Advanced Protection Systems LLC

0996-EX-ST-2018

Status: Pending


2018-06-01

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
E-Mail generated [Jun 1 2018]Correspondence2018-06-01
E-Mail generated [Jun 1 2018]Correspondence2018-06-01
Incoming generated [Jun 1 2018]Correspondence2018-06-01
Incoming generated [Jun 1 2018]Correspondence2018-06-01
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Sep 21 2018]Correspondence2018-09-21
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  Advanced Protection Systems LLC

Address
Attention: Wayne Horvath
Street Address: 301 Route 17, Suite 800
P.O. Box:
City: Rutherford
State: NJ
Zip Code: 07070
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Horvath
First Name: Wayne
Title: BD Manager
Phone Number: 7045750779

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
The STA will enable Advanced Protection Systems to test its low weight, low power prototype radar with a prospective customers at their test facility in order to refine its design and evaluate performance before requesting permanent licensing. This is necessary to support work we are doing on counter-drone technology, as well as work on sense-and-avoid technology.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  To test the low weight, low power radar sensor prototype. This radar device was designed to detect micro- and small-drones, with possible applications in counter-drone systems and sense-and-avoid drone systems. Counter-drone systems are urgently needed in defence and consumer industries. Sense-and-avoid systems with radar sensors enable drones to detect and avoid other airborne vehicles, allowing them to safely fly. We will need to perform testing and demonstrations at several locations.

Information
Callsign: WN9XJU
Class of Station: MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 07/01/2018
Operation End Date: 12/30/2018

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Advanced Protection Systems KA3D 2 No
Advanced Protection Systems RA3D 1 No

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Maciej Klemm
Title of Applicant (if any): Dr
Date: 2018-06-01 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Quantico Virginia North  38  34  28 West  77  32  43 Quantico, VA 8.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 10.30000000-10.60000000 GHz MO 2.000000 W 49.000000 W P 0.00001000 % 100MF0N FMCW

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Columbus North Carolina North  35  15  11 West  82  11  49 Columbus, NC 16.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 10.30000000-10.60000000 GHz MO 2.000000 W 49.000000 W P 0.00001000 % 100MF0N FMCW

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Live Oak Florida North  30  14  17 West  82  52  8 Live Oak, FL 5.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 10.30000000-10.60000000 GHz MO 2.000000 W 49.000000 W P 0.00001000 % 100MF0N FMCW

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Stateline Nevada North  38  57  43 West  119  56  39 Stateline, NV 89449 5.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 10.30000000-10.60000000 GHz MO 2.000000 W 49.000000 W P 0.00001000 % 100MF0N FMCW

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
North  40  1  47 West  74  37  6 Fort Dix, NJ 8.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 10.40000000-10.60000000 GHz MO 5.000000 W 96.000000 W P 0.00001000 % 100MF0N FMCW

35081

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC