AMG Technology Investment Group, LLC d.b.a Nextlink

1438-EX-ST-2021

Status: Pending

N/A
2021-10-04

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
Description of Experimental ProgramText Documents2021-10-04
Description of Experimental ProgramText Documents2021-10-04
Description of Experimental ProgramText Documents2021-10-04
E-Mail generated [Oct 7 2021]Correspondence2021-10-07
E-Mail generated [Nov 9 2021]Correspondence2021-11-09
E-Mail generated [Nov 10 2021]Correspondence2021-11-10
Incoming generated [Oct 7 2021]Correspondence2021-10-07
Incoming generated [Oct 7 2021]Correspondence2021-10-07
Incoming generated [Nov 11 2021]Correspondence2021-11-11
Amendment in Response to InquiryText Documents2021-11-11
Amendment in Response to InquiryText Documents2021-11-11
Amended Description of Experimental ProgramText Documents2021-11-09
E-Mail generated [Nov 29 2021]Correspondence2021-11-29
Incoming generated [Dec 1 2021]Correspondence2021-12-01
E-Mail generated [Jan 6 2022]Correspondence2022-01-06
E-Mail generated [Feb 8 2022]Correspondence2022-02-08
E-Mail generated [Feb 15 2022]Correspondence2022-02-15
Incoming generated [Feb 11 2022]Correspondence2022-02-11
Incoming generated [Feb 18 2022]Correspondence2022-02-18
Incoming generated [Feb 18 2022]Correspondence2022-02-18
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Feb 25 2022]Correspondence2022-02-25
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  AMG Technology Investment Group, LLC d.b.a Nextlink

Address
Attention: Chief Technology Officer
Street Address: 95 Parker Oaks Lane
P.O. Box:
City: Hudson Oaks
State: TX
Zip Code: 7608775075
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Kilton
First Name: Cameron
Title: Chief Technology Officer
Phone Number: 682-207-4928

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
Nextlink seeks to conduct short-term testing of Cambium equipment in order to evaluate its task-specific effectiveness which will inform our system design and purchasing decisions.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  Nextlink will conduct vendor testing for point to multipoint configuration in Hudson Oaks and Weatherford, Texas. We’ll be operating the equipment for capacity testing across multiple “remote” connections back to several vertical assets concurrently at various power limits not to exceed 36dBm EIRP.

Information
Callsign: WS9XYR
Class of Station: FX MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 03/01/2022
Operation End Date: 09/01/2022

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Cambium Networks ePMP 6000 2 Yes
Cambium Networks ePMP Force 600 20 Yes

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Cameron Kilton
Title of Applicant (if any): CTO
Date: 2021-09-05 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Hudson Oaks Texas North  32  45  3 West  97  41  17
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   65.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:   360.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:   5.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:   9.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:   311.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:   52.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: The antenna will be mounted on an existing tower with no increase in overall height. Additionally the test area is heavily-wooded with rolling hills.
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 5925.00000000-6400.00000000 MHz FX 60.000000 mW 2.430000 W P 0.00160000 % 16M0D7D OFDM-TDD

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Weatherford Texas North  32  47  2 West  97  43  13
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   65.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:   180.00
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:   5.00
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:   35.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:   387.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:   5.13
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: The antenna will be mounted on an existing tower with no increase in overall height. Additionally the test area is heavily-wooded with rolling hills.
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 5925.00000000-6425.00000000 MHz FX 60.000000 mW 2.430000 W P 0.00160000 % 16M0D7D OFDM-TDD

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Hudson Oaks Texas North  32  45  3 West  97  41  17 10.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 6525.00000000-6875.00000000 MHz MO 12.600000 mW 2.430000 W P 0.00160000 % 16M0D7D OFDM-TDD

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Weatherford Texas North  31  47  2 West  97  43  13 10.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
Modified 6525.00000000-6875.00000000 MHz MO 12.600000 mW 2.430000 W P 0.00160000 % 16M0D7D OFDM-TDD

29693

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC