Centre, India

Proposed Launch Date: 15 December 2017

Mission Duration: The anticipated lifetime of the spacecraft (pl.) is ≥ 1 year in LEO.

Launch and deployment profile, including all parking, transfer, and
operational orbits with apogee, perigee, and inclination: The Falcon 9 launch
vehicle will launch will transport multiple mission payloads to orbit. Corvus-BC3
will be deployed into an approximately sun synchronous elliptical low Earth orbit.
Once the final stage has burned out, the primary payloads will be dispensed. After
the primary payloads are clear, the secondary payload will separate. Corvus-BC3
will deploy a UHF antenna and two solar panels once deployed from a QuadPack
deployer from ISIS. The spacecraft will decay naturally from an operational circular
orbit defined as follows:

Apogee: 505 ± 20 km

Perigee: 505 ± 20 km

Inclination: 97.4° ± 1°

Corvus-BC3 has no on-board propulsion and therefore does not actively change its
orbit. There is no parking or transfer orbit.

ODAR Section 2: Spacecraft Description:

Physical description of the spacecraft: Corvus-BC3 is based on the 6U Cubesat form
factor. Basic physical dimensions are 366 mm x 239 mm x 113 mm with a mass of
approximately 11.5 kg. The superstructure is comprised of six rectangular plates
forming the sides of the structure with interior stiffening members. There are L
rails along each of the 366 mm corner edges. These accommodate the deployment
of the satellite from the deployer. Additional stiffness is provided by various major
module components mounted within the spacecraft structure. These include the


                                          4


                           Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3

Imaging Payload, the Ka-Band transmitter, the Attitude Control Module, and the
Data and Power Module. The design includes a spring-loaded UHF and two solar
panels that are deployed after jettison from the deployer by two independent burn
wires controlled by software timers via the flight computer. Power is locked away
from all spacecraft platform and payload components by means of redundant series
separation switches. These switches cannot be activated until the spacecraft
separates from the deployer structure. The spacecraft is depicted in Figure 1.




                          Figure 1: Corvus-BC3 Spacecraft

Total satellite mass at launch, including all propellants and fluids: 11.5 kg.

Dry mass of satellites at launch: 11.5 kg. (No propellants exist)

Description of all propulsion systems (cold gas, mono-propellant, bi-
propellant, electric, nuclear): None.

Identification, including mass and pressure, of all fluids (liquids and gases)
planned to be on board and a description of the fluid loading plan or
strategies, excluding fluids in sealed heat pipes: None

Fluids in Pressurized Batteries: None

The Corvus-BC3 satellite uses four unpressurized standard COTS Lithium-Ion
battery cells in each spacecraft. The energy capacity of each battery is 12 W-Hrs.
The total capacity energy capacity per spacecraft is 48 W-Hrs.




                                          5


                            Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3

Description of attitude control system and indication of the normal attitude of
the spacecraft with respect to the velocity vector: The Corvus-BC3 spacecraft
attitude will be controlled initially by 5 magnetorquer coils embedded in the solar
arrays, which will allow the satellite to be aligned relative to the Earth’s magnetic
field. These will allow the satellite detumble and align with the magnetic field.

    •   An inertial mode that is optimized for solar power generation from the
        satellite. The spacecraft’s large fixed panel and deployable panel will be
        oriented towards the sun. This mode will make use of magnetometers, sun
        sensors, reaction wheels, and magnetic torquers to orient the spacecraft
        correctly.
    •   A targeted tracking mode, which will allow the Imager or Ka-Band antenna to
        be directed at any location on the Earth’s surface. This mode is used for
        taking multi-spectral imagery and for downlinking payload data to a Ka-
        band ground station. This mode will make use of reaction wheels and a star
        tracker to orient the spacecraft.

Description of any range safety or other pyrotechnic devices: None. The
spacecraft deploys its antenna and panels using a burn wire system. System power
is locked off during launch by two series and two parallel deployment switches but,
the QUADPACK prevents any form of premature deployment, in any case. The
antenna and panel spring constants are very low.

Description of the electrical generation and storage system: Standard COTS
Lithium-Ion battery cells are charged before payload integration and provide
electrical energy during the eclipse portion of the satellites’ orbit. A series of Triple
Junction Solar Cells generate a maximum on-orbit power of approximately 34 watts
at the end-of-life of the mission (5 years for calculation purposes). Typical
operational mode for the satellite consumes 17 watts of power on average. The
charge/discharge cycle is managed by a power management system overseen by the
Flight Computer.

Identification of any other sources of stored energy not noted above: None

Identification of any radioactive materials on board: None


ODAR Section 3: Assessment of Spacecraft Debris Released during Normal
Operations:

Identification of any object (>1 mm) expected to be released from the
spacecraft any time after launch, including object dimensions, mass, and
material: None.

Rationale/necessity for release of each object: N/A.



                                           6


                           Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3



Time of release of each object, relative to launch time: N/A.

Release velocity of each object with respect to spacecraft: N/A.
Expected orbital parameters (apogee, perigee, and inclination) of each object
after release: N/A.

Calculated orbital lifetime of each object, including time spent in Low Earth
Orbit (LEO): N/A.

Assessment of spacecraft compliance with Requirements 4.3-1 and 4.3-2 (per
DAS v2.0.2)
4.3-1, Mission Related Debris Passing Through LEO: COMPLIANT
4.3-2, Mission Related Debris Passing Near GEO: COMPLIANT


ODAR Section 4: Assessment of Spacecraft Intentional Breakups and Potential
for Explosions.

Potential causes of spacecraft breakup during deployment and mission operations:
There is no credible scenario that would result in spacecraft breakup during normal
deployment and operations.

Summary of failure modes and effects analyses of all credible failure modes
which may lead to an accidental explosion: The in-orbit failure of a battery cell
protection circuit could lead to a short circuit resulting in overheating and a very
remote possibility of battery cell explosion. The battery safety systems discussed in
the FMEA (see requirement 4.4-1 below) describe the combined faults that must
occur for any of seven (7) independent, mutually exclusive failure modes to lead to
such an explosion.

Detailed plan for any designed spacecraft breakup, including explosions and
intentional collisions: There are no planned breakups.

List of components which shall be passivated at End of Mission (EOM)
including method of passivation and amount which cannot be passivated:
Four (4) Lithium Ion Battery Cells

Rationale for all items which are required to be passivated, but cannot be due
to their design: None

Assessment of spacecraft compliance with Requirements 4.4-1 through 4.4-4:

Requirement 4.4-1: Limiting the risk to other space systems from accidental
explosions during deployment and mission operations while in orbit about
Earth or the Moon: “For each spacecraft and launch vehicle orbital stage employed


                                          7


                            Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3

for a mission, the program or project shall demonstrate, via failure mode and effects
analyses or equivalent analyses, that the integrated probability of explosion for all
credible failure modes of each spacecraft and launch vehicle is less than 0.001
(excluding small particle impacts) (Requirement 56449).”


Compliance statement:

Required Probability: 0.001.

Expected probability: 0.000.

Supporting Rationale and FMEA details:

Battery explosion:

Effect: All failure modes below might result in battery explosion with the possibility
of orbital debris generation. However, in the unlikely event that a battery cell does
explosively rupture, the small size, mass, and potential energy, of these small
batteries is such that while the spacecraft could be expected to vent gases, most
debris from the battery rupture should be contained within the spacecraft due to
the lack of penetration energy to the multiple enclosures surrounding the batteries.

Probability: Extremely Low. It is believed to be less than 0.01% given that multiple
independent (not common mode) faults must occur for each failure mode to cause
the ultimate effect (explosion).

Failure mode 1: Internal short circuit.

Mitigation 1: Protoflight level sine burst, sine and random vibration in three axes of
both spacecraft, thermal vacuum cycling of both spacecraft and extensive functional
testing followed by maximum system rate-limited charge and discharge cycles were
performed to prove that no internal short circuit sensitivity exists. Additional
environmental and functional testing of the batteries at the power subsystem
vendor facilities were also conducted on the batteries at the component level.

Combined faults required for realized failure: Environmental testing AND functional
charge/discharge tests must both be ineffective in discovery of the failure mode.

Failure Mode 2: Internal thermal rise due to high load discharge rate.

Mitigation 2: Battery cells were tested in lab for high load discharge rates in a
variety of flight-like configurations to determine if the feasibility of an out-of-control
thermal rise in the cell. Cells were also tested in a hot, thermal vacuum environment
(5 cycles at 50° C, then to -20°C) in order to test the upper limit of the cells



                                            8


                            Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3

capability. No failures were observed or identified via satellite telemetry or via
external monitoring circuitry.

Combined faults required for realized failure: Spacecraft thermal design must be
incorrect AND external over-current detection and disconnect function must fail to
enable this failure mode.

Failure Mode 3: Excessive discharge rate or short-circuit due to external device
failure or terminal contact with conductors not at battery voltage levels (due to
abrasion or inadequate proximity separation).

Mitigation 3: This failure mode is negated by:

a) qualification tested short circuit protection on each external circuit,

b) design of battery packs and insulators such that no contact with nearby board
traces is possible without being caused by some other mechanical failure,

c) observation of such other mechanical failures by protoflight level environmental
tests (sine burst, random vibration, thermal cycling, and thermal-vacuum tests).

Combined faults required for realized failure: An external load must fail/short-circuit
AND external over-current detection and disconnect function must all occur to
enable this failure mode.



Failure Mode 4: Inoperable vents.

Mitigation 4: Battery venting is not inhibited by the battery holder design or the
spacecraft design. The battery can vent gases to the external environment.

Combined effects required for realized failure: The cell manufacturer OR the satellite
integrator fails to install proper venting.

Failure Mode 5: Crushing

Mitigation 5: This mode is negated by spacecraft design. There are no moving parts
in the proximity of the batteries.

Combined faults required for realized failure: A catastrophic failure must occur in an
external system AND the failure must cause a collision sufficient to crush the
batteries leading to an internal short circuit AND the satellite must be in a naturally
sustained orbit at the time the crushing occurs.




                                           9


                             Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3

Failure Mode 6: Low level current leakage or short-circuit through battery pack
case or due to moisture-based degradation of insulators.

Mitigation 6: These modes are negated by:

   a) battery holder/case design made of non-conductive plastic, and

   b) operation in vacuum such that no moisture can affect insulators.


Combined faults required for realized failure: Abrasion or piercing failure of circuit
board coating or wire insulators AND dislocation of battery packs AND failure of
battery terminal insulators AND failure to detect such failures in environmental
tests must occur to result in this failure mode.

Failure Mode 7: Excess temperatures due to orbital environment and high
discharge combined.

Mitigation 7: The spacecraft thermal design will negate this possibility. Thermal rise
has been analyzed in combination with space environment temperatures showing
that batteries do not exceed normal allowable operating temperatures under a
variety of modeled cases, including worst case orbital scenarios. Analysis shows
these temperatures to be well below temperatures of concern for explosions.

Combined faults required for realized failure: Thermal analysis AND thermal design
AND mission simulations in thermal-vacuum chamber testing AND over-current
monitoring and control must all fail for this failure mode to occur.

Requirement 4.4-2: Design for passivation after completion of mission
operations while in orbit about Earth or the Moon:

‘Design of all spacecraft and launch vehicle orbital stages shall include the ability to
deplete all onboard sources of stored energy and disconnect all energy generation
sources when they are no longer required for mission operations or post-mission
disposal or control to a level which can not cause an explosion or deflagration large
enough to release orbital debris or break up the spacecraft (Requirement 56450).”

Compliance statement: Corvus-BC includes the ability to fully disconnect the
Lithium Ion cells from the charging current of the solar arrays. At End-Of-Life, this
feature can be used to completely passivate the batteries by removing all energy
from them. In the unlikely event that a battery cell does explosively rupture, the
small size, mass, and potential energy, of these small batteries is such that while the
spacecraft could be expected to vent gases, most debris from the battery rupture
should be contained within the spacecraft due to the lack of penetration energy to
the multiple enclosures surrounding the batteries.



                                            10


                            Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3

Requirement 4.4-3. Limiting the long-term risk to other space systems from
planned breakups: Compliance statement: This requirement is not applicable.
There are no planned breakups.

Requirement 4.4-4: Limiting the short-term risk to other space systems from
planned breakups: Compliance statement: This requirement is not applicable.
There are no planned breakups.


ODAR Section 5: Assessment of Spacecraft Potential for On-Orbit Collisions


Assessment of spacecraft compliance with Requirements 4.5-1 and 4.5-2 (per
DAS v2.0.2, and calculation methods provided in NASA-STD-8719.14, section
4.5.4):

Requirement 4.5-1. Limiting debris generated by collisions with large objects
when operating in Earth orbit:

“For each spacecraft and launch vehicle orbital stage in or passing through LEO, the
program or project shall demonstrate that, during the orbital lifetime of each
spacecraft and orbital stage, the probability of accidental collision with space objects
larger than 10 cm in diameter is less than 0.001 (Requirement 56506).”

Large Object Impact and Debris Generation Probability: 0.00000; COMPLIANT.

Requirement 4.5-2. Limiting debris generated by collisions with small objects
when operating in Earth or lunar orbit:

“For each spacecraft, the program or project shall demonstrate that, during the
mission of the spacecraft, the probability of accidental collision with orbital debris and
meteoroids sufficient to prevent compliance with the applicable postmission disposal
requirements is less than 0.01 (Requirement 56507).”

Small Object Impact and Debris Generation Probability: 0.00000; COMPLIANT

Identification of all systems or components required to accomplish any post-
mission disposal operation, including passivation and maneuvering: None


ODAR Section 6: Assessment of Spacecraft Post-mission Disposal Plans and
Procedures


6.1 Description of spacecraft disposal option selected: The satellite will de-orbit
naturally by atmospheric re-entry. There is no propulsion system.


                                           11


                            Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3



6.2 Plan for any spacecraft maneuvers required to accomplish post-mission
disposal: None

6.3 Calculation of area-to-mass ratio after post-mission disposal, if the
controlled reentry option is not selected:

Spacecraft Mass: 11.5 kg

Cross-sectional Area: 0.124 m^2

(Calculated by DAS 2.0.2). Area to mass ratio: 0.124/11.5 = 0.0108 m^2/kg

6.4 Assessment of spacecraft compliance with Requirements 4.6-1 through
4.6-5 (per DAS v 2.0.2 and NASA-STD-8719.14 section): Requirement 4.6-1.
Disposal for space structures passing through LEO:

“A spacecraft or orbital stage with a perigee altitude below 2000 km shall be disposed
of by one of three methods: (Requirement 56557)

a. Atmospheric reentry option: Leave the space structure in an orbit in which natural
forces will lead to atmospheric reentry within 25 years after the completion of mission
but no more than 30 years after launch; or Maneuver the space structure into a
controlled de-orbit trajectory as soon as practical after completion of mission.

b. Storage orbit option: Maneuver the space structure into an orbit with perigee
altitude greater than 2000 km and apogee less than GEO - 500 km.

c. Direct retrieval: Retrieve the space structure and remove it from orbit within 10
years after completion of mission.”

Analysis: The Corvus-BC3 satellite method of disposal is COMPLIANT using method
“a.” The spacecraft will be left in a 505 km near-circular orbit, reentering in
approximately 5.0 years after launch with orbit history as shown in Figure 2
(analysis assumes an approximate random tumbling behavior).




                                           12


                           Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3




                          Figure 2: Corvus-BC3 Orbit History


Requirement 4.6-2. Disposal for space structures near GEO:
Analysis is not applicable.

Requirement 4.6-3. Disposal for space structures between LEO and GEO:
Analysis is not applicable.

Requirement 4.6-4. Reliability of Post-mission Disposal Operations:
Analysis is not applicable. The satellite will reenter passively without post mission
disposal operations within the allowable timeframe.


ODAR Section 7: Assessment of Spacecraft Reentry Hazards:

Assessment of spacecraft compliance with Requirement 4.7-1: Requirement
4.7-1. Limit the risk of human casualty:


                                          13


                           Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3



“The potential for human casualty is assumed for any object with an impacting kinetic
energy in excess of 15 joules:
a) For uncontrolled reentry, the risk of human casualty from surviving debris shall not
exceed 0.0001 (1:10,000) (Requirement 56626).”
Summary Analysis Results: DAS v2.0.2 reports that Corvus-BC1 and Corvus-BC2 are
COMPLIANT with the requirement. The critical values reported by the DAS software
are:

   •   Demise Altitude = 77.9 km
   •   Debris Casualty Area = 0.000000
   •   Impact Kinetic Energy = 0.000000

This is expected to represent the absolute maximum casualty risk, as calculated
with DAS's limited modeling capability. The DAS Output Summary Follows:

=============== End of Requirement 4.3-1 ===============
09 19 2017; 18:58:14PM Processing Requirement 4.3-2: Return Status : Passed

=====================
No Project Data Available
=====================

=============== End of Requirement 4.3-2 ===============
09 19 2017; 18:58:19PM Requirement 4.4-3: Compliant

=============== End of Requirement 4.4-3 ===============
09 19 2017; 19:12:20PM Processing Requirement 4.5-1:  Return Status :
Passed

==============
Run Data
==============

**INPUT**

       Space Structure Name = CorvusBC3
       Space Structure Type = Payload
       Perigee Altitude = 505.000000 (km)
       Apogee Altitude = 505.000000 (km)
       Inclination = 96.400000 (deg)
       RAAN = 0.000000 (deg)
       Argument of Perigee = 0.000000 (deg)
       Mean Anomaly = 0.000000 (deg)
       Final Area-To-Mass Ratio = 0.010800 (m^2/kg)



                                          14


                        Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3

      Start Year = 2018.000000 (yr)
      Initial Mass = 11.500000 (kg)
      Final Mass = 11.500000 (kg)
      Duration = 5.000000 (yr)
      Station-Kept = False
      Abandoned = True
      PMD Perigee Altitude = -1.000000 (km)
      PMD Apogee Altitude = -1.000000 (km)
      PMD Inclination = 0.000000 (deg)
      PMD RAAN = 0.000000 (deg)
      PMD Argument of Perigee = 0.000000 (deg)
      PMD Mean Anomaly = 0.000000 (deg)

**OUTPUT**

      Collision Probability = 0.000001
      Returned Error Message: Normal Processing
      Date Range Error Message: Normal Date Range
      Status = Pass

==============

=============== End of Requirement 4.5-1 ===============
09 19 2017; 19:13:04PM Requirement 4.5-2: Compliant
09 19 2017; 19:13:07PM Processing Requirement 4.6Return Status : Passed

==============
Project Data
==============

**INPUT**

      Space Structure Name = CorvusBC3
      Space Structure Type = Payload

      Perigee Altitude = 505.000000 (km)
      Apogee Altitude = 505.000000 (km)
      Inclination = 96.400000 (deg)
      RAAN = 0.000000 (deg)
      Argument of Perigee = 0.000000 (deg)
      Mean Anomaly = 0.000000 (deg)
      Area-To-Mass Ratio = 0.010800 (m^2/kg)
      Start Year = 2018.000000 (yr)
      Initial Mass = 11.500000 (kg)
      Final Mass = 11.500000 (kg)
      Duration = 5.000000 (yr)


                                     15


                          Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3

      Station Kept = False
      Abandoned = True
      PMD Perigee Altitude = -1.000000 (km)
      PMD Apogee Altitude = -1.000000 (km)
      PMD Inclination = 0.000000 (deg)
      PMD RAAN = 0.000000 (deg)
      PMD Argument of Perigee = 0.000000 (deg)
      PMD Mean Anomaly = 0.000000 (deg)

**OUTPUT**

      Suggested Perigee Altitude = 505.000000 (km)
      Suggested Apogee Altitude = 505.000000 (km)
      Returned Error Message = Reentry during mission (no PMD req.).

      Released Year = 2022 (yr)
      Requirement = 61
      Compliance Status = Pass

==============

=============== End of Requirement 4.6 ===============
09 20 2017; 18:27:36PM *********Processing Requirement 4.7-1
       Return Status : Passed

***********INPUT****
 Item Number = 1

name = CorvusBC3
quantity = 1
parent = 0
materialID = 5
type = Box
Aero Mass = 11.500000
Thermal Mass = 11.500000
Diameter/Width = 0.200000
Length = 0.350000
Height = 0.100000

name = Lenses
quantity = 3
parent = 1
materialID = -1
type = Cylinder
Aero Mass = 0.085000
Thermal Mass = 0.085000


                                       16


                            Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3

Diameter/Width = 0.070000
Length = 0.040000

**************OUTPUT****
Item Number = 1

name = CorvusBC3
Demise Altitude = 77.998566
Debris Casualty Area = 0.000000
Impact Kinetic Energy = 0.000000

*************************************
name = Lenses
Demise Altitude = 75.758469
Debris Casualty Area = 0.000000
Impact Kinetic Energy = 0.000000

*************************************

=============== End of Requirement 4.7-1 ===============

*************************************


Requirements 4.7-1b, and 4.7-1c:
These requirements are non-applicable requirements because Corvus-BC3 does not
use controlled reentry.

4.7-1, b): “For controlled reentry, the selected trajectory shall ensure that no
surviving debris impact with a kinetic energy greater than 15 joules is closer than 370
km from foreign landmasses, or is within 50 km from the continental U.S., territories of
the U.S., and the permanent ice pack of Antarctica (Requirement 56627).”

Not applicable to Corvus-BC3. The spacecraft does not use controlled reentry and
no debris is expected to survive.

4.7-1 c): “For controlled reentries, the product of the probability of failure of the
reentry burn (from Requirement 4.6-4.b) and the risk of human casualty assuming
uncontrolled reentry shall not exceed 0.0001 (1:10,000) (Requirement 56628).”
Not applicable to Corvus-BC3. It does not use controlled reentry and no debris is
expected to survive.


ODAR Section 8: Assessment for Tether Missions
Not applicable. There are no tethers used in the Corvus-BC3 mission.



                                           17


                                  Corvus-BC3 ODAR – Version 1.3

END of ODAR for Corvus-BC3

--------------------------------------------------------------

Appendix A: Acronyms

Arg peri          Argument of Perigee
CDR               Critical Design Review
Cm                centimeter
COTS              Commercial Off-The-Shelf (items)
DAS               Debris Assessment Software
EOM               End Of Mission
FRR               Flight Readiness Review
GEO               Geosynchronous Earth Orbit
ITAR              International Traffic In Arms Regulations
Kg                kilogram
Km                kilometer
LEO               Low Earth Orbit
Li-Ion            Lithium Ion
m^2               Meters squared
ml                milliliter
mm                millimeter
N/A               Not Applicable.
NET               Not Earlier Than
ODAR              Orbital Debris Assessment Report
OSMA              Office of Safety and Mission Assurance
PDR               Preliminary Design Review
PL                Payload
ISIPOD            ISIS CubeSat Deployer
PSIa              Pounds Per Square Inch, absolute
RAAN              Right Ascension of the Ascending Node
SMA               Safety and Mission Assurance
Ti                Titanium
Yr                year




                                                    18



Document Created: 1540-04-27 00:00:00
Document Modified: 1540-04-27 00:00:00

© 2026 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC