Correspondence

0176-EX-PL-2005 Text Documents

AT&T; CORP.

2005-09-15ELS_72704

Message                                                               flns     ‘_'/'g//;’
                                                                            Mia            607 ///Zf/ 246   _z   Page| of 3
                                                                                 /
                                                                                                            «_

                                                                       C , 7 C _e 223

  Anthony Serafini

   From:        hworstell@research.att.com
   Sent:        Friday, September 09, 2005 3:56 PM
   To:          Anthony Serafini
   Subject: RE: Experimental License WD2XSL Coordination

Mr. Serafini.

Thank you for your assistance.

The proposal is very acceptable and will permit us to move forward
with our research and testing. | would like the license to indicate a
maximum power of 3 watts EIRP. We will operate our equipment as far
below that power level as practical for our experiments.

Thank you again for your help.

Best regards,
Harry Worstell



Harry R. Worstell
Sr. Technical Specialist
Communications Technology Research
AT&T Labs — Shannon Laboratory
Vice Chair, IEEE 802.11 Working Group
Room B233. Building 103
180 Park Avenue
P.O. Box 971
Florham Park, NJ 07932—0971
Phone: +1 (973) 236—6915
Cell +1(973) 727—5564
Fax: +1 (973) 360—5873
EMAIL: hworstell@research att.com




From: Anthony Serafini [mailto:Anthony.Serafini@fcc.gov]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 3:40 PM
To: Worstel!,Harry R (Harry)
Subject: RE: Experimental License WD2XSL Coordination

Mr. Worstell


I have discussed your situation with my supervisor. He agrees that we may modify your license to permit you to
move forward with your testing. To limit the interference potential to licensed users we will need to reduce your
operating power. You suggest that you only need 1—3 watts and can operate within a 1 km radius. Is this still
acceptable? What power level do you need?

We can remove the coordination requirement, however, your testing will still be on a non—interference basis. In
the event of any interference, you would be required to shut down until the issues are resolved.

Please confirm that this is acceptable and I can then go ahead and make the adjustments to the license.




09/12/2005


Message                                                                                              Page 2 of 3



Tony Serafini

      —————Original Message—————
      From: hworstell@research.att.com [mailto:hworstell@research.att.com]
      Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:01 AM
      To: Anthony Serafini
      Subject: Experimental License WD2XSL Coordination

      Dear Mr. Serafini,

      I was a pleasure speaking with you yesterday.

      As | indicated, we are having some problems gaining permission from the cellular carriers to use our
      experimental license. We originally attained the services of Ericsson to perform frequency coordination and
      clearance and they are working through Comsearch.

      The following is the text that we sent, by way of the coordination company, to the service providers. We
      originally attained the services of Ericsson to perform frequency coordination and clearance and they are
      working through Comsearch. We believe that we will only need between 1 to 3 watts of transmit power to
      achieve the goal of our research.

      This is a request for the coordination and use of two (2) GSM mobile Tx (BS Rx) channels in the
      1800—1910MHz and two (2) complementary GSM mobile Rx (BS Tx) channels in the 1930—1990MHz
      bands per our experimental license (call sign WD2XSL, File Number 0176—EX—PL—2005). We would
      like to have the channels active for a year. We understand that the channels which we use may
      change during that time and can change assignments as long as some reasonable advance
      coordination is communicated. We have attained the services of Ericsson to perform frequency
      coordination and clearance.

      These channels will be used for an experimental wireless research program. The channels will be
      only used at one fixed location, with only one sector antenna at a height of approximately 18 feet
      above the ground. The cell site and antenna will be located in Florham Park, Morris County, New
      Jersey at NL 40—46—37 and WL 74—24—43.


       fl Picture (Metafile)



      The antenna will be pointed directly at a building 230 degrees (South—West) from the antenna
      location. The antenna is ~ 530 feet away from the building and will only use sufficient transmit
      power to penetrate the perimeter of the building. The antenna is an Ericsson 1301—KRE 101 195971
      Uen and has a gain of 18dBi. The horizontal beam width of the antenna is 88 degrees, has a vertical
      beam width of 4.7 degrees and will be down tilted. The mobile coverage distance will be less than 1
      km.



      As requested, | am attaching the rejection letter from Comsearch.
      <<ATT Frequency Coordination 08—30—05.doc>>
      Any help you can provide us is appreciated.


      Best regards,
      Harry Worstel!




09/12/2005


Message                                      Page 3 of3


     Harry R. Worstell
     Sr. Technical Specialist
     Communications Technology Research
     AT&T Labs — Shannon Laboratory
     Vice Chair. IEEE 802.11 Working Group
     Room B233. Building 103
     180 Park Avenue
     P.O. Box 971
     Florham Park, NJ 07932—0971
     Phone: +1 (973) 236—6915
     Cell +1(973) 727—5564
     Fax: +1 (973) 360—5873
     EMAIL: hworstell@research att.com




09/12/2005



Document Created: 2005-09-15 11:29:14
Document Modified: 2005-09-15 11:29:14

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC